Factors Influencing Team-Based Vaccination Collaboration in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Teams in Beijing, China.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yifan Hou, Ping Zhao, Yuzhe Shi, Meng Ren, Jing Hai, Yang Zhao, Na Zhang, Zhou Wang, Yi Qian, Xu Yang
{"title":"Factors Influencing Team-Based Vaccination Collaboration in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Teams in Beijing, China.","authors":"Yifan Hou, Ping Zhao, Yuzhe Shi, Meng Ren, Jing Hai, Yang Zhao, Na Zhang, Zhou Wang, Yi Qian, Xu Yang","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S596737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the impact of healthcare team collaboration on vaccination status among patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in primary care settings in Beijing, China.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted among members of family doctor teams in Beijing from October to December 2025. A structured questionnaire assessed team collaboration behaviors, influencing factors, guideline awareness, and vaccination practices. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 209 valid responses were included (response rate: 92.07%). Although 57.9% of participants supported shared responsibility for vaccination, only 24.9% reported frequent team discussions, and 9.1% reported none in the past three months. Unstable vaccine supply (M=2.83) and limited performance incentives (M=3.76) were key barriers. While 66.5% of respondents were familiar with relevant guidelines, only 44.5% consistently provided strong vaccination recommendations in clinical scenarios. Patient hesitancy was primarily attributed to concerns about side effects (69.4%). Most respondents (67.0%) estimated vaccination coverage among COPD patients to be below 30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial gap exists between guideline awareness and implementation of vaccination in primary care COPD management. Limited team communication, inadequate system support, and patient hesitancy jointly constrain vaccination uptake. Strengthening structured team collaboration, improving incentive mechanisms, and enhancing scenario-based guideline training may help improve vaccination coverage in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"596737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S596737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the impact of healthcare team collaboration on vaccination status among patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in primary care settings in Beijing, China.

Patients and methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted among members of family doctor teams in Beijing from October to December 2025. A structured questionnaire assessed team collaboration behaviors, influencing factors, guideline awareness, and vaccination practices. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were performed.

Results: A total of 209 valid responses were included (response rate: 92.07%). Although 57.9% of participants supported shared responsibility for vaccination, only 24.9% reported frequent team discussions, and 9.1% reported none in the past three months. Unstable vaccine supply (M=2.83) and limited performance incentives (M=3.76) were key barriers. While 66.5% of respondents were familiar with relevant guidelines, only 44.5% consistently provided strong vaccination recommendations in clinical scenarios. Patient hesitancy was primarily attributed to concerns about side effects (69.4%). Most respondents (67.0%) estimated vaccination coverage among COPD patients to be below 30%.

Conclusion: A substantial gap exists between guideline awareness and implementation of vaccination in primary care COPD management. Limited team communication, inadequate system support, and patient hesitancy jointly constrain vaccination uptake. Strengthening structured team collaboration, improving incentive mechanisms, and enhancing scenario-based guideline training may help improve vaccination coverage in this population.

影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病团队疫苗接种合作的因素:中国北京初级保健团队的多中心横断面调查
目的:本研究旨在探讨北京基层卫生保健机构医疗团队协作对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者疫苗接种状况的影响因素。患者与方法:于2025年10 - 12月对北京市家庭医生团队成员进行多中心横断面调查。一份结构化问卷评估了团队协作行为、影响因素、指南意识和疫苗接种实践。进行描述性统计和卡方检验。结果:共纳入有效问卷209份,有效率为92.07%。尽管57.9%的参与者支持共同承担疫苗接种责任,但只有24.9%的参与者报告经常进行小组讨论,9.1%的参与者报告在过去三个月内没有进行小组讨论。疫苗供应不稳定(M=2.83)和有限的绩效激励(M=3.76)是主要障碍。66.5%的应答者熟悉相关指南,但只有44.5%的应答者始终如一地在临床场景中提供强有力的疫苗接种建议。患者犹豫的主要原因是担心副作用(69.4%)。大多数答复者(67.0%)估计COPD患者的疫苗接种覆盖率低于30%。结论:在初级保健COPD管理中,指南意识和疫苗接种实施之间存在很大差距。有限的团队沟通,不充分的系统支持和患者的犹豫共同限制了疫苗接种。加强有组织的团队合作,改善激励机制,加强基于场景的指南培训,可能有助于提高这一人群的疫苗接种覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书