Shelf help: what powers medical student subject exam performance in the United States.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2026.2708427
Corine Astroth, Tyler Lunow-Luke, Maren Smith, Josephine Chang, Areg Grigorian, Michael P O'Leary
{"title":"Shelf help: what powers medical student subject exam performance in the United States.","authors":"Corine Astroth, Tyler Lunow-Luke, Maren Smith, Josephine Chang, Areg Grigorian, Michael P O'Leary","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2026.2708427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the change in 2022 of a scored United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a binary pass-fail grading system, greater emphasis has been placed on the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (Step 2 CK) exam. Shelf or subject exams offered by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) help prepare students for Step 2CK and therefore deserve the attention of clerkship directors. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the factors that positively and negatively impact medical students' performance on the shelf exams, including but not limited to performance in the pre-clinical years, clinical exposures, peer learning, active or team-based learning, length of clerkships, and order and number of previous shelf exams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed database was searched to identify studies describing factors influencing performance on shelf exam scores during medical school and strategies for improving shelf scores. Studies were identified through iterative searches using multiple keyword combinations related to NBME shelf examinations, NBME subject examinations, clerkship performance, academic achievement, and educational interventions. Inclusion criteria consisted of English-language studies published between 2005 and 2025 involving students at U.S. allopathic or osteopathic medical schools. The included studies were reviewed for relevance and methodological rigour, including consideration of study design, sample size, statistical analyses, and reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A robust pre-clinical education remains vital for success on NBME shelf examinations. Exam scores are also influenced by the number and order of previous exams. Increased clinical exposure, active learning, team-based approaches, and peer review sessions have not consistently shown improvements in performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the importance of a foundational understanding of the basic sciences for student success on exams, while acknowledging that clerkship directors must balance their obligation to adequately prepare students for standardized testing with their mission to craft compassionate and competent future clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"31 1","pages":"2708427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13431005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2708427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following the change in 2022 of a scored United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a binary pass-fail grading system, greater emphasis has been placed on the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (Step 2 CK) exam. Shelf or subject exams offered by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) help prepare students for Step 2CK and therefore deserve the attention of clerkship directors. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the factors that positively and negatively impact medical students' performance on the shelf exams, including but not limited to performance in the pre-clinical years, clinical exposures, peer learning, active or team-based learning, length of clerkships, and order and number of previous shelf exams.

Methods: The PubMed database was searched to identify studies describing factors influencing performance on shelf exam scores during medical school and strategies for improving shelf scores. Studies were identified through iterative searches using multiple keyword combinations related to NBME shelf examinations, NBME subject examinations, clerkship performance, academic achievement, and educational interventions. Inclusion criteria consisted of English-language studies published between 2005 and 2025 involving students at U.S. allopathic or osteopathic medical schools. The included studies were reviewed for relevance and methodological rigour, including consideration of study design, sample size, statistical analyses, and reported outcomes.

Results: A robust pre-clinical education remains vital for success on NBME shelf examinations. Exam scores are also influenced by the number and order of previous exams. Increased clinical exposure, active learning, team-based approaches, and peer review sessions have not consistently shown improvements in performance.

Conclusions: This review underscores the importance of a foundational understanding of the basic sciences for student success on exams, while acknowledging that clerkship directors must balance their obligation to adequately prepare students for standardized testing with their mission to craft compassionate and competent future clinicians.

货架帮助:是什么力量在美国医学生学科考试成绩。
背景:随着2022年美国医疗执照考试(USMLE)第1步改为通过-不通过二元评分系统,第二步临床知识(step2 CK)考试得到了更大的重视。国家医学检验委员会(NBME)提供的货架或科目考试帮助学生为第二步ck做准备,因此值得助理主任的注意。本文回顾了影响医学生货架考试成绩的积极和消极因素的文献,包括但不限于临床前几年的表现、临床暴露、同伴学习、主动或团队学习、实习时间长短、以前货架考试的顺序和次数。方法:检索PubMed数据库,找出影响医学院学生货架考试成绩的因素和提高货架考试成绩的策略。通过使用与NBME货架考试、NBME学科考试、职员表现、学术成就和教育干预相关的多个关键字组合进行迭代搜索,确定研究。纳入标准包括2005年至2025年间发表的涉及美国对抗疗法或整骨疗法医学院学生的英语研究。对纳入的研究进行相关性和方法严谨性审查,包括考虑研究设计、样本量、统计分析和报告结果。结果:强有力的临床前教育对于NBME货架检查的成功至关重要。考试成绩也会受到之前考试的次数和顺序的影响。增加临床接触、主动学习、以团队为基础的方法和同行评议会议并没有始终显示出绩效的改善。结论:这篇综述强调了对基础科学的基本理解对于学生在考试中取得成功的重要性,同时承认实习主任必须平衡他们的义务,使学生为标准化考试做好充分准备,同时他们的使命是培养富有同情心和能力的未来临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书