Corine Astroth, Tyler Lunow-Luke, Maren Smith, Josephine Chang, Areg Grigorian, Michael P O'Leary
{"title":"Shelf help: what powers medical student subject exam performance in the United States.","authors":"Corine Astroth, Tyler Lunow-Luke, Maren Smith, Josephine Chang, Areg Grigorian, Michael P O'Leary","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2026.2708427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following the change in 2022 of a scored United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a binary pass-fail grading system, greater emphasis has been placed on the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (Step 2 CK) exam. Shelf or subject exams offered by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) help prepare students for Step 2CK and therefore deserve the attention of clerkship directors. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the factors that positively and negatively impact medical students' performance on the shelf exams, including but not limited to performance in the pre-clinical years, clinical exposures, peer learning, active or team-based learning, length of clerkships, and order and number of previous shelf exams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed database was searched to identify studies describing factors influencing performance on shelf exam scores during medical school and strategies for improving shelf scores. Studies were identified through iterative searches using multiple keyword combinations related to NBME shelf examinations, NBME subject examinations, clerkship performance, academic achievement, and educational interventions. Inclusion criteria consisted of English-language studies published between 2005 and 2025 involving students at U.S. allopathic or osteopathic medical schools. The included studies were reviewed for relevance and methodological rigour, including consideration of study design, sample size, statistical analyses, and reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A robust pre-clinical education remains vital for success on NBME shelf examinations. Exam scores are also influenced by the number and order of previous exams. Increased clinical exposure, active learning, team-based approaches, and peer review sessions have not consistently shown improvements in performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review underscores the importance of a foundational understanding of the basic sciences for student success on exams, while acknowledging that clerkship directors must balance their obligation to adequately prepare students for standardized testing with their mission to craft compassionate and competent future clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"31 1","pages":"2708427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13431005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2708427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Following the change in 2022 of a scored United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 to a binary pass-fail grading system, greater emphasis has been placed on the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (Step 2 CK) exam. Shelf or subject exams offered by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) help prepare students for Step 2CK and therefore deserve the attention of clerkship directors. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the factors that positively and negatively impact medical students' performance on the shelf exams, including but not limited to performance in the pre-clinical years, clinical exposures, peer learning, active or team-based learning, length of clerkships, and order and number of previous shelf exams.
Methods: The PubMed database was searched to identify studies describing factors influencing performance on shelf exam scores during medical school and strategies for improving shelf scores. Studies were identified through iterative searches using multiple keyword combinations related to NBME shelf examinations, NBME subject examinations, clerkship performance, academic achievement, and educational interventions. Inclusion criteria consisted of English-language studies published between 2005 and 2025 involving students at U.S. allopathic or osteopathic medical schools. The included studies were reviewed for relevance and methodological rigour, including consideration of study design, sample size, statistical analyses, and reported outcomes.
Results: A robust pre-clinical education remains vital for success on NBME shelf examinations. Exam scores are also influenced by the number and order of previous exams. Increased clinical exposure, active learning, team-based approaches, and peer review sessions have not consistently shown improvements in performance.
Conclusions: This review underscores the importance of a foundational understanding of the basic sciences for student success on exams, while acknowledging that clerkship directors must balance their obligation to adequately prepare students for standardized testing with their mission to craft compassionate and competent future clinicians.
期刊介绍:
Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends.
Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to:
-Basic science education
-Clinical science education
-Residency education
-Learning theory
-Problem-based learning (PBL)
-Curriculum development
-Research design and statistics
-Measurement and evaluation
-Faculty development
-Informatics/web