Laparoscopic Surgery in Recipients of Intra-abdominal Solid Organ Transplants: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.1 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2026-07-17 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00133
Eva Suarthana, Lynn Doan, Neda Mohammadi Danesh, Togas Tulandi
{"title":"Laparoscopic Surgery in Recipients of Intra-abdominal Solid Organ Transplants: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eva Suarthana, Lynn Doan, Neda Mohammadi Danesh, Togas Tulandi","doi":"10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive surgical approach that can reduce morbidity compared with open surgery in appropriately selected patients. However, patients with a history of intra-abdominal solid organ transplantation may have postoperative adhesions and altered anatomy, leading to more complex and variable anatomy. It remains unclear whether prior transplantation increases the risk of complications during laparoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of complications in patients undergoing laparoscopy following intra-abdominal solid organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was conducted through October 2023 to identify studies on laparoscopy in postintra-abdominal solid organ transplant recipients. Two independent reviewers identified 30 relevant articles, of which 19 (including case reports, case-control, and cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale by two independent reviewers. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023477254).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies included direct comparisons between transplant and nontransplant patients. The mean postoperative length of stay was 3.5 days among 1402 transplant patients, compared with 2.3 days among 2,640,340 nontransplant patients. Two studies reported a lower rate of wound infection in nontransplant patients compared with posttransplant patients (1.7% vs. 4.8%). Rates of other infections, seroma formation, ileus, and disease recurrence were comparable between groups, although each was reported by only one small study. Two of the four studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Direct comparisons between patients with and without a history of intra-abdominal solid organ transplantation suggest that laparoscopy is generally safe, with a modest increase in hospital stay and wound infection risk in posttransplant patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"15 3","pages":"261-268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Laparoscopy is a minimally invasive surgical approach that can reduce morbidity compared with open surgery in appropriately selected patients. However, patients with a history of intra-abdominal solid organ transplantation may have postoperative adhesions and altered anatomy, leading to more complex and variable anatomy. It remains unclear whether prior transplantation increases the risk of complications during laparoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of complications in patients undergoing laparoscopy following intra-abdominal solid organ transplantation.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was conducted through October 2023 to identify studies on laparoscopy in postintra-abdominal solid organ transplant recipients. Two independent reviewers identified 30 relevant articles, of which 19 (including case reports, case-control, and cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale by two independent reviewers. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023477254).

Results: Four studies included direct comparisons between transplant and nontransplant patients. The mean postoperative length of stay was 3.5 days among 1402 transplant patients, compared with 2.3 days among 2,640,340 nontransplant patients. Two studies reported a lower rate of wound infection in nontransplant patients compared with posttransplant patients (1.7% vs. 4.8%). Rates of other infections, seroma formation, ileus, and disease recurrence were comparable between groups, although each was reported by only one small study. Two of the four studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias.

Conclusion: Direct comparisons between patients with and without a history of intra-abdominal solid organ transplantation suggest that laparoscopy is generally safe, with a modest increase in hospital stay and wound infection risk in posttransplant patients.

腹腔内实体器官移植受者的腹腔镜手术:系统回顾。
目的:腹腔镜手术是一种微创手术方法,在适当选择的患者中,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术可以降低发病率。然而,有腹腔内实体器官移植史的患者术后可能出现粘连和解剖结构改变,导致解剖结构更加复杂多变。目前尚不清楚术前移植是否会增加腹腔镜手术并发症的风险。本研究旨在评估腹腔内实体器官移植术后腹腔镜手术并发症的发生率。材料与方法:通过系统检索PubMed、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar,到2023年10月确定腹腔内实体器官移植后受者的腹腔镜研究。两名独立审稿人确定了30篇相关文章,其中19篇(包括病例报告、病例对照和队列研究)符合纳入标准。偏倚风险由两位独立审稿人使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023477254)。结果:四项研究包括移植和非移植患者之间的直接比较。1402例移植患者术后平均住院时间为3.5天,而2640340例非移植患者术后平均住院时间为2.3天。两项研究报道,与移植后患者相比,非移植患者的伤口感染率较低(1.7%对4.8%)。其他感染、血肿形成、肠梗阻和疾病复发率在两组之间具有可比性,尽管只有一项小型研究报告了这些发生率。四项研究中有两项被评估为低偏倚风险。结论:有和没有腹腔内实体器官移植史的患者之间的直接比较表明,腹腔镜手术通常是安全的,移植后患者的住院时间和伤口感染风险略有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书