Subcutaneous Pedicle Advancement Flap Anoplasty with Pivot Point Medialization for Anal Stenosis: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23922/jarc.2026-035
Naoki Yago, Masami Saito, Hiroki Yago
{"title":"Subcutaneous Pedicle Advancement Flap Anoplasty with Pivot Point Medialization for Anal Stenosis: A Single-center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Naoki Yago, Masami Saito, Hiroki Yago","doi":"10.23922/jarc.2026-035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Severe anal stenosis, particularly Whitehead deformity, presents a significant reconstructive challenge. This study reports the clinical outcomes of a modified subcutaneous pedicle advancement flap anoplasty emphasizing pivot point medialization, developed in collaboration with plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 52 consecutive patients (aged 32-97 years; median, 67) treated between April 2021 and June 2025. The etiologies included postsurgical cicatricial stenosis (65.4%) and chronic anal fissure (34.6%). The technique involves establishing the pivot point-defined in this study as the biomechanical anchoring point at the deep subcutaneous fat layer-allowing tension-free advancement of the flap medially without rotation while preserving blood flow through the subcutaneous pedicle. Forty-nine patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Bougie examination at 6 months was performed without anesthesia during outpatient visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical success, defined as bougie passage of ≥22 mm (#9), was achieved in 48 of 49 patients (98.0%), with a median operative time of 24 min (range, 14-35 min). No flap necrosis occurred (0%). Complications included wound dehiscence in nine patients (17.3%), which healed conservatively within a median of 4 weeks, and rectal prolapse in one patient (1.9%). One patient (2.0%) showed insufficient dilation at 6 months and required reoperation at 12 months. No fecal incontinence was observed. Patient satisfaction at 3 months was high (very satisfied 63.5%, satisfied 21.2%, unchanged 15.4%, dissatisfied 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This technique, utilizing pivot point medialization and straight advancement without rotation, may offer a safe and effective option for severe anal stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":56349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","volume":"10 3","pages":"487-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2026-035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Severe anal stenosis, particularly Whitehead deformity, presents a significant reconstructive challenge. This study reports the clinical outcomes of a modified subcutaneous pedicle advancement flap anoplasty emphasizing pivot point medialization, developed in collaboration with plastic surgeons.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 52 consecutive patients (aged 32-97 years; median, 67) treated between April 2021 and June 2025. The etiologies included postsurgical cicatricial stenosis (65.4%) and chronic anal fissure (34.6%). The technique involves establishing the pivot point-defined in this study as the biomechanical anchoring point at the deep subcutaneous fat layer-allowing tension-free advancement of the flap medially without rotation while preserving blood flow through the subcutaneous pedicle. Forty-nine patients completed the 6-month follow-up. Bougie examination at 6 months was performed without anesthesia during outpatient visits.

Results: Surgical success, defined as bougie passage of ≥22 mm (#9), was achieved in 48 of 49 patients (98.0%), with a median operative time of 24 min (range, 14-35 min). No flap necrosis occurred (0%). Complications included wound dehiscence in nine patients (17.3%), which healed conservatively within a median of 4 weeks, and rectal prolapse in one patient (1.9%). One patient (2.0%) showed insufficient dilation at 6 months and required reoperation at 12 months. No fecal incontinence was observed. Patient satisfaction at 3 months was high (very satisfied 63.5%, satisfied 21.2%, unchanged 15.4%, dissatisfied 0%).

Conclusion: This technique, utilizing pivot point medialization and straight advancement without rotation, may offer a safe and effective option for severe anal stenosis.

带支点中间化的皮下蒂推进皮瓣肛管成形术治疗肛门狭窄:一项单中心回顾性研究。
目的:严重的肛门狭窄,特别是白头畸形,提出了重大的重建挑战。本研究报告了与整形外科医生合作开发的改良的皮下蒂推进皮瓣成形术的临床结果,强调枢轴点中间化。方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年4月至2025年6月期间连续治疗的52例患者(年龄32-97岁,中位数67岁)的数据。病因包括术后瘢痕狭窄(65.4%)和慢性肛裂(34.6%)。该技术包括建立支点,在本研究中定义为皮下深层脂肪层的生物力学锚定点,允许皮瓣在不旋转的情况下向内侧无张力推进,同时保持血液通过皮下蒂。49例患者完成了6个月的随访。6个月时在门诊不麻醉的情况下进行Bougie检查。结果:49例患者中有48例(98.0%)手术成功,定义为肿胀通道≥22 mm(#9),中位手术时间为24分钟(范围14-35分钟)。无皮瓣坏死(0%)。并发症包括9例(17.3%)伤口裂开,保守愈合中位时间为4周,1例(1.9%)直肠脱垂。1例(2.0%)患者在6个月时出现扩张不足,12个月时需要再次手术。未见大便失禁。3个月患者满意度较高(非常满意63.5%,满意21.2%,不变15.4%,不满意0%)。结论:该技术利用枢轴点中间化和不旋转的直线推进,可以为严重肛管狭窄提供安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书