Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning with Clinical Features, the INTERCEPTOR Study Preliminary Model.

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23922/jarc.2025-106
David Mens, Soogyeong Shin, Farhan Akram, Andrew Stubbs, Michail Doukas, Cornelis Verhoef, Denise Hilling, Jan von der Thüsen
{"title":"Prediction of Pathological Complete Response after Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning with Clinical Features, the INTERCEPTOR Study Preliminary Model.","authors":"David Mens, Soogyeong Shin, Farhan Akram, Andrew Stubbs, Michail Doukas, Cornelis Verhoef, Denise Hilling, Jan von der Thüsen","doi":"10.23922/jarc.2025-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Organ-preserving strategies are increasingly used in rectal cancer for those achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), CRT may not significantly impact local recurrence or overall survival when an R0 resection is feasible. Accurate pretreatment prediction of pCR is critical to assist patients in deciding on CRT when it may not be oncologically required. The initial phase of the ongoing INTERCEPTOR study evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models using pretreatment clinical variables could improve pCR prediction beyond the baseline probability of 15-20%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with LARC who received CRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2004 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Eligible patients received ≥25 fractions of CRT (50.0-50.4 Gy with concomitant capecitabine) and surgery ≥6 weeks after CRT. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Feature importance was assessed with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and XGBoost feature importance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 238 included patients, 30 (12.6%) achieved pCR. The number of radiologically positive lymph nodes was the strongest single predictor, but with limited discriminative power (AUROC 0.65 ± 0.04, sensitivity 0.83 ± 0.15 and specificity 0.45 ± 0.1). Combining positive node count with additional clinical variables led to a modest improvement in performance. SHAP analysis confirmed positive lymph node count was the most influential predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pretreatment clinical variables alone provide poor-to-fair accuracy for predicting pCR after CRT in LARC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","volume":"10 3","pages":"384-391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2025-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Organ-preserving strategies are increasingly used in rectal cancer for those achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), CRT may not significantly impact local recurrence or overall survival when an R0 resection is feasible. Accurate pretreatment prediction of pCR is critical to assist patients in deciding on CRT when it may not be oncologically required. The initial phase of the ongoing INTERCEPTOR study evaluated whether machine learning (ML) models using pretreatment clinical variables could improve pCR prediction beyond the baseline probability of 15-20%.

Methods: Patients with LARC who received CRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2004 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Eligible patients received ≥25 fractions of CRT (50.0-50.4 Gy with concomitant capecitabine) and surgery ≥6 weeks after CRT. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Feature importance was assessed with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and XGBoost feature importance.

Results: Among 238 included patients, 30 (12.6%) achieved pCR. The number of radiologically positive lymph nodes was the strongest single predictor, but with limited discriminative power (AUROC 0.65 ± 0.04, sensitivity 0.83 ± 0.15 and specificity 0.45 ± 0.1). Combining positive node count with additional clinical variables led to a modest improvement in performance. SHAP analysis confirmed positive lymph node count was the most influential predictor.

Conclusion: Pretreatment clinical variables alone provide poor-to-fair accuracy for predicting pCR after CRT in LARC.

使用具有临床特征的机器学习预测局部晚期直肠癌放化疗后病理完全缓解,INTERCEPTOR研究初步模型。
背景:对于那些在放化疗(CRT)后达到病理完全缓解(pCR)的直肠癌患者,越来越多地使用器官保存策略。在局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)中,当R0切除可行时,CRT可能不会显著影响局部复发或总体生存。准确的pCR预处理预测对于帮助患者在肿瘤不需要时决定是否进行CRT至关重要。正在进行的INTERCEPTOR研究的初始阶段评估了使用预处理临床变量的机器学习(ML)模型是否可以提高pCR预测的基线概率,超过15-20%。方法:分析2004年至2018年在三级转诊中心接受CRT后全肠系膜切除术的LARC患者。符合条件的患者接受≥25次放射治疗(50.0-50.4 Gy,同时使用卡培他滨),并在放射治疗后≥6周接受手术。极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型经过5次交叉验证。采用AUROC、敏感性和特异性评估模型性能。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)和XGBoost特征重要性评估特征重要性。结果:238例患者中,30例(12.6%)实现pCR。放射学阳性淋巴结数是最强的单一预测因子,但鉴别能力有限(AUROC 0.65±0.04,敏感性0.83±0.15,特异性0.45±0.1)。结合阳性淋巴结计数与其他临床变量导致性能适度改善。SHAP分析证实淋巴结计数阳性是最具影响的预测因子。结论:单独的预处理临床变量对预测LARC CRT后pCR的准确性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书