Evaluating the Impact of hydration on electrodermal activity: A Comparison between AC bioimpedance and DC skin potential metrics.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Pub Date : 2026-07-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2478/joeb-2026-0008
Ardawan A Youssif, Dindar S Bari, Haval Y Yacoob Aldosky
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of hydration on electrodermal activity: A Comparison between AC bioimpedance and DC skin potential metrics.","authors":"Ardawan A Youssif, Dindar S Bari, Haval Y Yacoob Aldosky","doi":"10.2478/joeb-2026-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the comparative sensitivity and stability of tonic and phasic electrodermal activity (EDA) parameters, specifically skin conductance (SC), susceptance (SS), and potential (SP), following a localized moisturizer intervention. Utilizing a single-group pretest-posttest design (N = 55), the research demonstrates that AC bioimpedance-based metrics (SC and SS) exhibit distinct response dynamics compared to conventional DC-based measures. Tonic-level analysis revealed that SCL and SSL produced nearly identical relative percentage increases (52.6%) compared to SPL (34.46%). While SCL provided the largest absolute change, SSL emerged as the most statistically stable indicator across the cohort, characterized by a highly uniform signal-to-noise ratio (d = 1.23). Phasic analysis revealed that Skin Susceptance Responses (ΔSSRs) demonstrated a highly pronounced downward shift following the intervention, characterized by a -70.2% change from baseline. This negative shift was significantly divergent from the potential response (p < 0.001, d = -0.55), highlighting a distinct directional sensitivity for ΔSSRs under these experimental conditions. These findings suggest that AC-based EDA parameters are highly responsive to the resistive and capacitive shifts within the stratum corneum interface. The results suggest that for applications evaluating localized skin surface changes, a multimodal approach incorporating AC bioimpedance-based metrics may provide a highly responsive framework for detecting acute alterations at the electrode-skin interface compared with traditional potential-based measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":38125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","volume":"17 1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13428627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/joeb-2026-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the comparative sensitivity and stability of tonic and phasic electrodermal activity (EDA) parameters, specifically skin conductance (SC), susceptance (SS), and potential (SP), following a localized moisturizer intervention. Utilizing a single-group pretest-posttest design (N = 55), the research demonstrates that AC bioimpedance-based metrics (SC and SS) exhibit distinct response dynamics compared to conventional DC-based measures. Tonic-level analysis revealed that SCL and SSL produced nearly identical relative percentage increases (52.6%) compared to SPL (34.46%). While SCL provided the largest absolute change, SSL emerged as the most statistically stable indicator across the cohort, characterized by a highly uniform signal-to-noise ratio (d = 1.23). Phasic analysis revealed that Skin Susceptance Responses (ΔSSRs) demonstrated a highly pronounced downward shift following the intervention, characterized by a -70.2% change from baseline. This negative shift was significantly divergent from the potential response (p < 0.001, d = -0.55), highlighting a distinct directional sensitivity for ΔSSRs under these experimental conditions. These findings suggest that AC-based EDA parameters are highly responsive to the resistive and capacitive shifts within the stratum corneum interface. The results suggest that for applications evaluating localized skin surface changes, a multimodal approach incorporating AC bioimpedance-based metrics may provide a highly responsive framework for detecting acute alterations at the electrode-skin interface compared with traditional potential-based measurements.

评价水合作用对皮肤电活动的影响:交流生物阻抗和直流皮肤电位指标的比较。
本研究评估了局部润肤霜干预后,皮肤电导(SC)、电纳(SS)和电位(SP)等皮肤电活性(EDA)参数的相对敏感性和稳定性。利用单组前测后测设计(N = 55),研究表明,与传统的基于直流的测量相比,基于交流的生物阻抗指标(SC和SS)表现出不同的响应动态。tonic水平分析显示,与SPL(34.46%)相比,SCL和SSL产生了几乎相同的相对百分比增加(52.6%)。虽然SCL提供了最大的绝对变化,但SSL是整个队列中统计上最稳定的指标,其特征是高度均匀的信噪比(d = 1.23)。相位分析显示,皮肤敏感反应(ΔSSRs)在干预后表现出高度明显的下降,与基线相比变化为-70.2%。这种负位移与潜在响应显著不同(p < 0.001, d = -0.55),突出了在这些实验条件下ΔSSRs具有明显的方向敏感性。这些结果表明,基于交流的EDA参数对角质层界面内的电阻和电容位移具有高度响应。结果表明,对于评估局部皮肤表面变化的应用,与传统的基于电位的测量相比,结合交流生物阻抗的多模态方法可以提供一个高度响应的框架,用于检测电极-皮肤界面的急性变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance
Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书