Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness for Hysteroscopically Assisted Falloposcopic Tuboplasty in Women with Proximal Tubal Infertility.

IF 2.1 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2026-07-17 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00036
Atsushi Fukui, Ayano Yamaya, Rie Fukuhara, Seiji Mabuchi, Yoshihito Yokoyama
{"title":"Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness for Hysteroscopically Assisted Falloposcopic Tuboplasty in Women with Proximal Tubal Infertility.","authors":"Atsushi Fukui, Ayano Yamaya, Rie Fukuhara, Seiji Mabuchi, Yoshihito Yokoyama","doi":"10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tubal infertility accounts for approximately 30% of infertility cases in women. Falloposcopic tuboplasty (FT) is used in women with proximal tubal obstruction. However, it is technically challenging because of difficulties in locating the tubal ostium and confirming success. To address these challenges, we developed a hysteroscopically assisted FT (HA-FT). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HA-FT in women with tubal infertility.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective unblinded study included infertile women with proximal tubal obstruction who desired a natural conception. HA-FT was performed under either intravenous or general anesthesia. Postoperative hysterosalpingography was performed in an operating room to confirm success. Success and pregnancy rates of HA-FT were compared with those of regular FT (Reg-FT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regular FT (<i>n</i> = 73; 119 tubes) was performed before 2013, and HA-FT (<i>n</i> = 72; 136 tubes) was introduced thereafter. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Operative time was not significantly different (Reg-FT: 37.7 ± 18.7 min vs. HA-FT: 44.3 ± 18.2 min). The success rate per patient was significantly higher in a HA-FT group (72/72,100%) than that in a Reg-FT group (63/73, 86.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Similarly, success rate per tube was significantly higher for HA-FT (135/136, 99.3%) than that for Reg-FT (95/119, 79.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Natural pregnancy rates were similar between the groups (HA-FT: 20/58, 34.4%; Reg-FT: 20/61, 32.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HA-FT is a safe, effective, and reliable method for the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction. Its natural pregnancy rates are acceptable, making it a promising option for women with tubal infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"15 3","pages":"247-253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Tubal infertility accounts for approximately 30% of infertility cases in women. Falloposcopic tuboplasty (FT) is used in women with proximal tubal obstruction. However, it is technically challenging because of difficulties in locating the tubal ostium and confirming success. To address these challenges, we developed a hysteroscopically assisted FT (HA-FT). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of HA-FT in women with tubal infertility.

Materials and methods: This prospective unblinded study included infertile women with proximal tubal obstruction who desired a natural conception. HA-FT was performed under either intravenous or general anesthesia. Postoperative hysterosalpingography was performed in an operating room to confirm success. Success and pregnancy rates of HA-FT were compared with those of regular FT (Reg-FT).

Results: Regular FT (n = 73; 119 tubes) was performed before 2013, and HA-FT (n = 72; 136 tubes) was introduced thereafter. Patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Operative time was not significantly different (Reg-FT: 37.7 ± 18.7 min vs. HA-FT: 44.3 ± 18.2 min). The success rate per patient was significantly higher in a HA-FT group (72/72,100%) than that in a Reg-FT group (63/73, 86.3%, P < 0.05). Similarly, success rate per tube was significantly higher for HA-FT (135/136, 99.3%) than that for Reg-FT (95/119, 79.8%; P < 0.01). Natural pregnancy rates were similar between the groups (HA-FT: 20/58, 34.4%; Reg-FT: 20/61, 32.7%).

Conclusion: HA-FT is a safe, effective, and reliable method for the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction. Its natural pregnancy rates are acceptable, making it a promising option for women with tubal infertility.

宫腔镜辅助输卵管成形术治疗近端输卵管不孕症的安全性和有效性评价。
目的:输卵管性不孕症约占女性不孕症病例的30%。输卵管成形术(FT)用于妇女近端输卵管阻塞。然而,由于难以定位输卵管开口并确认成功,因此在技术上具有挑战性。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了宫腔镜辅助FT (HA-FT)。本研究旨在评价HA-FT治疗输卵管性不孕症的疗效。材料和方法:这项前瞻性非盲研究纳入了希望自然受孕的输卵管近端梗阻不孕妇女。HA-FT在静脉或全身麻醉下进行。术后子宫输卵管造影在手术室进行,以确认成功。将HA-FT与常规FT (regg -FT)的成功率和妊娠率进行比较。结果:2013年以前行常规FT (n = 73, 119管),2013年以后行HA-FT (n = 72, 136管)。两组患者特征相似。regg - ft: 37.7±18.7 min, HA-FT: 44.3±18.2 min。HA-FT组患者的成功率(72/72,100%)明显高于regg - ft组(63/ 73,86.3%,P < 0.05)。HA-FT的单管成功率(135/136,99.3%)显著高于regg - ft (95/119, 79.8%, P < 0.01)。各组自然妊娠率相似(HA-FT: 20/58, 34.4%; regg - ft: 20/61, 32.7%)。结论:HA-FT是治疗输卵管近端梗阻的一种安全、有效、可靠的方法。它的自然怀孕率是可以接受的,使其成为输卵管不孕妇女的一个有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书