Prediction of Orthodontic Extraction Decisions Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Retrospective Study.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-07-29 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4317/jced.64288
Alah Dawood Aldawoody, Shehab Ahmed Hamad
{"title":"Prediction of Orthodontic Extraction Decisions Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Alah Dawood Aldawoody, Shehab Ahmed Hamad","doi":"10.4317/jced.64288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthodontic extraction decision-making remains difficult and highly subjective, particularly in marginal cases where the clinicalcues are ambiguous. Objectives: To design machine learning (ML) models for prediction of extraction vs. non-extraction decision-making and estimate the influenceof key clinical predictors on such decisions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed on 120 patients with extraction and 80 patients without extraction from asample of pretreatment records over 2 years. Five ML models including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support VectorMachine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT) and XGBoost are employed in this research by applying Python's Scikit-learn. The datasetwas divided in two parts for training and testing at a ratio of 70:30. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC-ROCwere used to evaluate and compare the performance of the models. In order to rank the most important features for decision-making, feature importance was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RF model provided the highest accuracy (93.5%) and AUC-ROC (0.95) values, whereas XGBoost was the second-bestmodel, with accuracy (90.2%) and AUC-ROC (0.92). Mandibular crowding (weight = 0.28) and IMPA (L1-MP angle,weight = 0.22) were the most influential predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ensemble ML models, in particular RF, yield a promising objective methodology for clinical decision support in orthodontics topotentially lessen inter-clinician variation and enhance consistency in treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"18 8","pages":"e990-e997"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13428306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.64288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic extraction decision-making remains difficult and highly subjective, particularly in marginal cases where the clinicalcues are ambiguous. Objectives: To design machine learning (ML) models for prediction of extraction vs. non-extraction decision-making and estimate the influenceof key clinical predictors on such decisions.

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 120 patients with extraction and 80 patients without extraction from asample of pretreatment records over 2 years. Five ML models including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support VectorMachine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT) and XGBoost are employed in this research by applying Python's Scikit-learn. The datasetwas divided in two parts for training and testing at a ratio of 70:30. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC-ROCwere used to evaluate and compare the performance of the models. In order to rank the most important features for decision-making, feature importance was calculated.

Results: RF model provided the highest accuracy (93.5%) and AUC-ROC (0.95) values, whereas XGBoost was the second-bestmodel, with accuracy (90.2%) and AUC-ROC (0.92). Mandibular crowding (weight = 0.28) and IMPA (L1-MP angle,weight = 0.22) were the most influential predictors.

Conclusions: Ensemble ML models, in particular RF, yield a promising objective methodology for clinical decision support in orthodontics topotentially lessen inter-clinician variation and enhance consistency in treatment planning.

使用机器学习算法预测正畸拔牙决策:一项回顾性研究。
背景:正畸拔牙决策仍然困难且高度主观,特别是在临床线索不明确的边缘病例中。目的:设计机器学习(ML)模型来预测拔牙与非拔牙的决策,并估计关键临床预测因素对此类决策的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析2年来预处理记录标本中有提取的120例和未提取的80例。本研究采用了逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、决策树(DT)和XGBoost 5种机器学习模型,应用Python的Scikit-learn。数据集分为训练和测试两部分,比例为70:30。采用敏感性、特异性、准确性和auc - roc对模型的性能进行评价和比较。为了对最重要的特征进行排序,计算特征重要性。结果:RF模型准确率最高(93.5%),AUC-ROC值为0.95,XGBoost模型准确率次之(90.2%),AUC-ROC值为0.92。下颌拥挤度(体重= 0.28)和IMPA (L1-MP角,体重= 0.22)是影响最大的预测因子。结论:集成ML模型,特别是RF,为正畸临床决策支持提供了一种有前途的客观方法,可以减少临床医生之间的差异,增强治疗计划的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书