Development of economic selection indexes for beef-on-dairy systems and implication for sire re-ranking in U.S. production systems.

IF 1.9 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2026-07-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txag107
Larissa E Meier, Bruce L Golden, Scott Newman, Matthew L Spangler
{"title":"Development of economic selection indexes for beef-on-dairy systems and implication for sire re-ranking in U.S. production systems.","authors":"Larissa E Meier, Bruce L Golden, Scott Newman, Matthew L Spangler","doi":"10.1093/tas/txag107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid expansion of beef-on-dairy (B×D) crossbreeding in the United States has increased the need for selection tools tailored to this unique production system. The objectives of this study were to develop economic selection indexes specific to B×D systems under U.S. conditions and to evaluate the extent of sire re-ranking relative to conventional beef-on-beef (B×B) indexes. The current study utilized iGENDEC, a web-based decision support platform hosted by the Beef Improvement Federation. iGENDEC enables users to enter enterprise-specific information related to breeding goals, breeding systems, economic costs/returns, and current phenotypic performance. Using stochastic simulation, iGENDEC creates a simulated population informed by the user's parameters to enable calculation of the marginal economic value of each trait in the specified breeding objective. Using iGENDEC, economic selection indexes were constructed for multiple crossbreeding scenarios incorporating traits related to carcass merit, feed intake, and calving performance. Beef bulls (<i>n</i> = 27,123) were evaluated to quantify differences in ranking across production systems and index assumptions. Results indicated that BxD systems placed greater economic emphasis on feed intake and hot carcass weight, while B×B systems placed more emphasis on carcass marbling. Despite strong Spearman rank correlations between indexes (average = 0.931), only 70.7% of the 100 top-ranked sires overlapped between B×D and B×B systems, indicating meaningful differences in sire selection. Differences in production assumptions, including carcass weight targets and days on feed, further influenced economic weights and selection outcomes. Opportunity costs associated with using B×B-based indexes in B×D systems averaged $3.24 per exposure with a maximum value of $8.26 per exposure. These findings demonstrate that even small differences in index construction can lead to suboptimal sire selection and reduced profitability. Consequently, selection indexes should be tailored to specific production environments to ensure alignment with economic drivers and to maximize genetic progress in beef-on-dairy systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"txag107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txag107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid expansion of beef-on-dairy (B×D) crossbreeding in the United States has increased the need for selection tools tailored to this unique production system. The objectives of this study were to develop economic selection indexes specific to B×D systems under U.S. conditions and to evaluate the extent of sire re-ranking relative to conventional beef-on-beef (B×B) indexes. The current study utilized iGENDEC, a web-based decision support platform hosted by the Beef Improvement Federation. iGENDEC enables users to enter enterprise-specific information related to breeding goals, breeding systems, economic costs/returns, and current phenotypic performance. Using stochastic simulation, iGENDEC creates a simulated population informed by the user's parameters to enable calculation of the marginal economic value of each trait in the specified breeding objective. Using iGENDEC, economic selection indexes were constructed for multiple crossbreeding scenarios incorporating traits related to carcass merit, feed intake, and calving performance. Beef bulls (n = 27,123) were evaluated to quantify differences in ranking across production systems and index assumptions. Results indicated that BxD systems placed greater economic emphasis on feed intake and hot carcass weight, while B×B systems placed more emphasis on carcass marbling. Despite strong Spearman rank correlations between indexes (average = 0.931), only 70.7% of the 100 top-ranked sires overlapped between B×D and B×B systems, indicating meaningful differences in sire selection. Differences in production assumptions, including carcass weight targets and days on feed, further influenced economic weights and selection outcomes. Opportunity costs associated with using B×B-based indexes in B×D systems averaged $3.24 per exposure with a maximum value of $8.26 per exposure. These findings demonstrate that even small differences in index construction can lead to suboptimal sire selection and reduced profitability. Consequently, selection indexes should be tailored to specific production environments to ensure alignment with economic drivers and to maximize genetic progress in beef-on-dairy systems.

牛配乳系统经济选择指标的发展及其对美国生产系统父系再排序的启示。
在美国,牛乳杂交(B×D)的迅速发展增加了对适合这种独特生产系统的选择工具的需求。本研究的目的是在美国条件下开发B×D系统特有的经济选择指标,并评估相对于传统牛肉对牛肉(B×B)指标的父系重新排序程度。目前的研究利用了iGENDEC,这是一个由牛肉改良联合会主办的基于网络的决策支持平台。iGENDEC允许用户输入与育种目标、育种系统、经济成本/回报和当前表型表现相关的企业特定信息。使用随机模拟,iGENDEC根据用户的参数创建一个模拟种群,以便计算指定育种目标中每个性状的边际经济价值。利用iGENDEC构建了包含胴体品质、采食量和产犊性能相关性状的多种杂交方案的经济选择指标。对肉牛(n = 27,123)进行了评估,以量化不同生产系统和指数假设之间的排名差异。结果表明,BxD系统更注重采食量和热胴体重,而B×B系统更注重胴体大理石纹。尽管各指标之间有很强的Spearman秩相关(平均= 0.931),但在排名前100位的系中,只有70.7%的系在B×D和B×B系统之间重叠,表明在系选择上存在显著差异。生产假设的差异,包括胴体重目标和饲喂天数,进一步影响经济权重和选择结果。在B×D系统中使用B×B-based指数的机会成本平均为每次曝光3.24美元,每次曝光的最大值为8.26美元。这些发现表明,即使是指数构建上的微小差异也会导致次优的父系选择和盈利能力的降低。因此,选择指标应根据具体的生产环境进行调整,以确保与经济驱动因素保持一致,并最大限度地提高牛乳结合系统的遗传进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书