"It's Not Just Cost": Barriers to Mammography Screening Access Among Low-income Women in the United States-A Scoping Review.

IF 2.5 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2026-07-30 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.15430/JCP.26.013
Julia Messerman, Callia Nickels, Nigel James
{"title":"\"It's Not Just Cost\": Barriers to Mammography Screening Access Among Low-income Women in the United States-A Scoping Review.","authors":"Julia Messerman, Callia Nickels, Nigel James","doi":"10.15430/JCP.26.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the recognized importance of early detection, disparities in mammography access persist among low-income women in the United States. While financial barriers are often emphasized, less is known about how multiple barriers interact to shape access to screening. We conducted a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to synthesize evidence on barriers to mammography access among low-income women in the United States. A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar identified peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025, of which 47 met inclusion criteria. Extracted barriers were categorized into five domains: financial, structural, informational, cultural/social, and systemic. Barriers were multidimensional and frequently co-occurred across domains. Structural barriers, including transportation challenges and limited clinic availability, were the most reported, followed by financial and informational constraints. Cultural factors such as fear, stigma, and mistrust, along with systemic issues including provider bias and fragmented care coordination, further constrained access. Across studies, barriers rarely operated in isolation but instead reinforced one another, producing layered disadvantage that limited both screening uptake and follow-up care. These findings highlight the need for integrated, multi-level interventions that address structural, informational, and systemic barriers simultaneously. Expanding insurance coverage alone is insufficient; improving access will require strengthening patient navigation, enhancing care coordination, and embedding culturally responsive approaches within health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":"31 3","pages":"107-115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13423739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.26.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the recognized importance of early detection, disparities in mammography access persist among low-income women in the United States. While financial barriers are often emphasized, less is known about how multiple barriers interact to shape access to screening. We conducted a scoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to synthesize evidence on barriers to mammography access among low-income women in the United States. A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar identified peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025, of which 47 met inclusion criteria. Extracted barriers were categorized into five domains: financial, structural, informational, cultural/social, and systemic. Barriers were multidimensional and frequently co-occurred across domains. Structural barriers, including transportation challenges and limited clinic availability, were the most reported, followed by financial and informational constraints. Cultural factors such as fear, stigma, and mistrust, along with systemic issues including provider bias and fragmented care coordination, further constrained access. Across studies, barriers rarely operated in isolation but instead reinforced one another, producing layered disadvantage that limited both screening uptake and follow-up care. These findings highlight the need for integrated, multi-level interventions that address structural, informational, and systemic barriers simultaneously. Expanding insurance coverage alone is insufficient; improving access will require strengthening patient navigation, enhancing care coordination, and embedding culturally responsive approaches within health systems.

“不仅仅是成本问题”:美国低收入妇女获得乳房x光检查的障碍——一项范围审查。
尽管人们认识到早期检测的重要性,但在美国低收入妇女中,获得乳房x光检查的机会仍然存在差距。虽然经常强调经济障碍,但人们对多重障碍如何相互作用影响筛查机会知之甚少。我们按照系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析扩展范围评价指南进行了范围评价,以综合美国低收入妇女获得乳房x光检查障碍的证据。通过对PubMed、CINAHL和b谷歌Scholar的系统搜索,确定了2010年至2025年间发表的同行评议研究,其中47项符合纳入标准。提取的障碍分为五个领域:金融、结构、信息、文化/社会和系统。障碍是多维的,并且经常跨领域共同发生。结构性障碍,包括交通挑战和有限的诊所可用性,是报告最多的,其次是财政和信息限制。文化因素,如恐惧、耻辱和不信任,以及系统问题,如提供者偏见和分散的护理协调,进一步限制了获取。在所有研究中,障碍很少孤立地起作用,而是相互加强,产生分层的劣势,限制了筛查的接受和后续护理。这些发现突出表明,需要采取综合、多层次的干预措施,同时解决结构性、信息性和系统性障碍。仅仅扩大保险覆盖面是不够的;改善可及性将需要加强患者导航,加强护理协调,并在卫生系统中嵌入符合文化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书