Assessment of pricing, availability, and affordability of essential medicines in a resource-limited setting.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2701916
Faiza Inayat, Nasir Mahmood, Bashir Ahmad, Muhammad Sheeraz Ahmad
{"title":"Assessment of pricing, availability, and affordability of essential medicines in a resource-limited setting.","authors":"Faiza Inayat, Nasir Mahmood, Bashir Ahmad, Muhammad Sheeraz Ahmad","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2701916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to essential medicine is a worldwide issue, driven by high prices, low affordability and limited availability. Under funded health systems, weak local production, poor supply chain governance, and discriminatory policies are the main hurdles. Low and middle-income countries are continuously making efforts to improve healthcare services. To evaluate the extent to which the intended objectives have been met, the present study undertakes an investigation into the pricing, availability, and affordability of selected essential medicines in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 50 essential medicines, including 14 from the global core list and 36 selected from the national essential medicine list, was carried out from November 2025 to February 2026, using an adaptation of WHO/HAI methodology in five geographical areas of Pakistan. Data were acquired from 9 pharmacies of government hospitals and 18 retail pharmacies of the private sector. Prices were evaluated on the basis of the Median Price Ratio (MPR); affordability was determined by estimating how many days a minimum salaried employee of the government must spend to buy the prescribed regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the public sector mean availability was 12.65% (IB), 36.2% (LPG) and in private sector it was 45.7% (IB) and 55.2% (LPG). In private retail pharmacies, 13.61% were stocked with oncology medicines. Median price ratios in the private sector varied between 0.11-6.85 for LPG and 0.17-23.37 for IB. Median price ratio of 12 medicines (out of 36 calculated for MPR) was approximately similar between LPG and IB. However, prices for cardiovascular and antidiabetic medicines increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Availability of LPGs has improved in the private sector. Median price ratios have decreased over time, but medicines are still unaffordable, especially for diabetes, viral, fungal and bacterial infectious diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2701916"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2701916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to essential medicine is a worldwide issue, driven by high prices, low affordability and limited availability. Under funded health systems, weak local production, poor supply chain governance, and discriminatory policies are the main hurdles. Low and middle-income countries are continuously making efforts to improve healthcare services. To evaluate the extent to which the intended objectives have been met, the present study undertakes an investigation into the pricing, availability, and affordability of selected essential medicines in Pakistan.

Methods: A survey of 50 essential medicines, including 14 from the global core list and 36 selected from the national essential medicine list, was carried out from November 2025 to February 2026, using an adaptation of WHO/HAI methodology in five geographical areas of Pakistan. Data were acquired from 9 pharmacies of government hospitals and 18 retail pharmacies of the private sector. Prices were evaluated on the basis of the Median Price Ratio (MPR); affordability was determined by estimating how many days a minimum salaried employee of the government must spend to buy the prescribed regimen.

Results: In the public sector mean availability was 12.65% (IB), 36.2% (LPG) and in private sector it was 45.7% (IB) and 55.2% (LPG). In private retail pharmacies, 13.61% were stocked with oncology medicines. Median price ratios in the private sector varied between 0.11-6.85 for LPG and 0.17-23.37 for IB. Median price ratio of 12 medicines (out of 36 calculated for MPR) was approximately similar between LPG and IB. However, prices for cardiovascular and antidiabetic medicines increased.

Conclusion: Availability of LPGs has improved in the private sector. Median price ratios have decreased over time, but medicines are still unaffordable, especially for diabetes, viral, fungal and bacterial infectious diseases.

在资源有限的情况下评估基本药物的定价、可得性和可负担性。
背景:获得基本药物是一个全球性问题,其驱动因素是价格高、负担能力低和可得性有限。在资金充足的卫生系统下,当地生产薄弱、供应链治理不善和歧视性政策是主要障碍。低收入和中等收入国家正在不断努力改善保健服务。为了评估预期目标实现的程度,本研究对巴基斯坦选定基本药物的定价、可得性和可负担性进行了调查。方法:从2025年11月至2026年2月,在巴基斯坦5个地理区域采用WHO/HAI方法,对50种基本药物进行了调查,其中14种来自全球核心清单,36种来自国家基本药物清单。数据来自政府医院的9家药房和私营部门的18家零售药房。根据中位数价格比率(MPR)对价格进行评估;可负担性是通过估算政府最低工资雇员必须花费多少天来购买规定的方案来确定的。结果:公共部门的平均可用性为12.65% (IB), 36.2% (LPG),私营部门的平均可用性为45.7% (IB)和55.2% (LPG)。在私营零售药房中,有13.61%的药房备有肿瘤药物。私营部门LPG的中位价格比率在0.11-6.85之间,IB的中位价格比率在0.17-23.37之间。LPG和IB之间的中位价格比率(按MPR计算的36种药物中)大致相似。然而,心血管和抗糖尿病药物的价格有所上升。结论:液化石油气在私营部门的可用性有所改善。随着时间的推移,中位数价格比率有所下降,但药品仍然负担不起,特别是糖尿病、病毒、真菌和细菌传染病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书