Seminuclear Flip Phacoemulsification for Soft Nuclear Cataract Surgery: A New Soft Nucleus Cataract Chopping Technique.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2026-07-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/9448941
Han Wang, Zebin Li, Rubing Liu, Furong Luo, Jifa Kuang, Jing Yang, Beiling Tan, Hong He, Mingbing Zeng
{"title":"Seminuclear Flip Phacoemulsification for Soft Nuclear Cataract Surgery: A New Soft Nucleus Cataract Chopping Technique.","authors":"Han Wang, Zebin Li, Rubing Liu, Furong Luo, Jifa Kuang, Jing Yang, Beiling Tan, Hong He, Mingbing Zeng","doi":"10.1155/joph/9448941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To introduce and evaluate the seminuclear flip phacoemulsification (SNFP), a new soft nucleus cataract phacoemulsification surgical technique, in comparison with the conventional quick-chop phacoemulsification (QCP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the Emery-Little Classification System for grading nuclear opacity, 176 cases with nuclear hardness of Grades 1 and 2 were divided into two groups; one group received SNFP, and the control group underwent QCP. The intraoperative ultrasound time, ultrasound energy, complications, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and central corneal endothelial cell density were evaluated to determine the advantages of the new technique over conventional surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ultrasound time was significantly shorter in the SNFP group than in the QCP group (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The difference in the ultrasound energy between the groups was not statistically significant. Two cases of posterior capsule rupture were observed in the QCP group, while no such case was observed in the SNFP group. There was no significant difference in visual acuity or central corneal thickness between the two groups before the operation or 1 day, 7 days, or 1 month after the operation. There was no significant difference in the density of central corneal endothelial cells between the two groups before and 1 month after the operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SNFP can improve the efficiency of phacoemulsification and reduce the complication risk in soft nucleus cataract surgery. <b>Trial Registration:</b> Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2200063495.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"9448941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/9448941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To introduce and evaluate the seminuclear flip phacoemulsification (SNFP), a new soft nucleus cataract phacoemulsification surgical technique, in comparison with the conventional quick-chop phacoemulsification (QCP).

Design: Prospective observational study.

Methods: According to the Emery-Little Classification System for grading nuclear opacity, 176 cases with nuclear hardness of Grades 1 and 2 were divided into two groups; one group received SNFP, and the control group underwent QCP. The intraoperative ultrasound time, ultrasound energy, complications, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, and central corneal endothelial cell density were evaluated to determine the advantages of the new technique over conventional surgery.

Results: The ultrasound time was significantly shorter in the SNFP group than in the QCP group (p = 0.01). The difference in the ultrasound energy between the groups was not statistically significant. Two cases of posterior capsule rupture were observed in the QCP group, while no such case was observed in the SNFP group. There was no significant difference in visual acuity or central corneal thickness between the two groups before the operation or 1 day, 7 days, or 1 month after the operation. There was no significant difference in the density of central corneal endothelial cells between the two groups before and 1 month after the operation.

Conclusions: SNFP can improve the efficiency of phacoemulsification and reduce the complication risk in soft nucleus cataract surgery. Trial Registration: Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2200063495.

软核白内障半核翻转超声乳化手术:一种新的软核白内障斩除技术。
目的:介绍和评价一种新型软核白内障超声乳化术——半核翻转超声乳化术(SNFP),并与传统的快速剪切超声乳化术(QCP)进行比较。设计:前瞻性观察研究。方法:将176例核硬度为1级和2级的患者按照金刚砂-利特氏分级系统进行核不透明分级;1组采用SNFP,对照组采用QCP。评估术中超声时间、超声能量、并发症、术后最佳矫正视力、角膜中央厚度和角膜中央内皮细胞密度,以确定新技术相对于传统手术的优势。结果:SNFP组超声时间明显短于QCP组(p = 0.01)。两组间超声能量差异无统计学意义。QCP组2例后囊破裂,SNFP组无后囊破裂。两组患者术前、术后1天、7天、1个月的视力及角膜中央厚度差异均无统计学意义。两组患者术前及术后1个月角膜中央内皮细胞密度差异无统计学意义。结论:SNFP可提高软核白内障超声乳化手术的成功率,降低手术并发症的发生。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2200063495。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书