Transfusion intensity in the ICU: Reasons and triggers.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1111/trf.70350
Merijn C Reuland, Senta J Raasveld, Jimmy Schenk, Claudia van den Oord, Sanne de Bruin, Caroline M Schaap, Andrew W J Flint, Jan Bakker, Maurizio Cecconi, Aarne Feldheiser, Jens Meier, Thomas W L Scheeren, Tarikul Hamid, Michaël Piagnerelli, Tina Tomić Mahečić, Jan Benes, Lene Russell, Hernan Aguirre-Bermeo, Konstantina Triantafyllopoulou, Vasiliki Chantziara, Mohan Gurjar, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Vincenzo Pota, Muhammed Elhadi, Ryszard Gawda, Mafalda Mourisco, Marcus Lance, Vojislava Neskovic, Matej Podbregar, Juan V Llau, Manuel Quintana-Diaz, Maria Cronhjort, Carmen A Pfortmueller, Nihan Yapici, Nathan D Nielsen, Akshay Shah, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Zoe McQuilten, Cécile Aubron, Alexander P J Vlaar, Marcella C A Müller
{"title":"Transfusion intensity in the ICU: Reasons and triggers.","authors":"Merijn C Reuland, Senta J Raasveld, Jimmy Schenk, Claudia van den Oord, Sanne de Bruin, Caroline M Schaap, Andrew W J Flint, Jan Bakker, Maurizio Cecconi, Aarne Feldheiser, Jens Meier, Thomas W L Scheeren, Tarikul Hamid, Michaël Piagnerelli, Tina Tomić Mahečić, Jan Benes, Lene Russell, Hernan Aguirre-Bermeo, Konstantina Triantafyllopoulou, Vasiliki Chantziara, Mohan Gurjar, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Vincenzo Pota, Muhammed Elhadi, Ryszard Gawda, Mafalda Mourisco, Marcus Lance, Vojislava Neskovic, Matej Podbregar, Juan V Llau, Manuel Quintana-Diaz, Maria Cronhjort, Carmen A Pfortmueller, Nihan Yapici, Nathan D Nielsen, Akshay Shah, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Zoe McQuilten, Cécile Aubron, Alexander P J Vlaar, Marcella C A Müller","doi":"10.1111/trf.70350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reasons and physiological triggers for blood transfusion in critically ill patients are not well characterized. Beyond hemoglobin levels, hemodynamic instability is frequently cited, but its role across clinical contexts remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) To determine whether reasons and triggers for RBC transfusion differ across intensive care unit (ICU) days with varying transfusion intensity. (2) To describe reasons for non-RBC transfusions across these intensity groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This sub-study of the prospective International Point Prevalence Study of Intensive Care Unit Transfusion Practices (InPUT) classified ICU days by transfusion intensity: nonmajor (1 RBC unit), major (≥2 units), and massive (≥6 units in a single event, ≥10 per day, or Massive Transfusion Protocol activation). ICU days without transfusion for active bleeding were classified as no bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the multivariate composition of reasons for RBC transfusion were observed across intensity groups on permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Hypotension was the most frequently cited physiological trigger in nonmajor (54%, n = 80/148) and major transfusions (68%, n = 196/288), but less frequent in massive transfusions (30%, n = 14/64). Tachycardia was the second most common trigger in nonmajor (37%, n = 80/148), major (40%, n = 116/288), and massive transfusions (22%, n = 19/64).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBC transfusions are administered for distinct, intensity-dependent combinations of reasons and triggers. Transfusion intensity and clinical context are therefore key factors in evaluating transfusion practices. Among bleeding critically ill patients, hypotension and tachycardia are the most frequently cited physiological triggers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"1963-1973"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13674203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reasons and physiological triggers for blood transfusion in critically ill patients are not well characterized. Beyond hemoglobin levels, hemodynamic instability is frequently cited, but its role across clinical contexts remains unclear.

Aims: (1) To determine whether reasons and triggers for RBC transfusion differ across intensive care unit (ICU) days with varying transfusion intensity. (2) To describe reasons for non-RBC transfusions across these intensity groups.

Methods: This sub-study of the prospective International Point Prevalence Study of Intensive Care Unit Transfusion Practices (InPUT) classified ICU days by transfusion intensity: nonmajor (1 RBC unit), major (≥2 units), and massive (≥6 units in a single event, ≥10 per day, or Massive Transfusion Protocol activation). ICU days without transfusion for active bleeding were classified as no bleeding.

Results: Significant differences in the multivariate composition of reasons for RBC transfusion were observed across intensity groups on permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Hypotension was the most frequently cited physiological trigger in nonmajor (54%, n = 80/148) and major transfusions (68%, n = 196/288), but less frequent in massive transfusions (30%, n = 14/64). Tachycardia was the second most common trigger in nonmajor (37%, n = 80/148), major (40%, n = 116/288), and massive transfusions (22%, n = 19/64).

Conclusion: RBC transfusions are administered for distinct, intensity-dependent combinations of reasons and triggers. Transfusion intensity and clinical context are therefore key factors in evaluating transfusion practices. Among bleeding critically ill patients, hypotension and tachycardia are the most frequently cited physiological triggers.

ICU输血强度:原因和触发因素。
背景:危重患者输血的原因和生理触发因素尚不清楚。除了血红蛋白水平外,血流动力学不稳定性经常被引用,但其在临床环境中的作用尚不清楚。目的:(1)确定不同输血强度的重症监护病房(ICU)输血的原因和触发因素是否不同。(2)描述各强度组非红细胞输注的原因。方法:这项前瞻性国际重症监护病房输血实践点流行研究(InPUT)的子研究根据输血强度对ICU天数进行了分类:非主要(1个RBC单位)、主要(≥2个单位)和大量(单个事件≥6个单位,每天≥10个单位,或大量输血方案激活)。活动性出血未输血的ICU天数归为无出血。结果:在排列方差分析(PERMANOVA)中观察到不同强度组中RBC输血原因的多因素组成有显著差异。低血压是非重大输血(54%,n = 80/148)和重大输血(68%,n = 196/288)中最常见的生理触发因素,但在大量输血中较少见(30%,n = 14/64)。在非主要(37%,n = 80/148)、主要(40%,n = 116/288)和大量输血(22%,n = 19/64)中,心动过速是第二常见的触发因素。结论:红细胞输注是由于不同的、强度依赖的原因和触发因素。因此,输血强度和临床环境是评估输血做法的关键因素。在出血的危重病人中,低血压和心动过速是最常被引用的生理诱因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书