The Interactive Effects of Emotional Closeness, Positive Affect, and Perceived Positive Communication in Romantic Couples: A Daily Diary Study

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1002/jclp.70200
Ramya Ramadurai, Yiqing Fan, Ella S. Sudit, Kelly V. Klein, Nathaniel R. Herr, Kathleen C. Gunthert
{"title":"The Interactive Effects of Emotional Closeness, Positive Affect, and Perceived Positive Communication in Romantic Couples: A Daily Diary Study","authors":"Ramya Ramadurai,&nbsp;Yiqing Fan,&nbsp;Ella S. Sudit,&nbsp;Kelly V. Klein,&nbsp;Nathaniel R. Herr,&nbsp;Kathleen C. Gunthert","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Research has suggested that independently and in combination, positive affect, emotional closeness, and perceived positive communication behaviors, are important to relationship satisfaction for adults in romantic relationships. The current study leveraged daily diary data from 158 individuals in cohabitating romantic couples to better understand the isolated and interactive effects of an individual's daily positive affect, emotional closeness, and perceived positive communication behaviors (verbal and nonverbal) on their daily relationship satisfaction. We expected that higher scores on each daily predictor would be associated with higher daily relationship satisfaction. Informed by positivity resonance theory, we also expected that the effect of these predictors would enhance each other in pairs, regardless of inclusion of the third component. We found that each of these predictors was individually associated with higher daily relationship satisfaction. We also found significant interactions between daily emotional closeness and both daily perceived positive communication behaviors and daily positive affect, in association with daily relationship satisfaction. There was not a significant interaction between positive affect and perceived positive communication behaviors. Across analyses, we found a buffering effect such that when one construct was low, the other tended to protect against the negative association with relationship satisfaction. Daily emotional closeness consistently emerged as beneficial to daily relationship satisfaction. Findings suggest that, from an individual perspective, endorsement of these positive experiences over the course of the day is relevant to relationship satisfaction on the same day.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"82 11","pages":"1865-1873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has suggested that independently and in combination, positive affect, emotional closeness, and perceived positive communication behaviors, are important to relationship satisfaction for adults in romantic relationships. The current study leveraged daily diary data from 158 individuals in cohabitating romantic couples to better understand the isolated and interactive effects of an individual's daily positive affect, emotional closeness, and perceived positive communication behaviors (verbal and nonverbal) on their daily relationship satisfaction. We expected that higher scores on each daily predictor would be associated with higher daily relationship satisfaction. Informed by positivity resonance theory, we also expected that the effect of these predictors would enhance each other in pairs, regardless of inclusion of the third component. We found that each of these predictors was individually associated with higher daily relationship satisfaction. We also found significant interactions between daily emotional closeness and both daily perceived positive communication behaviors and daily positive affect, in association with daily relationship satisfaction. There was not a significant interaction between positive affect and perceived positive communication behaviors. Across analyses, we found a buffering effect such that when one construct was low, the other tended to protect against the negative association with relationship satisfaction. Daily emotional closeness consistently emerged as beneficial to daily relationship satisfaction. Findings suggest that, from an individual perspective, endorsement of these positive experiences over the course of the day is relevant to relationship satisfaction on the same day.

情感亲密度、积极情感和感知积极沟通的互动效应:一项日常日记研究。
研究表明,积极的影响、情感上的亲密和感知到的积极的沟通行为,无论是单独的还是结合在一起,都对恋爱中的成年人的关系满意度很重要。目前的研究利用了158对同居情侣的日常日记数据,以更好地理解个人日常积极影响、情感亲密和感知到的积极沟通行为(口头和非口头)对他们日常关系满意度的孤立和互动影响。我们预计,每项日常预测指标的得分越高,日常关系满意度越高。根据正性共振理论,我们还预计这些预测因子的影响将相互增强,无论是否包含第三个成分。我们发现,这些预测因素中的每一个都单独与较高的日常关系满意度相关。我们还发现,日常情感亲密度与日常感知的积极沟通行为和日常积极影响之间存在显著的相互作用,并与日常关系满意度相关。积极情绪与感知到的积极沟通行为之间没有显著的交互作用。通过分析,我们发现了一种缓冲效应,即当一个构念较低时,另一个构念倾向于防止与关系满意度的负相关。每天的情感亲密始终有利于每天的关系满意度。研究结果表明,从个人角度来看,在一天中对这些积极经历的认可与当天的关系满意度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书