Development of an Artificial Intelligence for Detecting False Positive Detection to Manage the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy.

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.23922/jarc.2025-112
Naohisa Yoshida, Ruiyao Zhang, Yasutaka Morimoto, Takeshi Yasuda, Reo Kobayashi, Naoto Iwai, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Hardesh Dhillon, Ryohei Hirose, Tomohisa Takagi, Xin Zhu
{"title":"Development of an Artificial Intelligence for Detecting False Positive Detection to Manage the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy.","authors":"Naohisa Yoshida, Ruiyao Zhang, Yasutaka Morimoto, Takeshi Yasuda, Reo Kobayashi, Naoto Iwai, Ken Inoue, Osamu Dohi, Hardesh Dhillon, Ryohei Hirose, Tomohisa Takagi, Xin Zhu","doi":"10.23922/jarc.2025-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>False positive detection (FPD) is a clinically relevant challenge that must be solved to ensure the safe and effective integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into colonoscopy. This study aimed to develop a novel AI system for quantifying FPD and to compare FPD rates between two commercially available AI platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2022 to May 2025, a total of 436,637 images were collected from 78 patient colonoscopy videos: 38 videos (340,121 images) using CAD EYE (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and 40 videos (96,516 images) using EndoBRAIN (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Using these images, YOLOv8 convolutional neural networks were applied to construct original AI model for FPD analysis: ARBS-YOLOv8 (with active learning). The performance of the model was validated using the CAD EYE and EndoBRAIN clinical videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For CAD EYE validation, ARBS-YOLOv8 achieved an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score of 99.22%, 99.51%, 99.97%, 99.96%, and 99.90%, respectively. For EndoBRAIN validation, the ARBS-YOLOv8 results were 99.97%, 99.84%, 99.97%, 99.97%, and 99.90%, respectively. The false-positive and false-negative rates of FPD detection were only 0.04% and 0.03% for CAD EYE and 0.03% and 0.03% for EndoBRAIN. In 13 collected clinical videos (7 CAD EYE, 6 EndoBRAIN), ARBS-YOLOv8 identified total FPD rates of 8.08% for CAD EYE and 2.47% for EndoBRAIN, showing a significant difference (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed the first AI system capable of objectively measuring FPD during colonoscopy under two commercially available AI platforms. The model validated performance differences between CAD EYE and EndoBRAIN, providing a basis for FPD reduction and safe AI endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":56349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","volume":"10 3","pages":"351-360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2025-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: False positive detection (FPD) is a clinically relevant challenge that must be solved to ensure the safe and effective integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into colonoscopy. This study aimed to develop a novel AI system for quantifying FPD and to compare FPD rates between two commercially available AI platforms.

Methods: From October 2022 to May 2025, a total of 436,637 images were collected from 78 patient colonoscopy videos: 38 videos (340,121 images) using CAD EYE (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and 40 videos (96,516 images) using EndoBRAIN (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Using these images, YOLOv8 convolutional neural networks were applied to construct original AI model for FPD analysis: ARBS-YOLOv8 (with active learning). The performance of the model was validated using the CAD EYE and EndoBRAIN clinical videos.

Results: For CAD EYE validation, ARBS-YOLOv8 achieved an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score of 99.22%, 99.51%, 99.97%, 99.96%, and 99.90%, respectively. For EndoBRAIN validation, the ARBS-YOLOv8 results were 99.97%, 99.84%, 99.97%, 99.97%, and 99.90%, respectively. The false-positive and false-negative rates of FPD detection were only 0.04% and 0.03% for CAD EYE and 0.03% and 0.03% for EndoBRAIN. In 13 collected clinical videos (7 CAD EYE, 6 EndoBRAIN), ARBS-YOLOv8 identified total FPD rates of 8.08% for CAD EYE and 2.47% for EndoBRAIN, showing a significant difference (p<0.001).

Conclusion: We developed the first AI system capable of objectively measuring FPD during colonoscopy under two commercially available AI platforms. The model validated performance differences between CAD EYE and EndoBRAIN, providing a basis for FPD reduction and safe AI endoscopy.

假阳性检测人工智能的发展管理人工智能在结肠镜检查中的准确性。
目的:假阳性检测(FPD)是确保人工智能(AI)安全有效地整合到结肠镜检查中必须解决的临床相关挑战。本研究旨在开发一种新的人工智能系统,用于量化FPD,并比较两种商用人工智能平台之间的FPD率。方法:从2022年10月至2025年5月,收集78例患者结肠镜检查视频共436,637张,其中CAD EYE(富士胶片,日本东京)视频38张(340,121张),EndoBRAIN(奥林巴斯,日本东京)视频40张(96,516张)。利用这些图像,应用YOLOv8卷积神经网络构建用于FPD分析的原始AI模型:ARBS-YOLOv8(主动学习)。使用CAD EYE和EndoBRAIN临床视频验证了模型的性能。结果:在CAD EYE验证中,ARBS-YOLOv8的准确性、灵敏度、特异性、精密度和F1评分分别为99.22%、99.51%、99.97%、99.96%和99.90%。对于EndoBRAIN验证,ARBS-YOLOv8的结果分别为99.97%、99.84%、99.97%、99.97%和99.90%。CAD EYE检测FPD的假阳性率和假阴性率分别为0.04%和0.03%,EndoBRAIN检测FPD的假阳性率和假阴性率分别为0.03%和0.03%。在收集的13个临床视频(7个CAD EYE, 6个EndoBRAIN)中,ARBS-YOLOv8识别出CAD EYE和EndoBRAIN的总FPD率分别为8.08%和2.47%,差异显著(p)结论:我们开发了第一个能够在两种商用AI平台下客观测量结肠镜检查过程中FPD的AI系统。该模型验证了CAD EYE和EndoBRAIN之间的性能差异,为FPD降低和安全的AI内镜检查提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书