A Unifying Guide for Action: A Practical Synthesis of National Academies Documents on Mis- and Disinformation (2020-2025).

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Howard Koh, Vish K Viswanath, Elena Savoia
{"title":"A Unifying Guide for Action: A Practical Synthesis of National Academies Documents on Mis- and Disinformation (2020-2025).","authors":"Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Josefina Nuñez Sahr, Howard Koh, Vish K Viswanath, Elena Savoia","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2026.2705365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid spread of mis/disinformation has become a threat to public health. In response, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) produced nine publications on this topic between 2020-2025. This study qualitatively analyzes and synthesizes these publications to examine how approaches to misinformation are articulated across levels and sectors. The most recent, a 2025 Consensus Study Report, served as a reference framework; its 13 formal recommendations guided deductive coding of proposed actions across the remaining publications, with inductive refinement of emergent themes. As a result, seven themes emerged: 1) community engagement, 2) tools and techniques to counter misinformation, 3) communication, 4) social media and online platforms, 5) collaboration, 6) journalism, and 7) other priorities. Across these themes, approaches are distributed, but unevenly developed, across individual, community, institutional, and technological levels, involving a wide range of actors. Taken together, these publications call for practical, audience-specific communication strategies grounded in trust-building efforts, with genuine community involvement. Future work should evaluate the effectiveness of proposed approaches while considering the evolving regulatory, political, and social context in which misinformation persists.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2026.2705365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid spread of mis/disinformation has become a threat to public health. In response, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) produced nine publications on this topic between 2020-2025. This study qualitatively analyzes and synthesizes these publications to examine how approaches to misinformation are articulated across levels and sectors. The most recent, a 2025 Consensus Study Report, served as a reference framework; its 13 formal recommendations guided deductive coding of proposed actions across the remaining publications, with inductive refinement of emergent themes. As a result, seven themes emerged: 1) community engagement, 2) tools and techniques to counter misinformation, 3) communication, 4) social media and online platforms, 5) collaboration, 6) journalism, and 7) other priorities. Across these themes, approaches are distributed, but unevenly developed, across individual, community, institutional, and technological levels, involving a wide range of actors. Taken together, these publications call for practical, audience-specific communication strategies grounded in trust-building efforts, with genuine community involvement. Future work should evaluate the effectiveness of proposed approaches while considering the evolving regulatory, political, and social context in which misinformation persists.

统一行动指南:国家科学院关于错误和虚假信息文件的实用综合(2020-2025)。
错误/虚假信息的迅速传播已对公众健康构成威胁。作为回应,美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院(NASEM)在2020-2025年期间就这一主题发表了九份出版物。本研究定性地分析和综合了这些出版物,以研究如何跨层次和部门阐述错误信息的方法。最近的《2025年共识研究报告》作为参考框架;它的13项正式建议指导了在其余出版物中对拟议行动的演绎编码,并对紧急主题进行归纳改进。因此,出现了七个主题:1)社区参与,2)打击错误信息的工具和技术,3)沟通,4)社交媒体和在线平台,5)合作,6)新闻,以及7)其他优先事项。在这些主题中,方法是分布的,但在个人、社区、机构和技术层面上发展不均匀,涉及范围广泛的行动者。综上所述,这些出版物要求在建立信任努力的基础上,在真正的社区参与下,制定切实可行的、针对具体受众的传播战略。未来的工作应评估所提出的方法的有效性,同时考虑到不断变化的监管、政治和社会背景,其中错误信息持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书