Ophthalmic needs of Indigenous adults experiencing homelessness and marginal housing: a serial cross-sectional analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shayaan Kaleem, Winnie Yu, Michael Balas, Shiva Acharya, Saige McMahon, Nicky Bomberry, Victoria Wylson-Sher, Myrna Lichter
{"title":"Ophthalmic needs of Indigenous adults experiencing homelessness and marginal housing: a serial cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Shayaan Kaleem, Winnie Yu, Michael Balas, Shiva Acharya, Saige McMahon, Nicky Bomberry, Victoria Wylson-Sher, Myrna Lichter","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the frequency and causes of visual impairment (VI) among Indigenous adults experiencing homelessness or marginal housing in Toronto and Hamilton, Ontario.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Serial cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Indigenous adults 18 years or older attending 5 ocular screening clinics at Indigenous-led shelters (September 2021 to October 2023) who had not received an eye examination in the previous 12 months and were not currently seeing an ophthalmologist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected sociodemographic data and medical history and performed presenting and pinhole visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, autorefraction, and anterior and posterior examination. VI was defined using the North American threshold (better-eye visual acuity <20/50). World Health Organization VI categories also were recorded. We report categorical variables as counts and percentages and continuous variables as means and SDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven participants were included. VI was present in 30.9% (n = 30) of participants on the basis of presenting acuity and 9.3% (n = 9) after pinhole. By World Health Organization categories, 25.8% (n = 25) had moderate impairment or blindness at presentation and 6.2% (n = 6) after pinhole. Most participants were dissatisfied with their vision (75.3%, n = 73), and 48.5% (n = 47) currently owned glasses, despite 73.2% (n = 71) having previously owned a pair. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to eye care (30.9%, n = 30). The mean time since last eye examination was 6.3 years (SD 6.5 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indigenous adults experiencing homelessness or marginal housing had a high burden of correctable VI and long intervals without care. Refractive services with on-site dispensing and facilitated follow-up may reduce vision loss in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.07.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the frequency and causes of visual impairment (VI) among Indigenous adults experiencing homelessness or marginal housing in Toronto and Hamilton, Ontario.

Design: Serial cross-sectional study.

Participants: Indigenous adults 18 years or older attending 5 ocular screening clinics at Indigenous-led shelters (September 2021 to October 2023) who had not received an eye examination in the previous 12 months and were not currently seeing an ophthalmologist.

Methods: We collected sociodemographic data and medical history and performed presenting and pinhole visual acuity, intraocular pressure measurement, autorefraction, and anterior and posterior examination. VI was defined using the North American threshold (better-eye visual acuity <20/50). World Health Organization VI categories also were recorded. We report categorical variables as counts and percentages and continuous variables as means and SDs.

Results: Ninety-seven participants were included. VI was present in 30.9% (n = 30) of participants on the basis of presenting acuity and 9.3% (n = 9) after pinhole. By World Health Organization categories, 25.8% (n = 25) had moderate impairment or blindness at presentation and 6.2% (n = 6) after pinhole. Most participants were dissatisfied with their vision (75.3%, n = 73), and 48.5% (n = 47) currently owned glasses, despite 73.2% (n = 71) having previously owned a pair. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to eye care (30.9%, n = 30). The mean time since last eye examination was 6.3 years (SD 6.5 years).

Conclusions: Indigenous adults experiencing homelessness or marginal housing had a high burden of correctable VI and long intervals without care. Refractive services with on-site dispensing and facilitated follow-up may reduce vision loss in this population.

经历无家可归和边缘住房的土著成年人的眼科需求:一个系列横断面分析。
目的:描述多伦多和安大略省汉密尔顿无家可归或边缘住房的土著成年人视力障碍(VI)的频率和原因。设计:连续横断面研究。参与者:在土著居民领导的庇护所(2021年9月至2023年10月)参加5个眼科筛查诊所的18岁或以上的土著成年人,他们在过去12个月内没有接受过眼科检查,目前也没有去看眼科医生。方法:收集社会人口统计资料和病史,并进行视力、针孔视力、眼压测量、自体屈光和前后检查。VI定义使用北美阈值(更好的眼睛视力)结果:包括97名参与者。在呈现视力的基础上,有30.9% (n = 30)的参与者存在VI,针孔后有9.3% (n = 9)的参与者存在VI。按照世界卫生组织的分类,25.8% (n = 25)的患者出现中度损伤或失明,6.2% (n = 6)的患者出现针孔后失明。大多数参与者对自己的视力不满意(75.3%,n = 73),48.5% (n = 47)目前拥有眼镜,尽管73.2% (n = 71)以前拥有一副眼镜。费用是最常见的眼保健障碍(30.9%,n = 30)。距上次眼科检查平均时间6.3年(SD 6.5年)。结论:经历无家可归或边缘住房的土著成年人具有高可矫正的VI负担和长间隔的无护理。屈光服务与现场配药和便利的随访可以减少这一人群的视力丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
223
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书