Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence from Nine European Countries.

IF 3.7 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Comparative Political Studies Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1177/00104140251369317
Sven Hegewald, Dominik Schraff
{"title":"Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence from Nine European Countries.","authors":"Sven Hegewald, Dominik Schraff","doi":"10.1177/00104140251369317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies in the United States and Europe have documented a growing divergence in voting behaviour and political attitudes between cities and the countryside. However, we still lack systematic evidence on the extent to which this urban-rural divide is also affectively polarised. To shed light on this, we advance the concept of place-based affective polarisation, which we define as the difference between in-group and out-group affect in relation to place-based groups. Drawing on original survey data from nine European countries, we show that place-based affective polarisation is substantial along the urban-rural divide and associated with strong feelings of place-based resentment and identity. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of place-based affective polarisation correlate with support for GAL parties (green, alternative, libertarian) among urbanites and support for TAN parties (traditional, authoritarian, nationalist) among ruralites. Overall, our findings point to a strong political cleavage between urban and rural areas in several European countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":10600,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Studies","volume":"59 10","pages":"2159-2200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251369317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies in the United States and Europe have documented a growing divergence in voting behaviour and political attitudes between cities and the countryside. However, we still lack systematic evidence on the extent to which this urban-rural divide is also affectively polarised. To shed light on this, we advance the concept of place-based affective polarisation, which we define as the difference between in-group and out-group affect in relation to place-based groups. Drawing on original survey data from nine European countries, we show that place-based affective polarisation is substantial along the urban-rural divide and associated with strong feelings of place-based resentment and identity. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of place-based affective polarisation correlate with support for GAL parties (green, alternative, libertarian) among urbanites and support for TAN parties (traditional, authoritarian, nationalist) among ruralites. Overall, our findings point to a strong political cleavage between urban and rural areas in several European countries.

城乡分化是否存在情感极化?来自九个欧洲国家的比较证据。
最近在美国和欧洲进行的研究表明,城市和农村在投票行为和政治态度上的差异越来越大。然而,我们仍然缺乏系统的证据,证明这种城乡差距在多大程度上也在情感上两极分化。为了阐明这一点,我们提出了基于地点的情感两极分化的概念,我们将其定义为与基于地点的群体相关的群体内和群体外情感之间的差异。根据来自9个欧洲国家的原始调查数据,我们表明,基于地方的情感两极分化在城乡鸿沟中是实质性的,并与强烈的基于地方的怨恨和认同感有关。此外,我们发现更高水平的基于地点的情感两极分化与城市居民对GAL政党(绿色、替代、自由主义)的支持和农村居民对TAN政党(传统、威权、民族主义)的支持相关。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在几个欧洲国家,城市和农村地区之间存在着强烈的政治分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Political Studies
Comparative Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Comparative Political Studies is a journal of social and political science which publishes scholarly work on comparative politics at both the cross-national and intra-national levels. We are particularly interested in articles which have an innovative theoretical argument and are based on sound and original empirical research. We also encourage submissions about comparative methodology, particularly when methodological arguments are closely linked with substantive issues in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书