Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s12328-026-02414-0
Katsuya Ami, Keiko Kamei, Masaya Nakano, Chihoko Nobori, Yuta Yoshida, Kentaro Tai, Takaaki Murase, Atsushi Takebe, Ippei Matsumoto
{"title":"Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.","authors":"Katsuya Ami, Keiko Kamei, Masaya Nakano, Chihoko Nobori, Yuta Yoshida, Kentaro Tai, Takaaki Murase, Atsushi Takebe, Ippei Matsumoto","doi":"10.1007/s12328-026-02414-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) is an established and minimally invasive treatment option for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, its application in the postoperative setting after pancreatic resection has rarely been described. We report a case of extensive infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy that was successfully managed using a step-up approach incorporating VARD. An 81-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail. On postoperative day (POD) 7, she developed sudden-onset abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated enlargement of the remnant pancreas with increased peripancreatic fat stranding. Follow-up CT on POD 9 and 12 revealed progressive enlargement of the fluid collection around the pancreatic stump with rapid extension of inflammatory changes into the retroperitoneal space. Conservative management with fasting and antibiotic therapy resulted in temporary improvement in inflammatory markers. However, extensive infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis developed on POD 38. On POD 43, CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage failed to achieve adequate source control due to highly viscous necrotic debris, necessitating surgical necrosectomy. An additional drainage tube was placed to establish a retroperitoneal access route, after which VARD was performed on POD 55, with removal of 61 g of necrotic fatty tissue. Inflammatory markers rapidly improved, and the patient was discharged in good condition on POD 102. Infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was successfully managed using a step-up strategy incorporating VARD. This case highlights VARD as a minimally invasive therapeutic option for postoperative infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10364,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1292-1299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-026-02414-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) is an established and minimally invasive treatment option for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. However, its application in the postoperative setting after pancreatic resection has rarely been described. We report a case of extensive infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy that was successfully managed using a step-up approach incorporating VARD. An 81-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail. On postoperative day (POD) 7, she developed sudden-onset abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated enlargement of the remnant pancreas with increased peripancreatic fat stranding. Follow-up CT on POD 9 and 12 revealed progressive enlargement of the fluid collection around the pancreatic stump with rapid extension of inflammatory changes into the retroperitoneal space. Conservative management with fasting and antibiotic therapy resulted in temporary improvement in inflammatory markers. However, extensive infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis developed on POD 38. On POD 43, CT-guided percutaneous catheter drainage failed to achieve adequate source control due to highly viscous necrotic debris, necessitating surgical necrosectomy. An additional drainage tube was placed to establish a retroperitoneal access route, after which VARD was performed on POD 55, with removal of 61 g of necrotic fatty tissue. Inflammatory markers rapidly improved, and the patient was discharged in good condition on POD 102. Infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was successfully managed using a step-up strategy incorporating VARD. This case highlights VARD as a minimally invasive therapeutic option for postoperative infected retroperitoneal fat necrosis.

视频辅助腹膜后清创治疗腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后感染腹膜后脂肪坏死。
视频辅助腹膜后清创(VARD)是一种成熟的微创治疗感染性坏死性胰腺炎的选择。然而,它在胰腺切除术后的术后环境中的应用很少被描述。我们报告一例广泛感染腹膜后脂肪坏死后腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术,成功地管理使用升级入路合并VARD。一例81岁女性因胰尾导管腺癌行腹腔镜胰远端切除术。术后第7天,患者出现突发性腹痛。计算机断层扫描(CT)显示残余胰腺增大,胰腺周围脂肪搁浅增加。随访CT POD 9和12显示胰腺残端周围积液逐渐增大,炎症变化迅速扩展到腹膜后间隙。禁食和抗生素治疗的保守管理导致炎症标志物的暂时改善。然而,POD 38出现了广泛的感染腹膜后脂肪坏死。在POD 43中,由于高粘稠的坏死碎片,ct引导下的经皮导管引流未能达到足够的源头控制,需要手术切除坏死。放置额外的引流管以建立腹膜后通路,之后对POD 55进行VARD,去除61 g坏死脂肪组织。炎症指标迅速改善,患者在POD 102时出院,病情良好。腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术后感染腹膜后脂肪坏死的成功管理使用升级策略合并VARD。本病例强调VARD作为术后感染腹膜后脂肪坏死的微创治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: The journal publishes Case Reports and Clinical Reviews on all aspects of the digestive tract, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Critical Case Reports that show originality or have educational implications for diagnosis and treatment are especially encouraged for submission. Personal reviews of clinical gastroenterology are also welcomed. The journal aims for quick publication of such critical Case Reports and Clinical Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书