Relationship between Voxel Value of Cone Beam CT and Hounsfield Unit of CT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Q3 Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-01-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v23i5.20888
Daryush Goodarzipour, Ahmad Reza Shamshiri, Zahra Khodadadi
{"title":"Relationship between Voxel Value of Cone Beam CT and Hounsfield Unit of CT: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Daryush Goodarzipour, Ahmad Reza Shamshiri, Zahra Khodadadi","doi":"10.18502/fid.v23i5.20888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aims to investigate the relationship between voxel value obtained from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in studies compared to Hounsfield of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. A literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science searching for relevant literature until February 2022 (updated at July 2023). A risk of bias assessment of the studies was performed using a modified checklist based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Journal of Biomedical Informatics. The software version 20.104 of MedCalc was used to conduct the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Out of 4750 articles in the initial search, 13 met the eligibility criteria. Out of the articles, eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Both heterogeneous and homogenous samples showed a strong correlation between the voxel value of CBCT and Hounsfield Unit (HU), with high heterogeneity (r=0.900 and 0.998 respectively and I2>70%). Two other meta-analyses were conducted for kVp and voxel size, which showed a high correlation. The 95% confidence interval was used to present the estimated pooled correlation. The strong correlation of voxel value and HU indicates the possible potential of CBCT in radiographic bone density measurement. However, further research is needed to obtain an accurate conversion equation for translating voxel values of CBCT to HU. Calibration of voxel values within each scan using a reference object and consideration of both linear and non-linear regression could improve accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"23 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13428513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v23i5.20888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review aims to investigate the relationship between voxel value obtained from Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in studies compared to Hounsfield of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. A literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science searching for relevant literature until February 2022 (updated at July 2023). A risk of bias assessment of the studies was performed using a modified checklist based on the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Journal of Biomedical Informatics. The software version 20.104 of MedCalc was used to conduct the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients. Out of 4750 articles in the initial search, 13 met the eligibility criteria. Out of the articles, eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Both heterogeneous and homogenous samples showed a strong correlation between the voxel value of CBCT and Hounsfield Unit (HU), with high heterogeneity (r=0.900 and 0.998 respectively and I2>70%). Two other meta-analyses were conducted for kVp and voxel size, which showed a high correlation. The 95% confidence interval was used to present the estimated pooled correlation. The strong correlation of voxel value and HU indicates the possible potential of CBCT in radiographic bone density measurement. However, further research is needed to obtain an accurate conversion equation for translating voxel values of CBCT to HU. Calibration of voxel values within each scan using a reference object and consideration of both linear and non-linear regression could improve accuracy.

锥形束CT体素值与CT Hounsfield单元的关系:系统综述与meta分析。
本系统综述旨在探讨锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)与多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)在均匀和非均匀样本中获得的体素值之间的关系。在PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science数据库中检索相关文献,检索截止到2022年2月(更新至2023年7月)。使用基于Cochrane协作工具和《生物医学信息学杂志》的修改清单对研究进行偏倚风险评估。采用MedCalc 20.104软件对相关系数进行meta分析。在最初搜索的4750篇文章中,有13篇符合资格标准。在这些文章中,有8项研究被纳入了荟萃分析。非均质和均质样品的CBCT体素值与Hounsfield Unit (HU)均表现出较强的相关性,且异质性较高(r分别为0.900和0.998,I2>70%)。对kVp和体素大小进行了另外两项meta分析,显示出高度相关。95%置信区间用于表示估计的合并相关性。体素值与HU的强相关性表明CBCT在x线骨密度测量中的可能潜力。然而,CBCT体素值到HU的精确转换方程还有待进一步研究。使用参考对象校准每次扫描中的体素值并考虑线性和非线性回归可以提高精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书