Physiological and Subjective Assessment of Fighter Pilot Mental Workload.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Anna J C Reuten, Juliette Bruin, Wietse D Ledegang, Eric L Groen, Mark M J Houben, Erik-Jan Cornelisse, Charelle Bottenheft
{"title":"Physiological and Subjective Assessment of Fighter Pilot Mental Workload.","authors":"Anna J C Reuten, Juliette Bruin, Wietse D Ledegang, Eric L Groen, Mark M J Houben, Erik-Jan Cornelisse, Charelle Bottenheft","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6875.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Next-generation air force operations increasingly depend on advanced flight systems, which raises questions about their impact on aircrew workload. Physiological measures enable continuous, objective, and unobtrusive assessments, overcoming some limitations of self-report measures. We investigated whether electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and electrodermal activity predicted subjective Rating Scale of Mental Effort (RSME) ratings of fighter pilots during an operationally relevant mission in an F-16 simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The mission included three flight segments expected to induce increasingly higher workload, with a mathematical task of two arithmetic difficulty levels added to each segment. This approach allowed us to explore whether physiology distinguished workload both across and within flight segments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjective ratings confirmed an increase in workload throughout the mission (ΔRSME = 22). However, our manipulation of arithmetic difficulty was less effective: neither subjective ratings nor arithmetic performance significantly differentiated simple and complex calculations (ΔRSME = 5; Δreaction time = 0.02 s, Δunsuccessful trials = 0.5). None of our physiological measures-frontal theta power (Δ0.08, Δ-0.07 mV), parietal alpha power (Δ-0.16, Δ0.14 mV), heart rate (Δ0.01, Δ-0.02 bpm), skin conductance response (Δ0.0, Δ0.0 mS), and skin conductance peaks (Δ0.3, Δ0.2)-systematically distinguished flight segments or arithmetic difficulty, respectively. Physiology also did not significantly predict subjective workload (R2 = 2.2%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Large interindividual variability, use of workload management strategies, and relatively small task demand differences may explain the null results. Our study underscores the complexity of workload assessment in an operational setting and offers methodological insights that may inform future ecologically valid research. Reuten AJC, Bruin J, Ledegang WD, Groen EL, Houben MMJ, Cornelisse E-J, Bottenheft C. Physiological and subjective assessment of fighter pilot mental workload. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(8):592-600.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"97 8","pages":"592-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6875.2026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Next-generation air force operations increasingly depend on advanced flight systems, which raises questions about their impact on aircrew workload. Physiological measures enable continuous, objective, and unobtrusive assessments, overcoming some limitations of self-report measures. We investigated whether electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and electrodermal activity predicted subjective Rating Scale of Mental Effort (RSME) ratings of fighter pilots during an operationally relevant mission in an F-16 simulator.

Methods: The mission included three flight segments expected to induce increasingly higher workload, with a mathematical task of two arithmetic difficulty levels added to each segment. This approach allowed us to explore whether physiology distinguished workload both across and within flight segments.

Results: Subjective ratings confirmed an increase in workload throughout the mission (ΔRSME = 22). However, our manipulation of arithmetic difficulty was less effective: neither subjective ratings nor arithmetic performance significantly differentiated simple and complex calculations (ΔRSME = 5; Δreaction time = 0.02 s, Δunsuccessful trials = 0.5). None of our physiological measures-frontal theta power (Δ0.08, Δ-0.07 mV), parietal alpha power (Δ-0.16, Δ0.14 mV), heart rate (Δ0.01, Δ-0.02 bpm), skin conductance response (Δ0.0, Δ0.0 mS), and skin conductance peaks (Δ0.3, Δ0.2)-systematically distinguished flight segments or arithmetic difficulty, respectively. Physiology also did not significantly predict subjective workload (R2 = 2.2%).

Discussion: Large interindividual variability, use of workload management strategies, and relatively small task demand differences may explain the null results. Our study underscores the complexity of workload assessment in an operational setting and offers methodological insights that may inform future ecologically valid research. Reuten AJC, Bruin J, Ledegang WD, Groen EL, Houben MMJ, Cornelisse E-J, Bottenheft C. Physiological and subjective assessment of fighter pilot mental workload. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(8):592-600.

战斗机飞行员心理负荷的生理与主观评价。
下一代空军作战越来越依赖于先进的飞行系统,这就提出了它们对机组人员工作量影响的问题。生理测量能够实现持续、客观和不引人注目的评估,克服了自我报告测量的一些局限性。我们在F-16模拟器中研究了脑电图、心电图和皮肤电活动是否能预测战斗机飞行员在作战相关任务中的主观心理努力评定量表(RSME)评分。方法:该任务包括三个航段,预计会导致越来越高的工作量,每个航段增加了两个算术难度级别的数学任务。这种方法使我们能够探索生理学是否在飞行段之间和飞行段内区分工作量。结果:主观评分证实整个特派团的工作量增加(ΔRSME = 22)。然而,我们对算术难度的操纵效果较差:主观评分和算术表现都不能显著区分简单和复杂的计算(ΔRSME = 5; Δreaction时间= 0.02 s, Δunsuccessful试验数= 0.5)。没有我们的生理measures-frontalθ(Δ0.08Δ-0.07 mV),顶叶α权力(Δ-0.16Δ0.14 mV),心率(Δ0.01Δ-0.02 bpm),皮肤电导响应(Δ0.0Δ0.0 mS),和皮肤电导峰(Δ0.3Δ0.2)系统的杰出飞行段或算术难题,分别。生理学也不能显著预测主观工作量(R2 = 2.2%)。讨论:较大的个体间可变性、工作负载管理策略的使用以及相对较小的任务需求差异可以解释无效结果。我们的研究强调了在操作环境中工作量评估的复杂性,并提供了可能为未来生态有效研究提供信息的方法见解。刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,等。战斗机飞行员心理负荷的生理与主观评价。航空航天Med Hum执行。2026;97(8): 592 - 600。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书