Effects of tai chi on balance function among stroke patients: a meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Archives of Medical Science Pub Date : 2026-06-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5114/aoms/218491
Xiaohui Qin, Meilin Jiang, Haiqun Lin, Caixia Hu, Jinke Huang
{"title":"Effects of tai chi on balance function among stroke patients: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaohui Qin, Meilin Jiang, Haiqun Lin, Caixia Hu, Jinke Huang","doi":"10.5114/aoms/218491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Impaired balance is a common and debilitating sequela among stroke survivors. Tai chi (TC), a traditional mind-body exercise, has emerged as a promising rehabilitative intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effects of TC on balance function in post-stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and Wanfang Data) from their inception until May 13, 2025, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies compared TC (as an adjunct or standalone therapy) with conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) in stroke patients, using balance-related outcomes as endpoints. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Statistical synthesis was performed using RevMan software (version 5.4).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty RCTs involving 1296 participants were included. The pooled results demonstrated that, compared to CRT alone, the integration of TC with CRT led to significantly greater improvements across multiple balance measures: the Berg Balance Scale (mean difference [MD] = 6.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.19 to 7.15), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (MD = 7.18, 95% CI: 4.14 to 10.23), the Timed Up-and-Go test (MD = -2.03, 95% CI: -3.65 to -0.41), the Functional Reach Test (MD = 2.81, 95% CI: 0.29 to 5.33), the Modified Fall Efficacy Scale (MD = 8.70, 95% CI: 4.36 to 13.04), and the Fall Risk Index (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests a beneficial effect of integrating TC with CRT for improving balance after stroke. However, due to methodological limitations and the overall quality of the included trials, these findings should be interpreted with caution. More rigorous and well-designed studies are needed before definitive clinical recommendations can be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":8278,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science","volume":"22 3","pages":"1618-1626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/218491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Impaired balance is a common and debilitating sequela among stroke survivors. Tai chi (TC), a traditional mind-body exercise, has emerged as a promising rehabilitative intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively evaluate the effects of TC on balance function in post-stroke patients.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and Wanfang Data) from their inception until May 13, 2025, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies compared TC (as an adjunct or standalone therapy) with conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) in stroke patients, using balance-related outcomes as endpoints. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Statistical synthesis was performed using RevMan software (version 5.4).

Results: Twenty RCTs involving 1296 participants were included. The pooled results demonstrated that, compared to CRT alone, the integration of TC with CRT led to significantly greater improvements across multiple balance measures: the Berg Balance Scale (mean difference [MD] = 6.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.19 to 7.15), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (MD = 7.18, 95% CI: 4.14 to 10.23), the Timed Up-and-Go test (MD = -2.03, 95% CI: -3.65 to -0.41), the Functional Reach Test (MD = 2.81, 95% CI: 0.29 to 5.33), the Modified Fall Efficacy Scale (MD = 8.70, 95% CI: 4.36 to 13.04), and the Fall Risk Index (MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.34).

Conclusions: Current evidence suggests a beneficial effect of integrating TC with CRT for improving balance after stroke. However, due to methodological limitations and the overall quality of the included trials, these findings should be interpreted with caution. More rigorous and well-designed studies are needed before definitive clinical recommendations can be established.

太极拳对脑卒中患者平衡功能的影响:荟萃分析。
简介:平衡障碍是中风幸存者中常见的、使人衰弱的后遗症。太极拳(TC),一种传统的身心锻炼,已经成为一种有前途的康复干预。本荟萃分析旨在定量评估TC对脑卒中后患者平衡功能的影响。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、CNKI、SinoMed、VIP、万方数据等8个电子数据库自建立至2025年5月13日的相关文献,筛选相关随机对照试验(RCTs)。符合条件的研究比较了TC(作为辅助或独立治疗)与常规康复治疗(CRT)在中风患者中的应用,以平衡相关的结果作为终点。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。采用RevMan软件(版本5.4)进行统计综合。结果:共纳入20项随机对照试验,共1296名受试者。综合结果表明,与单独CRT相比,TC与CRT的整合在多个平衡测量方面有显著更大的改善:Berg平衡量表(平均差值[MD] = 6.17, 95%可信区间[CI]: 5.19至7.15),Fugl-Meyer评估量表(MD = 7.18, 95% CI: 4.14至10.23),Timed Up-and-Go测试(MD = -2.03, 95% CI: -3.65至-0.41),功能到达测试(MD = 2.81, 95% CI:0.29至5.33),改良跌倒效能量表(MD = 8.70, 95% CI: 4.36至13.04)和跌倒风险指数(MD = -0.78, 95% CI: -1.22至-0.34)。结论:目前的证据表明,整合TC和CRT对改善卒中后的平衡有有益的作用。然而,由于方法学的局限性和纳入试验的总体质量,这些发现应谨慎解释。在确定明确的临床建议之前,需要更严格和精心设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Medical Science
Archives of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
139
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Medical Science (AMS) publishes high quality original articles and reviews of recognized scientists that deal with all scientific medicine. AMS opens the possibilities for young, capable scientists. The journal would like to give them a chance to have a publication following matter-of-fact, professional review by outstanding, famous medical scientists. Thanks to that they will have an opportunity to present their study results and/or receive useful advice about the mistakes they have made so far. The second equally important aim is a presentation of review manuscripts of recognized scientists about the educational capacity, in order that young scientists, often at the beginning of their scientific carrier, could constantly deepen their medical knowledge and be up-to-date with current guidelines and trends in world-wide medicine. The fact that our educational articles are written by world-famous scientists determines their innovation and the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书