Durga Datta Chapagain, Vasuki Rajaguru, Do Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Whiejong M Han
{"title":"Healthcare Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Expenditure Among Adults With and Without Cancer in Korea-Analysis of the Korea Health Panel Survey.","authors":"Durga Datta Chapagain, Vasuki Rajaguru, Do Hee Kim, Tae Hyun Kim, Whiejong M Han","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer imposes substantial clinical and financial burdens worldwide. Although Korea operates a universal National Health Insurance system, concerns remain regarding healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs among cancer patients. This study compared healthcare utilization and OOP expenditure between adults with and without cancer in Korea and quantified adjusted differences associated with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the 2023 Korea Health Panel Survey and included adults aged ≥ 19 years. Healthcare utilization outcomes included outpatient visits, hospitalizations, emergency visits, total health encounters. OOP expenditures included inpatient, outpatient, emergency, pharmacy, and total annual healthcare expenditure. Survey-weighted Poisson or negative binomial regression models and generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link were used to estimate adjusted differences in healthcare utilization and OOP expenditures associated with cancer status after controlling for sociodemographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, insurance-related, and clinical covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10,911 participants, 626 (5.7%) reported a history of cancer and 10,285 (94.3%) had no history of cancer. Mean annual healthcare utilization was significantly higher among participants with cancer than those without cancer including hospitalization (0.78 vs. 0.19), outpatient visits (32.93 vs. 18.59), emergency visits (0.20 vs. 0.11), and total utilization (33.91 vs. 18.89) Cancer was independently associated with an adjusted difference of 8.93 total visits, 0.49 hospitalizations, 8.36 outpatient visits, and 0.08 emergency visits annually (all p < 0.001). OOP expenditure was substantially higher among cancer patients ($1,828 vs. $676; p < 0.001), with significant adjusted differences in total OOP expenditure ($917), inpatient ($639), outpatient ($224), and pharmacy ($53). Lung ($2453), cervical ($1341), colorectal ($1113), and other cancers ($1201) showed the highest expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cancer is associated with markedly greater healthcare utilization and significant OOP expenditure burden despite Korea's National Health Insurance (NHI) coverage. Strengthening financial protection, expanding coverage for high-cost care, reinforcing OOP caps, and supporting vulnerable households are essential. Future longitudinal studies incorporating cancer stages, treatment pathways, and indirect costs are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.70142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cancer imposes substantial clinical and financial burdens worldwide. Although Korea operates a universal National Health Insurance system, concerns remain regarding healthcare utilization and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs among cancer patients. This study compared healthcare utilization and OOP expenditure between adults with and without cancer in Korea and quantified adjusted differences associated with cancer.
Methods: Data were obtained from the 2023 Korea Health Panel Survey and included adults aged ≥ 19 years. Healthcare utilization outcomes included outpatient visits, hospitalizations, emergency visits, total health encounters. OOP expenditures included inpatient, outpatient, emergency, pharmacy, and total annual healthcare expenditure. Survey-weighted Poisson or negative binomial regression models and generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log link were used to estimate adjusted differences in healthcare utilization and OOP expenditures associated with cancer status after controlling for sociodemographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, insurance-related, and clinical covariates.
Results: Among 10,911 participants, 626 (5.7%) reported a history of cancer and 10,285 (94.3%) had no history of cancer. Mean annual healthcare utilization was significantly higher among participants with cancer than those without cancer including hospitalization (0.78 vs. 0.19), outpatient visits (32.93 vs. 18.59), emergency visits (0.20 vs. 0.11), and total utilization (33.91 vs. 18.89) Cancer was independently associated with an adjusted difference of 8.93 total visits, 0.49 hospitalizations, 8.36 outpatient visits, and 0.08 emergency visits annually (all p < 0.001). OOP expenditure was substantially higher among cancer patients ($1,828 vs. $676; p < 0.001), with significant adjusted differences in total OOP expenditure ($917), inpatient ($639), outpatient ($224), and pharmacy ($53). Lung ($2453), cervical ($1341), colorectal ($1113), and other cancers ($1201) showed the highest expenditure.
Conclusion: Cancer is associated with markedly greater healthcare utilization and significant OOP expenditure burden despite Korea's National Health Insurance (NHI) coverage. Strengthening financial protection, expanding coverage for high-cost care, reinforcing OOP caps, and supporting vulnerable households are essential. Future longitudinal studies incorporating cancer stages, treatment pathways, and indirect costs are warranted.
背景:癌症在世界范围内造成了巨大的临床和经济负担。虽然韩国实行全民健康保险制度,但人们仍然担心癌症患者的医疗保健利用和自付费用。本研究比较了韩国患有和未患癌症的成年人的医疗保健利用和OOP支出,并量化了与癌症相关的调整差异。方法:数据来自2023年韩国健康小组调查,包括年龄≥19岁的成年人。医疗保健利用结果包括门诊次数、住院次数、急诊次数和总健康接触次数。面向对象的支出包括住院、门诊、急诊、药房和年度医疗保健总支出。在控制了社会人口学、社会经济、行为、保险相关和临床协变量后,使用调查加权泊松或负二项回归模型和具有伽马分布和对数联系的广义线性模型来估计与癌症状况相关的医疗保健利用和OOP支出的调整差异。结果:在10911名参与者中,626名(5.7%)报告了癌症病史,10285名(94.3%)没有癌症病史。癌症患者的平均年医疗保健利用率显著高于非癌症患者,包括住院(0.78 vs. 0.19)、门诊(32.93 vs. 18.59)、急诊(0.20 vs. 0.11)和总利用率(33.91 vs. 18.89)。癌症独立相关的调整差异为每年总就诊8.93次、住院0.49次、门诊8.36次和急诊0.08次(均p)。尽管韩国的国民健康保险(NHI)覆盖范围,但癌症与明显更高的医疗保健利用和显著的OOP支出负担相关。加强财务保护、扩大高成本医疗服务的覆盖范围、加强OOP上限以及支持弱势家庭至关重要。未来的纵向研究将纳入癌症分期、治疗途径和间接费用。
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.