Cognitive screening for cardiovascular risk stratification in stable coronary artery disease: a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Archives of Medical Science Pub Date : 2026-05-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5114/aoms/219383
Zehao Zhao, Yaodong Ding, Yong Zeng
{"title":"Cognitive screening for cardiovascular risk stratification in stable coronary artery disease: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Zehao Zhao, Yaodong Ding, Yong Zeng","doi":"10.5114/aoms/219383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While cognitive impairment is prevalent in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), its prognostic significance in stable CAD patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study of 6,130 stable CAD patients, baseline cognitive function was assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Unplanned revascularization was specified as a secondary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the prognostic impact of cognitive impairment. The robustness of the findings was tested via subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 549 days, 123 (2.0%) patients experienced a MACE, and 315 (5.1%) underwent unplanned revascularization. Patients in the MACE group had significantly lower baseline cognitive function. Worse cognitive function was observed in older adults, females, individuals with lower educational attainment, and those with cardiometabolic risk factors. Patients with cognitive impairment had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of unplanned revascularization (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.791). After multivariable adjustment, cognitive impairment remained an independent predictor of MACE (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.06-2.37, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of primary findings. In subgroup analyses, cognitive impairment showed a consistent trend toward increased MACE risk across all strata, with the notable exception of the subgroup with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 1.8 mmol/l.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline cognitive impairment is an independent predictor of MACE in stable CAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8278,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science","volume":"22 3","pages":"1359-1371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/219383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While cognitive impairment is prevalent in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), its prognostic significance in stable CAD patients remains unclear.

Material and methods: In this prospective cohort study of 6,130 stable CAD patients, baseline cognitive function was assessed using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. Unplanned revascularization was specified as a secondary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the prognostic impact of cognitive impairment. The robustness of the findings was tested via subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 549 days, 123 (2.0%) patients experienced a MACE, and 315 (5.1%) underwent unplanned revascularization. Patients in the MACE group had significantly lower baseline cognitive function. Worse cognitive function was observed in older adults, females, individuals with lower educational attainment, and those with cardiometabolic risk factors. Patients with cognitive impairment had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (log-rank p = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of unplanned revascularization (log-rank p = 0.791). After multivariable adjustment, cognitive impairment remained an independent predictor of MACE (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.06-2.37, p = 0.026). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of primary findings. In subgroup analyses, cognitive impairment showed a consistent trend toward increased MACE risk across all strata, with the notable exception of the subgroup with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 1.8 mmol/l.

Conclusions: Baseline cognitive impairment is an independent predictor of MACE in stable CAD patients.

稳定性冠状动脉疾病心血管危险分层的认知筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究
导语:认知障碍在冠心病(CAD)患者中普遍存在,但其在稳定型冠心病患者中的预后意义尚不清楚。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,6130名稳定的CAD患者使用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评估基线认知功能。主要结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非致死性卒中。意外血运重建被指定为次要结果。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox回归评估认知障碍对预后的影响。研究结果的稳健性通过亚组分析和敏感性分析进行检验。结果:在中位549天的随访中,123例(2.0%)患者经历了MACE, 315例(5.1%)患者经历了计划外血运重建术。MACE组患者的基线认知功能显著降低。老年人、女性、受教育程度较低的个体和有心脏代谢危险因素的个体认知功能较差。认知障碍患者的MACE发生率显著较高(log-rank p = 0.001)。相比之下,计划外血运重建术的发生率无显著差异(log-rank p = 0.791)。多变量调整后,认知障碍仍然是MACE的独立预测因子(HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.06-2.37, p = 0.026)。敏感性分析证实了主要发现的稳健性。在亚组分析中,除了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇< 1.8 mmol/l的亚组外,认知障碍在所有阶层中都显示出一致的MACE风险增加趋势。结论:基线认知障碍是稳定型CAD患者MACE的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Medical Science
Archives of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
139
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Medical Science (AMS) publishes high quality original articles and reviews of recognized scientists that deal with all scientific medicine. AMS opens the possibilities for young, capable scientists. The journal would like to give them a chance to have a publication following matter-of-fact, professional review by outstanding, famous medical scientists. Thanks to that they will have an opportunity to present their study results and/or receive useful advice about the mistakes they have made so far. The second equally important aim is a presentation of review manuscripts of recognized scientists about the educational capacity, in order that young scientists, often at the beginning of their scientific carrier, could constantly deepen their medical knowledge and be up-to-date with current guidelines and trends in world-wide medicine. The fact that our educational articles are written by world-famous scientists determines their innovation and the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书