Use of ChatGPT among Student Nurses in Baguio City, Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2026-06-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.11158
Carl Austin T Lacanlale, Cherylina G Dalilis, Breanna Stefanie S Gayagay, Sarah May D Da-O, Tiziana M Bilog, Francesca Anne D Bacsa, Dominique Anne P Lauzon, Abigail Mariano, Shevawn T Rabara, Ron Andrei A Reyes, Jessica Loren M Torio
{"title":"Use of ChatGPT among Student Nurses in Baguio City, Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Carl Austin T Lacanlale, Cherylina G Dalilis, Breanna Stefanie S Gayagay, Sarah May D Da-O, Tiziana M Bilog, Francesca Anne D Bacsa, Dominique Anne P Lauzon, Abigail Mariano, Shevawn T Rabara, Ron Andrei A Reyes, Jessica Loren M Torio","doi":"10.47895/amp.vi0.11158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>ChatGPT, an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) platform developed by OpenAI, is increasingly used in nursing education and practice. However, limited studies have explored its use among student nurses and how factors such as sex and year level affect its adoption. Addressing this gap is essential to ensure the responsible integration of AI and preserve nursing competencies, such as critical thinking and problem-solving. This study aimed to determine the extent of ChatGPT use among student nurses, including differences between sexes and year level, as well as the factors that facilitate or hinder its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quantitative descriptive study involved student nurses from Saint Louis University, Baguio City, selected through proportionate random sampling in February 2024. Participants were aged 18 years or older, enrolled in the 2023-2024 academic year, and had prior experience using ChatGPT. The researchers administered a 30-item self-developed questionnaire, which demonstrated strong content validity (CVI = 0.92) and reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.85). Researchers used weighted mean to measure the extent of ChatGPT use, two-sample t-tests, and ANOVA to evaluate significant differences by sex and year level, and frequency and percentage to identify the most common factors that facilitate and hinder its use. All analyses were conducted using Jamovi version 2.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Student nurses (N = 300) reported a slightly extensive use of ChatGPT (x̄w = 2.40), with quick response time (x̄ = 2.85) and concise summarization of key concepts (x̄ = 2.85) as the main reasons for use. There were no significant differences in use between sexes (<i>p</i> = 0.761) or year levels (<i>p =</i> 0.062). The most frequently reported facilitating factors were ease of use (66.67%) and ability to generate useful answers (50.33%), while the main hindrances were long user queues (45.33%) and lack of references (45%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adoption of ChatGPT among student nurses is driven by its ease of use, perceived usefulness, and quality of responses, as reflected in participants' moderate to slightly extensive use for summarizing concepts, generating ideas, and obtaining explanations. In light of these findings, nursing programs should incorporate ChatGPT as a supportive learning resource while guiding its responsible use. Future research should ensure balanced gender representation, consider demographic factors such as age and technological proficiency, and explore ChatGPT's applications across disciplines using qualitative or mixed-methods approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":"60 11","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.11158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: ChatGPT, an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) platform developed by OpenAI, is increasingly used in nursing education and practice. However, limited studies have explored its use among student nurses and how factors such as sex and year level affect its adoption. Addressing this gap is essential to ensure the responsible integration of AI and preserve nursing competencies, such as critical thinking and problem-solving. This study aimed to determine the extent of ChatGPT use among student nurses, including differences between sexes and year level, as well as the factors that facilitate or hinder its use.

Methods: This quantitative descriptive study involved student nurses from Saint Louis University, Baguio City, selected through proportionate random sampling in February 2024. Participants were aged 18 years or older, enrolled in the 2023-2024 academic year, and had prior experience using ChatGPT. The researchers administered a 30-item self-developed questionnaire, which demonstrated strong content validity (CVI = 0.92) and reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.85). Researchers used weighted mean to measure the extent of ChatGPT use, two-sample t-tests, and ANOVA to evaluate significant differences by sex and year level, and frequency and percentage to identify the most common factors that facilitate and hinder its use. All analyses were conducted using Jamovi version 2.4.

Results: Student nurses (N = 300) reported a slightly extensive use of ChatGPT (x̄w = 2.40), with quick response time (x̄ = 2.85) and concise summarization of key concepts (x̄ = 2.85) as the main reasons for use. There were no significant differences in use between sexes (p = 0.761) or year levels (p = 0.062). The most frequently reported facilitating factors were ease of use (66.67%) and ability to generate useful answers (50.33%), while the main hindrances were long user queues (45.33%) and lack of references (45%).

Conclusion: The adoption of ChatGPT among student nurses is driven by its ease of use, perceived usefulness, and quality of responses, as reflected in participants' moderate to slightly extensive use for summarizing concepts, generating ideas, and obtaining explanations. In light of these findings, nursing programs should incorporate ChatGPT as a supportive learning resource while guiding its responsible use. Future research should ensure balanced gender representation, consider demographic factors such as age and technological proficiency, and explore ChatGPT's applications across disciplines using qualitative or mixed-methods approaches.

菲律宾碧瑶市学生护士ChatGPT的使用:一项横断面研究。
背景与目的:ChatGPT是OpenAI公司开发的先进人工智能(AI)平台,越来越多地应用于护理教育和实践。然而,有限的研究探讨了其在学生护士中的使用,以及性别和年龄等因素如何影响其采用。解决这一差距对于确保人工智能的负责任地整合和保持护理能力(如批判性思维和解决问题的能力)至关重要。本研究旨在确定学生护士使用ChatGPT的程度,包括性别和年级之间的差异,以及促进或阻碍其使用的因素。方法:采用比例随机抽样的方法,对2024年2月在碧瑶市圣路易斯大学就读的护生进行定量描述性研究。参与者年龄在18岁或以上,在2023-2024学年入学,并且有使用ChatGPT的经验。问卷共30项,具有较强的内容效度(CVI = 0.92)和信度(Cronbach’s α = 0.85)。研究人员使用加权平均值来衡量ChatGPT的使用程度,使用双样本t检验和方差分析来评估性别和年份水平的显著差异,使用频率和百分比来确定促进和阻碍其使用的最常见因素。所有分析均使用Jamovi 2.4版本进行。结果:学生护士(N = 300)使用ChatGPT的比例略高(x ā w = 2.40),使用ChatGPT的主要原因是反应时间快(x ā w = 2.85)和对关键概念的简明概括(x ā w = 2.85)。性别(p = 0.761)和年份(p = 0.062)之间的使用没有显著差异。最常见的促进因素是易用性(66.67%)和生成有用答案的能力(50.33%),而主要障碍是用户排队时间长(45.33%)和缺乏参考资料(45%)。结论:在护生中采用ChatGPT是由其易用性、感知有用性和响应质量驱动的,这反映在参与者在总结概念、产生想法和获得解释方面适度到略微广泛地使用。鉴于这些发现,护理项目应将ChatGPT作为一种支持性学习资源,同时指导其负责任的使用。未来的研究应确保平衡的性别代表性,考虑人口统计学因素,如年龄和技术熟练程度,并使用定性或混合方法探索ChatGPT的跨学科应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书