Genetically inferred effects of brain structure and gene expression on neurodegenerative diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Archives of Medical Science Pub Date : 2026-06-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5114/aoms/219499
Sen Wang, Yiqun Lin, Yujie Che, Jiahang Zhao, Linyu Xu, Wen He, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Genetically inferred effects of brain structure and gene expression on neurodegenerative diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.","authors":"Sen Wang, Yiqun Lin, Yujie Che, Jiahang Zhao, Linyu Xu, Wen He, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.5114/aoms/219499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Against the backdrop of accelerating population aging, the risk of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) has risen significantly. While brain structure plays a critical role in NDDs, the interplay between them remains unclear. This study employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate potential causal relationships between brain structure, region-specific gene expression, and four NDDs - Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and multiple sclerosis (MS) - providing new directions and genetically informed hypotheses for disease research.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>MR analyses were conducted using inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and Wald ratio methods. Summary-data-based MR (SMR) was applied to identify brain genes influencing NDDs. We calculated F-statistics, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), odds ratios, and <i>p</i>-values. Sensitivity analyses included the heterogeneity <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> statistic, Cochran's Q test, Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 512 unsupervised deep-learning imaging phenotypes (UDIPs) were analyzed. Thirty-four UDIPs showed associations consistent with a potential causal role in AD, 56 in PD, 22 in ALS, and 92 in MS. After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, 4 remained significant for AD and PD, 3 for ALS, and 28 for MS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Brain regions (excluding the cervical spinal cord C-1) exhibited shared causal genetic features across all four NDDs, primarily involving HLA-class genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides genetic evidence suggestive of potential causal associations between UDIPs, brain gene expression, and NDDs. These findings offer genetically predicted evidence that may generate hypotheses and inform future mechanistic research into NDD pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8278,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science","volume":"22 3","pages":"1663-1677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13426151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/219499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Against the backdrop of accelerating population aging, the risk of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) has risen significantly. While brain structure plays a critical role in NDDs, the interplay between them remains unclear. This study employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate potential causal relationships between brain structure, region-specific gene expression, and four NDDs - Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and multiple sclerosis (MS) - providing new directions and genetically informed hypotheses for disease research.

Material and methods: MR analyses were conducted using inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and Wald ratio methods. Summary-data-based MR (SMR) was applied to identify brain genes influencing NDDs. We calculated F-statistics, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), odds ratios, and p-values. Sensitivity analyses included the heterogeneity I2 statistic, Cochran's Q test, Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out validation.

Results: Data from 512 unsupervised deep-learning imaging phenotypes (UDIPs) were analyzed. Thirty-four UDIPs showed associations consistent with a potential causal role in AD, 56 in PD, 22 in ALS, and 92 in MS. After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, 4 remained significant for AD and PD, 3 for ALS, and 28 for MS (p < 0.05). Brain regions (excluding the cervical spinal cord C-1) exhibited shared causal genetic features across all four NDDs, primarily involving HLA-class genes.

Conclusions: This study provides genetic evidence suggestive of potential causal associations between UDIPs, brain gene expression, and NDDs. These findings offer genetically predicted evidence that may generate hypotheses and inform future mechanistic research into NDD pathogenesis.

基因推断脑结构和基因表达对神经退行性疾病的影响:一项孟德尔随机研究。
导读:在人口老龄化加速的背景下,神经退行性疾病(ndd)的风险显著上升。虽然大脑结构在ndd中起着关键作用,但它们之间的相互作用尚不清楚。本研究采用孟德尔随机化(MR)方法研究大脑结构、区域特异性基因表达与四种ndd(阿尔茨海默病(AD)、帕金森病(PD)、肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)和多发性硬化症(MS)之间的潜在因果关系,为疾病研究提供新的方向和遗传学假设。材料和方法:采用反方差加权(IVW)、MR- egger、加权中位数、加权模式和Wald比值法进行磁共振分析。采用基于汇总数据的MR (SMR)技术鉴定影响ndd的脑基因。我们计算了f统计量、95%置信区间(ci)、优势比和p值。敏感性分析包括异质性I2统计量、Cochran’s Q检验、Egger截距检验、MR-PRESSO和留一验证。结果:分析了512个无监督深度学习成像表型(UDIPs)的数据。34个udip与AD、56个与PD、22个与ALS和92个与MS的潜在因果关系一致。在错误发现率(FDR)校正后,AD和PD仍有4个存在显著性关联,ALS有3个,MS有28个(p < 0.05)。大脑区域(不包括颈脊髓C-1)在所有四种ndd中表现出共同的因果遗传特征,主要涉及hla类基因。结论:本研究提供了提示udip、脑基因表达和ndd之间潜在因果关系的遗传证据。这些发现提供了基因预测的证据,可能产生假设,并为未来NDD发病机制的机制研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Medical Science
Archives of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
139
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Medical Science (AMS) publishes high quality original articles and reviews of recognized scientists that deal with all scientific medicine. AMS opens the possibilities for young, capable scientists. The journal would like to give them a chance to have a publication following matter-of-fact, professional review by outstanding, famous medical scientists. Thanks to that they will have an opportunity to present their study results and/or receive useful advice about the mistakes they have made so far. The second equally important aim is a presentation of review manuscripts of recognized scientists about the educational capacity, in order that young scientists, often at the beginning of their scientific carrier, could constantly deepen their medical knowledge and be up-to-date with current guidelines and trends in world-wide medicine. The fact that our educational articles are written by world-famous scientists determines their innovation and the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书