Erin E Flynn-Evans, Nicholas Bathurst, Sean Pradhan, Kevin B Gregory, Laura K Barger, Amanda C M Lamp, Zachary Glaros, Lucia Arsintescu, Rachel A Jansen, Hannah M Baumgartner, Thomas E Nesthus, Cassie J Hilditch
{"title":"Characterizing Pilot Fatigue During Circadian-Disrupted Short-Haul Aviation Operations.","authors":"Erin E Flynn-Evans, Nicholas Bathurst, Sean Pradhan, Kevin B Gregory, Laura K Barger, Amanda C M Lamp, Zachary Glaros, Lucia Arsintescu, Rachel A Jansen, Hannah M Baumgartner, Thomas E Nesthus, Cassie J Hilditch","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6898.2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Short-haul aviation pilots often operate irregular schedules that encroach on the biological night and disrupt sleep, alertness, fatigue, and cognitive performance, posing a potential safety risk. Regulatory limits and industry practices exist to mitigate such impairments, but few studies have examined the impact of circadian-disrupted schedules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Commercial passenger pilots from four U.S. airlines collected data during, and 1-3 d before and after, two trip types: one with circadian disruption (i.e., ≥1 duty day encroaching on the biological night); and one without. Sleep was measured using actigraphy and sleep logs. Subjects completed a 5-min psychomotor vigilance task, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, and Samn-Perelli fatigue scale 3x/day on days off and after waking, pre-duty, at top-of-descent for each flight, post-duty, and before bed on duty days. We compared outcomes with mixed-effects models adjusted for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects (N = 159) provided valid data for analysis. We found small but significant differences (all d values <0.30) between circadian-disrupted and nondisrupted trips, with greater sleepiness (4.77 ± 2.16 vs. 4.43 ± 2.11), greater fatigue (3.64 ± 1.38 vs. 3.37 ± 1.34), slower response speed (1000/reaction time; 3.86 ± 0.63 vs. 3.94 ± 0.61), and less total daily sleep time (6.28 ± 1.73 h vs. 6.75 ± 1.28 h) during the circadian-disrupted trips.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that there is a small but significant reduction in alertness and performance when working during the biological night that remains, even when prescriptive limitations and existing airline mitigations are in place. Flynn-Evans EE, Bathurst N, Pradhan S, Gregory KB, Barger LK, Lamp ACM, Glaros Z, Arsintescu L, Jansen RA, Baumgartner HM, Nesthus TE, Hilditch CJ. Characterizing pilot fatigue during circadian-disrupted short-haul aviation operations. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(8):607-617.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"97 8","pages":"607-617"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6898.2026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Short-haul aviation pilots often operate irregular schedules that encroach on the biological night and disrupt sleep, alertness, fatigue, and cognitive performance, posing a potential safety risk. Regulatory limits and industry practices exist to mitigate such impairments, but few studies have examined the impact of circadian-disrupted schedules.
Methods: Commercial passenger pilots from four U.S. airlines collected data during, and 1-3 d before and after, two trip types: one with circadian disruption (i.e., ≥1 duty day encroaching on the biological night); and one without. Sleep was measured using actigraphy and sleep logs. Subjects completed a 5-min psychomotor vigilance task, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, and Samn-Perelli fatigue scale 3x/day on days off and after waking, pre-duty, at top-of-descent for each flight, post-duty, and before bed on duty days. We compared outcomes with mixed-effects models adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Results: Subjects (N = 159) provided valid data for analysis. We found small but significant differences (all d values <0.30) between circadian-disrupted and nondisrupted trips, with greater sleepiness (4.77 ± 2.16 vs. 4.43 ± 2.11), greater fatigue (3.64 ± 1.38 vs. 3.37 ± 1.34), slower response speed (1000/reaction time; 3.86 ± 0.63 vs. 3.94 ± 0.61), and less total daily sleep time (6.28 ± 1.73 h vs. 6.75 ± 1.28 h) during the circadian-disrupted trips.
Discussion: Our findings suggest that there is a small but significant reduction in alertness and performance when working during the biological night that remains, even when prescriptive limitations and existing airline mitigations are in place. Flynn-Evans EE, Bathurst N, Pradhan S, Gregory KB, Barger LK, Lamp ACM, Glaros Z, Arsintescu L, Jansen RA, Baumgartner HM, Nesthus TE, Hilditch CJ. Characterizing pilot fatigue during circadian-disrupted short-haul aviation operations. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2026; 97(8):607-617.
期刊介绍:
The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.