An Exploration of the Inter-Sectional Identity of Black Female Leaders in the UK: A Shotterian Study

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Gender Work and Organization Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-05 DOI:10.1111/gwao.70131
Rita G. Klapper, Paul J. Upham, Sven Kuenzel
{"title":"An Exploration of the Inter-Sectional Identity of Black Female Leaders in the UK: A Shotterian Study","authors":"Rita G. Klapper,&nbsp;Paul J. Upham,&nbsp;Sven Kuenzel","doi":"10.1111/gwao.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the experience of Black female leaders in UK business and the narratives of their lived experience of marginalization. Drawing principally on the rather small UK-focused literature on this topic as context, as well as some of the much larger international literature, methodologically we use the approach to qualitative inquiry developed by John Shotter. Shotter argued strongly for understanding human experience from the inside, in a social constructivist form of phenomenological investigation that views “data gathering” in such contexts as a dialog between the researcher and the subject. The main research question is: <i>How do Black female leaders in the UK understand and experience the barriers and challenges of being marginalised in contemporary business</i>? One of our main contributions of this research is the methodological shift: by advocating for Shotter's “withness/withinness” thinking, we encourage a shift away from objectifying marginalized subjects as research objects, towards co-created meaning-making. In addition, we contribute to academic discourse by proposing new insights that both reaffirm and challenge existing paradigms relating to, for example, the nuanced distinction between “glass” and “concrete ceilings” in conventional feminist leadership discourse. The data analysis identified three key themes relating to the intersectional identity of black female leaders, two of which represent the <i>internal dimensions</i> of the intersectional identity of these black leaders: (a) “The Perception of Difference” and (b) “the Perception of Self.” The <i>structural dimension</i> of intersectional identity focuses on the “individual–organization relationship”. Both internal and structural dimensions are part and parcel of intersectional identity of black female leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"33 5","pages":"1692-1706"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.70131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.70131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the experience of Black female leaders in UK business and the narratives of their lived experience of marginalization. Drawing principally on the rather small UK-focused literature on this topic as context, as well as some of the much larger international literature, methodologically we use the approach to qualitative inquiry developed by John Shotter. Shotter argued strongly for understanding human experience from the inside, in a social constructivist form of phenomenological investigation that views “data gathering” in such contexts as a dialog between the researcher and the subject. The main research question is: How do Black female leaders in the UK understand and experience the barriers and challenges of being marginalised in contemporary business? One of our main contributions of this research is the methodological shift: by advocating for Shotter's “withness/withinness” thinking, we encourage a shift away from objectifying marginalized subjects as research objects, towards co-created meaning-making. In addition, we contribute to academic discourse by proposing new insights that both reaffirm and challenge existing paradigms relating to, for example, the nuanced distinction between “glass” and “concrete ceilings” in conventional feminist leadership discourse. The data analysis identified three key themes relating to the intersectional identity of black female leaders, two of which represent the internal dimensions of the intersectional identity of these black leaders: (a) “The Perception of Difference” and (b) “the Perception of Self.” The structural dimension of intersectional identity focuses on the “individual–organization relationship”. Both internal and structural dimensions are part and parcel of intersectional identity of black female leaders.

Abstract Image

英国黑人女性领袖的跨部门身份探索:一项短期研究
本研究调查了英国商界黑人女性领导者的经历,以及她们被边缘化的生活经历。主要以英国的小文献为背景,以及一些更大的国际文献,在方法上,我们使用约翰·肖特(John Shotter)开发的定性调查方法。肖特强烈主张从内部理解人类经验,在现象学研究的社会建构主义形式中,将这种背景下的“数据收集”视为研究人员与主体之间的对话。主要研究问题是:英国黑人女性领导者如何理解和体验在当代商业中被边缘化的障碍和挑战?我们对这项研究的主要贡献之一是方法论的转变:通过倡导肖特的“见证/内在”思维,我们鼓励将边缘化的主体作为研究对象客观化,转向共同创造的意义创造。此外,我们通过提出新的见解来促进学术话语,这些见解重申并挑战了现有的范式,例如,传统女权主义领导话语中“玻璃”和“混凝土天花板”之间的细微区别。数据分析确定了与黑人女性领导者交叉身份相关的三个关键主题,其中两个主题代表了这些黑人领导者交叉身份的内部维度:(a)“差异感知”和(b)“自我感知”。交叉认同的结构维度集中在“个人-组织关系”上。内部和结构两个维度都是黑人女性领导者交叉身份的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书