Whose Time Counts? A Commentary on Temporal Injustice and Crip Time

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Gender Work and Organization Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-26 DOI:10.1111/gwao.70174
Shumaila Yousafzai
{"title":"Whose Time Counts? A Commentary on Temporal Injustice and Crip Time","authors":"Shumaila Yousafzai","doi":"10.1111/gwao.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Time comes a wooing for each of us long before we encounter the vocabulary to name what it does. Chronos, in Greek mythology, devours his children, a reminder that time is not a neutral backdrop but a force that disciplines and decides what survives. Contemporary organizations institutionalize their own version of Chronos through promotion clocks, responsiveness norms, and performance cycles that reward speed, continuity, and linear progression. Yet time is unequally distributed. Women and girls perform approximately 16 billion hours of unpaid care work each day globally, and the gender gap in unpaid work is projected to persist for decades. Institutional clocks are designed for uninterrupted bodies and uninterrupted careers, while many lives are structured by care, disability, bureaucratic sequencing, and fluctuating capacity. This commentary advances temporal injustice as an inequality regime through which tempo, continuity, and responsiveness are converted into merit. Drawing on crip theory, the commentary positions crip time as an analytic lens that exposes how ableist temporal expectations are embedded in standards of productivity, legitimacy, and merit. The temporal injustice, crip time, and gender nexus is developed through four dimensions: chrononormativity and temporal structuring; gendered care and the privatization of temporal costs; bureaucratic time and organizational checkpoints; and embodied accumulation and temporal cartographies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"33 5","pages":"1613-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.70174","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gwao.70174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time comes a wooing for each of us long before we encounter the vocabulary to name what it does. Chronos, in Greek mythology, devours his children, a reminder that time is not a neutral backdrop but a force that disciplines and decides what survives. Contemporary organizations institutionalize their own version of Chronos through promotion clocks, responsiveness norms, and performance cycles that reward speed, continuity, and linear progression. Yet time is unequally distributed. Women and girls perform approximately 16 billion hours of unpaid care work each day globally, and the gender gap in unpaid work is projected to persist for decades. Institutional clocks are designed for uninterrupted bodies and uninterrupted careers, while many lives are structured by care, disability, bureaucratic sequencing, and fluctuating capacity. This commentary advances temporal injustice as an inequality regime through which tempo, continuity, and responsiveness are converted into merit. Drawing on crip theory, the commentary positions crip time as an analytic lens that exposes how ableist temporal expectations are embedded in standards of productivity, legitimacy, and merit. The temporal injustice, crip time, and gender nexus is developed through four dimensions: chrononormativity and temporal structuring; gendered care and the privatization of temporal costs; bureaucratic time and organizational checkpoints; and embodied accumulation and temporal cartographies.

谁的时间最重要?时间的不公平与时间的不公平
早在我们还没有找到能够描述时间作用的词汇之前,时间就向我们每个人求爱了。希腊神话中的克罗诺斯吞噬了他的孩子,提醒人们时间不是一个中立的背景,而是一种纪律和决定生存的力量。当代组织通过晋升时钟、响应规范和奖励速度、连续性和线性进展的绩效周期,将自己版本的Chronos制度化。然而,时间分配不均。全球妇女和女童每天从事约160亿小时的无偿护理工作,预计无偿工作中的性别差距将持续数十年。机构时钟是为不间断的身体和不间断的职业而设计的,而许多人的生活是由护理、残疾、官僚程序和波动的能力构成的。这篇评论将时间的不公正视为一种不平等制度,通过这种制度,节奏、连续性和反应性被转化为优点。利用蹩脚理论,这篇评论将蹩脚时间定位为一个分析镜头,揭示了能力主义的时间期望是如何嵌入到生产力、合法性和价值标准中的。时间不公正、时间缺陷和性别联系通过四个维度来发展:时间规范性和时间结构;两性护理和暂时费用私有化;官僚时间和组织检查点;体现了积累和时间制图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书