Implementation of quantitative HBsAg testing in clinical microbiology laboratories in Spain: Results from a national GEHEP-SEIMC survey

Lucía Chaves-Blanco, Marta Illescas-López, Ana Fuentes, Raquel Carracedo, Alberto Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto Vázquez Blanquiño, Ana María Blázquez, Ruth Sáez, Ana Miqueleiz, María de los Reyes Vidal, Tomás Tosco, César Gómez, Luz Moldes, Noelia Calvo, Lucía Pérez Rodríguez, Matilde Trigo, María Dolores Ocete, María Jesús Alcaraz, María Asunción Iborra, Julio García, Federico García
{"title":"Implementation of quantitative HBsAg testing in clinical microbiology laboratories in Spain: Results from a national GEHEP-SEIMC survey","authors":"Lucía Chaves-Blanco,&nbsp;Marta Illescas-López,&nbsp;Ana Fuentes,&nbsp;Raquel Carracedo,&nbsp;Alberto Delgado-Iribarren,&nbsp;Alberto Vázquez Blanquiño,&nbsp;Ana María Blázquez,&nbsp;Ruth Sáez,&nbsp;Ana Miqueleiz,&nbsp;María de los Reyes Vidal,&nbsp;Tomás Tosco,&nbsp;César Gómez,&nbsp;Luz Moldes,&nbsp;Noelia Calvo,&nbsp;Lucía Pérez Rodríguez,&nbsp;Matilde Trigo,&nbsp;María Dolores Ocete,&nbsp;María Jesús Alcaraz,&nbsp;María Asunción Iborra,&nbsp;Julio García,&nbsp;Federico García","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2026.503215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) is increasingly recognized as a key biomarker for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) management. This study aimed to assess the adoption, practices, and barriers to qHBsAg testing in Spanish clinical microbiology laboratories.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey was distributed through the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) Viral Hepatitis Study Group (GEHEP). Clinical microbiology laboratory professionals across Spain were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. The survey collected information on qHBsAg implementation, technical practices, barriers, and patient-related data. Descriptive statistics were applied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 118 laboratories invited, 91 responded (77.1%); only 37.4% performed qHBsAg. Among non-performing centers, 86% did not refer samples, mainly due to perceived low clinical demand (57.1%), plus lack of equipment/resources. Implementation correlated with hospital size (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.041): 0% (&lt;200 beds), 23.3% (200–500), 44.9% (500–1000), 62.5% (≥1000). Among performing labs, 57.6% quantified after a positive qualitative test, 27.3% on request, and 15.2% as initial screening. Proactive reporting was 69.7%, and 81.8% diluted samples above limits. In the last year, 40.7% of results were &lt;100<!--> <!-->IU/mL and 27.1% &gt;3000<!--> <!-->IU/mL; over five years (≈14,500 tests), 29.5% &gt;3000<!--> <!-->IU/mL and 27.3% &lt;100<!--> <!-->IU/mL, supporting the clinical relevance of these thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>qHBsAg testing is not uniformly implemented across Spanish clinical microbiology laboratories and workflows and reporting practices are heterogeneous. Given the descriptive design and potential selection bias, these results should be interpreted as a baseline assessment to inform harmonization efforts and future evaluations linking testing availability to clinical decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"44 7","pages":"Article 503215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529993X26001218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) is increasingly recognized as a key biomarker for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) management. This study aimed to assess the adoption, practices, and barriers to qHBsAg testing in Spanish clinical microbiology laboratories.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was distributed through the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) Viral Hepatitis Study Group (GEHEP). Clinical microbiology laboratory professionals across Spain were invited to complete an anonymous online questionnaire. The survey collected information on qHBsAg implementation, technical practices, barriers, and patient-related data. Descriptive statistics were applied.

Results

Of 118 laboratories invited, 91 responded (77.1%); only 37.4% performed qHBsAg. Among non-performing centers, 86% did not refer samples, mainly due to perceived low clinical demand (57.1%), plus lack of equipment/resources. Implementation correlated with hospital size (p = 0.041): 0% (<200 beds), 23.3% (200–500), 44.9% (500–1000), 62.5% (≥1000). Among performing labs, 57.6% quantified after a positive qualitative test, 27.3% on request, and 15.2% as initial screening. Proactive reporting was 69.7%, and 81.8% diluted samples above limits. In the last year, 40.7% of results were <100 IU/mL and 27.1% >3000 IU/mL; over five years (≈14,500 tests), 29.5% >3000 IU/mL and 27.3% <100 IU/mL, supporting the clinical relevance of these thresholds.

Conclusions

qHBsAg testing is not uniformly implemented across Spanish clinical microbiology laboratories and workflows and reporting practices are heterogeneous. Given the descriptive design and potential selection bias, these results should be interpreted as a baseline assessment to inform harmonization efforts and future evaluations linking testing availability to clinical decision-making.
西班牙临床微生物实验室HBsAg定量检测的实施:来自全国GEHEP-SEIMC调查的结果
定量乙型肝炎表面抗原(qHBsAg)越来越被认为是慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)治疗的关键生物标志物。本研究旨在评估西班牙临床微生物实验室qHBsAg检测的采用、实践和障碍。方法通过西班牙传染病与临床微生物学会(SEIMC)病毒性肝炎研究组(GEHEP)进行横断面调查。西班牙的临床微生物实验室专业人员被邀请完成一份匿名在线问卷。该调查收集了有关qHBsAg实施、技术实践、障碍和患者相关数据的信息。采用描述性统计。结果118家受邀实验室中,91家回复(77.1%);qHBsAg阳性率仅37.4%。在不良中心中,86%没有参考样本,主要是由于临床需求低(57.1%),加上缺乏设备/资源。实施与医院规模相关(p = 0.041): 0%(200张床位)、23.3%(200 - 500张)、44.9%(500-1000张)、62.5%(≥1000张)。在执行实验室中,57.6%在定性试验阳性后进行定量,27.3%应要求进行定量,15.2%为初始筛选。主动报告率为69.7%,81.8%的稀释样品超过限量。去年,40.7%的结果为100 IU/mL, 27.1%为3000 IU/mL;超过5年(≈14500次试验),29.5% >;3000 IU/mL和27.3% <100 IU/mL,支持这些阈值的临床相关性。结论:西班牙临床微生物实验室并未统一实施hbsag检测,工作流程和报告实践存在差异。考虑到描述性设计和潜在的选择偏差,这些结果应被解释为基线评估,以告知协调工作和将测试可用性与临床决策联系起来的未来评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书