Interfacial knotting and winding reinforcement for joining homogeneous and heterogeneous 3D continuous fiber lattices

IF 7.8 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Composite Structures Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120677
Jun Young Choi, Subin Yi, Seonghun Hyeon, Sung-Hoon Ahn
{"title":"Interfacial knotting and winding reinforcement for joining homogeneous and heterogeneous 3D continuous fiber lattices","authors":"Jun Young Choi,&nbsp;Subin Yi,&nbsp;Seonghun Hyeon,&nbsp;Sung-Hoon Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruct.2026.120677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reliable joining of independently fabricated continuous-fiber lattice units remains a critical challenge in architected composites because thin struts, porous topology, and non-planar interfaces limit effective load transfer and promote interface-dominated failure. Here, a permanent lattice-to-lattice joining strategy is developed by combining wet rebonding with mechanically reinforced fiber bridging using two architectures: localized knotting and distributed winding. Knotting introduces discrete anchoring across selected strut-level regions, whereas winding provides circumferential confinement over an extended joined interface. Mechanical evaluation under compression, monotonic tensile loading, cyclic tensile loading, and four-point bending shows that reinforced joints can retain or exceed the mass-normalized mechanical response of corresponding single-piece references, depending on reinforcement architecture and loading mode. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)–CFRP joints provide high stiffness and mass-normalized load-bearing performance, whereas CFRP–aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) joints introduce greater compliance and energy dissipation. Material-level impact tests on single-piece CFRP and AFRP lattices are reported separately as supplementary context. These results identify interfacial reinforcement architecture as a key design parameter for permanent assembly of continuous-fiber lattice structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":281,"journal":{"name":"Composite Structures","volume":"394 ","pages":"Article 120677"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composite Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822326006422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable joining of independently fabricated continuous-fiber lattice units remains a critical challenge in architected composites because thin struts, porous topology, and non-planar interfaces limit effective load transfer and promote interface-dominated failure. Here, a permanent lattice-to-lattice joining strategy is developed by combining wet rebonding with mechanically reinforced fiber bridging using two architectures: localized knotting and distributed winding. Knotting introduces discrete anchoring across selected strut-level regions, whereas winding provides circumferential confinement over an extended joined interface. Mechanical evaluation under compression, monotonic tensile loading, cyclic tensile loading, and four-point bending shows that reinforced joints can retain or exceed the mass-normalized mechanical response of corresponding single-piece references, depending on reinforcement architecture and loading mode. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)–CFRP joints provide high stiffness and mass-normalized load-bearing performance, whereas CFRP–aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) joints introduce greater compliance and energy dissipation. Material-level impact tests on single-piece CFRP and AFRP lattices are reported separately as supplementary context. These results identify interfacial reinforcement architecture as a key design parameter for permanent assembly of continuous-fiber lattice structures.

Abstract Image

连接均匀和非均匀三维连续纤维晶格的界面打结和缠绕增强
独立制造的连续纤维晶格单元的可靠连接仍然是结构复合材料的关键挑战,因为薄支撑、多孔拓扑和非平面界面限制了有效的载荷传递,并导致界面主导失效。在这里,通过使用两种结构:局部打结和分布式缠绕,将湿重粘与机械增强纤维桥接相结合,开发了一种永久的晶格到晶格连接策略。打结在选定的支柱级区域引入离散锚固,而缠绕在扩展的连接界面上提供周向约束。受压、单调拉伸荷载、循环拉伸荷载和四点弯曲荷载下的力学评价表明,不同的配筋结构和加载方式,配筋节点可以保持或超过相应的单件参考的质量归一化力学响应。碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP) -碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)接头具有高刚度和质量标准化的承载性能,而碳纤维增强聚合物-芳纶纤维增强聚合物(AFRP)接头具有更大的柔度和耗能。材料水平的冲击试验对单片CFRP和AFRP格分别报告作为补充背景。这些结果表明界面增强结构是连续纤维晶格结构永久装配的关键设计参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composite Structures
Composite Structures 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
1246
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The past few decades have seen outstanding advances in the use of composite materials in structural applications. There can be little doubt that, within engineering circles, composites have revolutionised traditional design concepts and made possible an unparalleled range of new and exciting possibilities as viable materials for construction. Composite Structures, an International Journal, disseminates knowledge between users, manufacturers, designers and researchers involved in structures or structural components manufactured using composite materials. The journal publishes papers which contribute to knowledge in the use of composite materials in engineering structures. Papers deal with design, research and development studies, experimental investigations, theoretical analysis and fabrication techniques relevant to the application of composites in load-bearing components for assemblies, ranging from individual components such as plates and shells to complete composite structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书