Inverse calibration of a thermal model for Directed Energy Deposition from thermocouple and infrared thermography data

IF 5.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Additive manufacturing letters Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100407
Markus Schewe, Hamed Dardaei Joghan, Yannis P. Korkolis, Andreas Menzel
{"title":"Inverse calibration of a thermal model for Directed Energy Deposition from thermocouple and infrared thermography data","authors":"Markus Schewe,&nbsp;Hamed Dardaei Joghan,&nbsp;Yannis P. Korkolis,&nbsp;Andreas Menzel","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal modelling of metal Directed Energy Deposition (DED) relies on the calibration of parameters that are not directly measurable and often interdependent. Thermocouple measurements are widely used, but their capability to uniquely determine the thermal field remains challenging. In this context, a staged inverse calibration strategy based on Bayesian optimisation and automated Finite Element model generation with separated heating and cooling phases is investigated. Thereby, thermocouple-based optimisation is evaluated against infrared measurements and dilution geometry.</div><div>Thermocouple measurements enable identification of global heat input during heating as well as heat losses during cooling, but provide insufficient information about near-field temperature distributions. In the heating phase, conflicting objectives arise when comparing thermocouple and infrared data, but a correlation analysis identifies the peak-range thermocouple error as suitable measure for heat input calibration. In the cooling phase, both observables are governed by different parameters without strong competition, where the thermocouple error is primarily associated with heat losses, while the thermography data is primarily sensitive to the effective bead-substrate interface conductance. The results highlight that thermocouple-based calibration alone does not fully constrain the thermal field; identifiability can be improved by staged calibration with physically distinct observables, as investigated in this work.</div><div>The source code and calibration data are available at <span><span>https://github.com/InstituteOfMechanics/DEPOQUS_Parameter_Identification</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100407"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369026000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermal modelling of metal Directed Energy Deposition (DED) relies on the calibration of parameters that are not directly measurable and often interdependent. Thermocouple measurements are widely used, but their capability to uniquely determine the thermal field remains challenging. In this context, a staged inverse calibration strategy based on Bayesian optimisation and automated Finite Element model generation with separated heating and cooling phases is investigated. Thereby, thermocouple-based optimisation is evaluated against infrared measurements and dilution geometry.
Thermocouple measurements enable identification of global heat input during heating as well as heat losses during cooling, but provide insufficient information about near-field temperature distributions. In the heating phase, conflicting objectives arise when comparing thermocouple and infrared data, but a correlation analysis identifies the peak-range thermocouple error as suitable measure for heat input calibration. In the cooling phase, both observables are governed by different parameters without strong competition, where the thermocouple error is primarily associated with heat losses, while the thermography data is primarily sensitive to the effective bead-substrate interface conductance. The results highlight that thermocouple-based calibration alone does not fully constrain the thermal field; identifiability can be improved by staged calibration with physically distinct observables, as investigated in this work.
The source code and calibration data are available at https://github.com/InstituteOfMechanics/DEPOQUS_Parameter_Identification.
利用热电偶和红外热成像数据反演定向能沉积热模型
金属定向能沉积(DED)的热建模依赖于不能直接测量且经常相互依赖的参数的校准。热电偶测量被广泛使用,但其唯一确定热场的能力仍然具有挑战性。在此背景下,研究了一种基于贝叶斯优化和自动有限元模型生成的分段逆校准策略,该策略具有分离的加热和冷却阶段。因此,根据红外测量和稀释几何来评估基于热电偶的优化。热电偶测量能够识别加热过程中的全球热输入以及冷却过程中的热损失,但提供的近场温度分布信息不足。在加热阶段,当比较热电偶和红外数据时,会产生冲突的目标,但相关分析确定了峰值范围热电偶误差是热输入校准的合适测量。在冷却阶段,两个可观测值都受到不同参数的控制,没有强烈的竞争,其中热电偶误差主要与热损失有关,而热成像数据主要对有效的珠-基界面电导敏感。结果表明,仅基于热电偶的校准不能完全约束热场;可识别性可以通过与物理上不同的可观测物进行阶段校准来提高,正如本工作所研究的那样。源代码和校准数据可在https://github.com/InstituteOfMechanics/DEPOQUS_Parameter_Identification。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书