Habituation, den defence and predatory opportunism appear to have contributed to coyote aggression in an urban park

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Animal Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2026.123617
Nathan C. Lewis, Colleen Cassady St. Clair, William L. Harrower, Sarah Benson-Amram
{"title":"Habituation, den defence and predatory opportunism appear to have contributed to coyote aggression in an urban park","authors":"Nathan C. Lewis,&nbsp;Colleen Cassady St. Clair,&nbsp;William L. Harrower,&nbsp;Sarah Benson-Amram","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2026.123617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human–wildlife conflicts in urban settings are increasing and sometimes cause injury or mortality for people and wildlife. Conflicts may be exacerbated by large increases in outdoor human recreation, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, when people were prevented from gathering indoors and made increasing use of parks. This appears to have occurred in Vancouver's Stanley Park, British Columbia, Canada, where an unprecedented 45 coyote, <em>Canis latrans</em>, attacks on humans occurred between December 2020 and August 2021. To understand how this situation arose and might predict similar future problems, we compared reported aggressive human–coyote encounters and coyote sightings in Stanley Park from 2020 to 2021. We sought to identify predictors of aggression among spatial and temporal variables associated with human activity and coyote behaviour. We also compared characteristics of human victims of attacks to those of park users in 2024. Coyote aggression was higher (1) during pandemic restrictions on indoor gatherings (associated with higher human activity outdoors), (2) on trails with greater human activity, (3) during times of the day and week with relatively low human activity and (4) in areas closer to coyote dens and farther from potential sources of anthropogenic food, including garbage bins and picnic areas. While proximity to anthropogenic food sources did not positively predict aggression, anecdotal reports described the behaviour of the aggressive coyotes as likely food-conditioned. Relative to observed park users, victims of coyote attacks were more often running and alone when attacked, but there was no effect of a person's age or gender, or of domestic dog presence. Our results suggest coyote aggression in Stanley Park likely resulted from a combination of habituation, den defence, opportunistic predatory behaviours, and possibly food conditioning. To avoid similar situations in the future, wildlife managers could encourage the public to recreate in groups, during peak-use hours and away from known den sites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 123617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347226001545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human–wildlife conflicts in urban settings are increasing and sometimes cause injury or mortality for people and wildlife. Conflicts may be exacerbated by large increases in outdoor human recreation, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, when people were prevented from gathering indoors and made increasing use of parks. This appears to have occurred in Vancouver's Stanley Park, British Columbia, Canada, where an unprecedented 45 coyote, Canis latrans, attacks on humans occurred between December 2020 and August 2021. To understand how this situation arose and might predict similar future problems, we compared reported aggressive human–coyote encounters and coyote sightings in Stanley Park from 2020 to 2021. We sought to identify predictors of aggression among spatial and temporal variables associated with human activity and coyote behaviour. We also compared characteristics of human victims of attacks to those of park users in 2024. Coyote aggression was higher (1) during pandemic restrictions on indoor gatherings (associated with higher human activity outdoors), (2) on trails with greater human activity, (3) during times of the day and week with relatively low human activity and (4) in areas closer to coyote dens and farther from potential sources of anthropogenic food, including garbage bins and picnic areas. While proximity to anthropogenic food sources did not positively predict aggression, anecdotal reports described the behaviour of the aggressive coyotes as likely food-conditioned. Relative to observed park users, victims of coyote attacks were more often running and alone when attacked, but there was no effect of a person's age or gender, or of domestic dog presence. Our results suggest coyote aggression in Stanley Park likely resulted from a combination of habituation, den defence, opportunistic predatory behaviours, and possibly food conditioning. To avoid similar situations in the future, wildlife managers could encourage the public to recreate in groups, during peak-use hours and away from known den sites.
习惯化、巢穴防御和掠夺性机会主义似乎导致了郊狼在城市公园的攻击性
城市环境中人类与野生动物的冲突正在增加,有时会造成人和野生动物的伤害或死亡。户外人类娱乐活动的大量增加可能加剧冲突,例如在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,人们被阻止在室内聚集,并越来越多地使用公园。这似乎发生在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华的斯坦利公园,在2020年12月至2021年8月期间,那里发生了前所未有的45起土狼袭击人类的事件。为了了解这种情况是如何产生的,并可能预测未来类似的问题,我们比较了2020年至2021年斯坦利公园报告的攻击性人类土狼遭遇和土狼目击事件。我们试图在与人类活动和土狼行为相关的空间和时间变量中确定攻击的预测因子。我们还比较了2024年遭受袭击的人类受害者和公园使用者的特征。土狼的攻击性较高:(1)在大流行期间限制室内聚会(与户外人类活动较多有关),(2)在人类活动较多的小径上,(3)在一天和一周中人类活动相对较少的时间,以及(4)在靠近土狼巢穴和远离潜在人为食物来源的地区,包括垃圾箱和野餐区。虽然靠近人为食物来源并不能积极预测攻击性,但坊间报道称,具有攻击性的土狼的行为可能是由食物决定的。与观察到的公园使用者相比,土狼袭击的受害者在受到袭击时更经常是独自奔跑,但这与人的年龄、性别或家养狗的存在没有关系。我们的研究结果表明,斯坦利公园的土狼攻击可能是由习惯化、巢穴防御、机会主义掠食行为和可能的食物条件作用共同造成的。为了避免未来发生类似的情况,野生动物管理人员可以鼓励公众在高峰使用时间和远离已知巢穴的地方成群结队地玩耍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书