Cellular Morphometry for Interrogating Nanomaterial–Cell Interactions

IF 14.1 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of materials research Pub Date : 2026-07-24 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1021/accountsmr.6c00077
Ziqi Wang, Kenry
{"title":"Cellular Morphometry for Interrogating Nanomaterial–Cell Interactions","authors":"Ziqi Wang,&nbsp;Kenry","doi":"10.1021/accountsmr.6c00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interactions\r\nbetween nanomaterials and cells are fundamental\r\nto a plethora of theranostic and nanomedicine applications. For instance,\r\nto induce targeted therapeutic effects, theranostic nanomaterials\r\nneed to be selectively endocytosed by the target cells and at the\r\nsame time avoid the nonspecific uptake by nontarget cells. The specific\r\ncellular uptake of nanomaterials is influenced predominantly by the\r\nextent of nanomaterial–cell interactions. These interactions\r\nfurther dictate downstream biological processes, such as intracellular\r\ntrafficking, toxicological responses, and cellular clearance, ultimately\r\ndetermining therapeutic efficacy and biocompatibility. As such, active\r\nefforts have been geared toward formulating strategies to selectively\r\nmodulate and interrogate nanomaterial-cell interactions.</p><p>While\r\nmany biomarkers can be leveraged to elucidate nanomaterial–cell\r\ninteractions and the associated biological effects, one of the most\r\ndirect ways to achieve this is by visualizing changes in the morphology\r\nof the nanomaterial-treated cells through microscopy imaging. In fact,\r\nchanges in cellular morphology are often monitored along with variations\r\nin the expression of other biomarkers to determine the therapeutic\r\nperformance and safety profiles of various nanomaterials. A wide range\r\nof microscopy modalities, including bright-field, phase-contrast,\r\nscanning probe, and fluorescence techniques, have enabled direct visualization\r\nof nanomaterial binding, uptake, and localization at both cellular\r\nand subcellular levels. Although substantial insights have been gained\r\nfrom examining cellular morphology, many studies have been limited\r\nto manual inspection and qualitative observation, rendering these\r\ninterpretations highly subjective and potentially less reliable. Moreover,\r\nsubtle yet biologically significant morphological variations may remain\r\nundetected by using conventional visual assessment alone.</p><p>With\r\nthe increasing implementation of advanced computational techniques,\r\nparticularly those based on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine\r\nlearning, to process and analyze microscopy images, it has become\r\nincreasingly possible to probe cellular morphology quantitatively\r\n(i.e., cellular morphometry) to achieve more objective, reproducible,\r\nand reliable analyses and interpretations. By extracting numerical\r\ndescriptors related to cell size, shape, texture, and intensity from\r\nmicroscopy images, cellular morphometry transforms qualitative visual\r\ndata into multidimensional data sets that can be systematically analyzed\r\nto uncover hidden phenotypic patterns and structure–activity\r\nrelationships. This advancement can potentially unveil previously\r\nunrecognized insights into nanomaterial–cell interactions and\r\nprovide a more sensitive readout of cellular responses than conventional\r\nbiochemical assays.</p><p>Herein, in this Account, we describe our\r\ncontributions to elucidating\r\nnanomaterial–cell interactions and our recent efforts in developing\r\ncellular morphometric approaches to quantitatively interrogate these\r\ninteractions. We first highlight our use of both label-free and labeled\r\nmicroscopy techniques to visualize nanomaterial–cell interactions\r\nand derive key mechanistic insights. We next discuss the importance\r\nof quantitative evaluation of cellular morphology and recent advances\r\nin computational methods for quantitative morphological feature extraction\r\nand analysis. In particular, we emphasize the integration of AI-driven\r\nframeworks, including machine learning-based image segmentation and\r\nclassification algorithms, to enhance the accuracy, scalability, and\r\ninterpretability of cellular morphometric analysis. We conclude this\r\nAccount by outlining current challenges and discussing emerging opportunities\r\nfor advancing cellular morphometry as a powerful platform to interrogate\r\nnanomaterial–cell interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72040,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of materials research","volume":"7 7","pages":"777–788"},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of materials research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/accountsmr.6c00077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interactions between nanomaterials and cells are fundamental to a plethora of theranostic and nanomedicine applications. For instance, to induce targeted therapeutic effects, theranostic nanomaterials need to be selectively endocytosed by the target cells and at the same time avoid the nonspecific uptake by nontarget cells. The specific cellular uptake of nanomaterials is influenced predominantly by the extent of nanomaterial–cell interactions. These interactions further dictate downstream biological processes, such as intracellular trafficking, toxicological responses, and cellular clearance, ultimately determining therapeutic efficacy and biocompatibility. As such, active efforts have been geared toward formulating strategies to selectively modulate and interrogate nanomaterial-cell interactions.

While many biomarkers can be leveraged to elucidate nanomaterial–cell interactions and the associated biological effects, one of the most direct ways to achieve this is by visualizing changes in the morphology of the nanomaterial-treated cells through microscopy imaging. In fact, changes in cellular morphology are often monitored along with variations in the expression of other biomarkers to determine the therapeutic performance and safety profiles of various nanomaterials. A wide range of microscopy modalities, including bright-field, phase-contrast, scanning probe, and fluorescence techniques, have enabled direct visualization of nanomaterial binding, uptake, and localization at both cellular and subcellular levels. Although substantial insights have been gained from examining cellular morphology, many studies have been limited to manual inspection and qualitative observation, rendering these interpretations highly subjective and potentially less reliable. Moreover, subtle yet biologically significant morphological variations may remain undetected by using conventional visual assessment alone.

With the increasing implementation of advanced computational techniques, particularly those based on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, to process and analyze microscopy images, it has become increasingly possible to probe cellular morphology quantitatively (i.e., cellular morphometry) to achieve more objective, reproducible, and reliable analyses and interpretations. By extracting numerical descriptors related to cell size, shape, texture, and intensity from microscopy images, cellular morphometry transforms qualitative visual data into multidimensional data sets that can be systematically analyzed to uncover hidden phenotypic patterns and structure–activity relationships. This advancement can potentially unveil previously unrecognized insights into nanomaterial–cell interactions and provide a more sensitive readout of cellular responses than conventional biochemical assays.

Herein, in this Account, we describe our contributions to elucidating nanomaterial–cell interactions and our recent efforts in developing cellular morphometric approaches to quantitatively interrogate these interactions. We first highlight our use of both label-free and labeled microscopy techniques to visualize nanomaterial–cell interactions and derive key mechanistic insights. We next discuss the importance of quantitative evaluation of cellular morphology and recent advances in computational methods for quantitative morphological feature extraction and analysis. In particular, we emphasize the integration of AI-driven frameworks, including machine learning-based image segmentation and classification algorithms, to enhance the accuracy, scalability, and interpretability of cellular morphometric analysis. We conclude this Account by outlining current challenges and discussing emerging opportunities for advancing cellular morphometry as a powerful platform to interrogate nanomaterial–cell interactions.

Abstract Image

研究纳米材料-细胞相互作用的细胞形态计量学
纳米材料和细胞之间的相互作用是大量治疗和纳米医学应用的基础。例如,为了诱导靶向治疗效果,治疗性纳米材料需要被靶细胞选择性内吞,同时避免被非靶细胞非特异性摄取。纳米材料的特异性细胞摄取主要受纳米材料-细胞相互作用程度的影响。这些相互作用进一步决定了下游生物过程,如细胞内运输、毒理学反应和细胞清除,最终决定了治疗效果和生物相容性。因此,积极的努力已经面向制定策略,选择性地调节和询问纳米材料-细胞的相互作用。虽然可以利用许多生物标志物来阐明纳米材料-细胞相互作用和相关的生物效应,但实现这一目标的最直接方法之一是通过显微镜成像可视化纳米材料处理细胞的形态变化。事实上,通常监测细胞形态的变化以及其他生物标志物的表达变化,以确定各种纳米材料的治疗性能和安全性。广泛的显微镜模式,包括明场、相衬、扫描探针和荧光技术,已经能够在细胞和亚细胞水平上直接观察纳米材料的结合、摄取和定位。虽然从检查细胞形态中获得了大量的见解,但许多研究仅限于人工检查和定性观察,使得这些解释非常主观,并且可能不太可靠。此外,仅使用传统的视觉评估可能无法检测到细微但具有生物学意义的形态变化。随着越来越多的先进计算技术的实施,特别是那些基于人工智能(AI)和机器学习的技术,来处理和分析显微镜图像,越来越有可能定量地探测细胞形态(即细胞形态学)。以实现更客观、可重复和可靠的分析和解释。通过从显微镜图像中提取与细胞大小,形状,纹理和强度相关的数字描述符,细胞形态计量学将定性视觉数据转换为多维数据集,可以系统地分析以揭示隐藏的表型模式和结构-活动关系。这一进展可能会揭示以前未被认识到的纳米材料-细胞相互作用的见解,并提供比传统生化分析更敏感的细胞反应读数。在本文中,我们描述了我们在阐明纳米材料-细胞相互作用方面的贡献,以及我们最近在开发细胞形态测量方法以定量询问这些相互作用方面的努力。我们首先强调了我们使用无标记和标记显微镜技术来可视化纳米材料-细胞相互作用,并得出关键的机制见解。接下来,我们将讨论细胞形态学定量评价的重要性以及用于定量形态学特征提取和分析的计算方法的最新进展。我们特别强调人工智能驱动框架的集成,包括基于机器学习的图像分割和分类算法,以提高细胞形态测量分析的准确性、可扩展性和可解释性。最后,我们概述了当前的挑战,并讨论了推进细胞形态测量作为一个强大的平台来询问异常物质-细胞相互作用的新机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书