{"title":"Cellular Morphometry for Interrogating Nanomaterial–Cell Interactions","authors":"Ziqi Wang, Kenry","doi":"10.1021/accountsmr.6c00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The interactions\r\nbetween nanomaterials and cells are fundamental\r\nto a plethora of theranostic and nanomedicine applications. For instance,\r\nto induce targeted therapeutic effects, theranostic nanomaterials\r\nneed to be selectively endocytosed by the target cells and at the\r\nsame time avoid the nonspecific uptake by nontarget cells. The specific\r\ncellular uptake of nanomaterials is influenced predominantly by the\r\nextent of nanomaterial–cell interactions. These interactions\r\nfurther dictate downstream biological processes, such as intracellular\r\ntrafficking, toxicological responses, and cellular clearance, ultimately\r\ndetermining therapeutic efficacy and biocompatibility. As such, active\r\nefforts have been geared toward formulating strategies to selectively\r\nmodulate and interrogate nanomaterial-cell interactions.</p><p>While\r\nmany biomarkers can be leveraged to elucidate nanomaterial–cell\r\ninteractions and the associated biological effects, one of the most\r\ndirect ways to achieve this is by visualizing changes in the morphology\r\nof the nanomaterial-treated cells through microscopy imaging. In fact,\r\nchanges in cellular morphology are often monitored along with variations\r\nin the expression of other biomarkers to determine the therapeutic\r\nperformance and safety profiles of various nanomaterials. A wide range\r\nof microscopy modalities, including bright-field, phase-contrast,\r\nscanning probe, and fluorescence techniques, have enabled direct visualization\r\nof nanomaterial binding, uptake, and localization at both cellular\r\nand subcellular levels. Although substantial insights have been gained\r\nfrom examining cellular morphology, many studies have been limited\r\nto manual inspection and qualitative observation, rendering these\r\ninterpretations highly subjective and potentially less reliable. Moreover,\r\nsubtle yet biologically significant morphological variations may remain\r\nundetected by using conventional visual assessment alone.</p><p>With\r\nthe increasing implementation of advanced computational techniques,\r\nparticularly those based on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine\r\nlearning, to process and analyze microscopy images, it has become\r\nincreasingly possible to probe cellular morphology quantitatively\r\n(i.e., cellular morphometry) to achieve more objective, reproducible,\r\nand reliable analyses and interpretations. By extracting numerical\r\ndescriptors related to cell size, shape, texture, and intensity from\r\nmicroscopy images, cellular morphometry transforms qualitative visual\r\ndata into multidimensional data sets that can be systematically analyzed\r\nto uncover hidden phenotypic patterns and structure–activity\r\nrelationships. This advancement can potentially unveil previously\r\nunrecognized insights into nanomaterial–cell interactions and\r\nprovide a more sensitive readout of cellular responses than conventional\r\nbiochemical assays.</p><p>Herein, in this Account, we describe our\r\ncontributions to elucidating\r\nnanomaterial–cell interactions and our recent efforts in developing\r\ncellular morphometric approaches to quantitatively interrogate these\r\ninteractions. We first highlight our use of both label-free and labeled\r\nmicroscopy techniques to visualize nanomaterial–cell interactions\r\nand derive key mechanistic insights. We next discuss the importance\r\nof quantitative evaluation of cellular morphology and recent advances\r\nin computational methods for quantitative morphological feature extraction\r\nand analysis. In particular, we emphasize the integration of AI-driven\r\nframeworks, including machine learning-based image segmentation and\r\nclassification algorithms, to enhance the accuracy, scalability, and\r\ninterpretability of cellular morphometric analysis. We conclude this\r\nAccount by outlining current challenges and discussing emerging opportunities\r\nfor advancing cellular morphometry as a powerful platform to interrogate\r\nnanomaterial–cell interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72040,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of materials research","volume":"7 7","pages":"777–788"},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of materials research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/accountsmr.6c00077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The interactions
between nanomaterials and cells are fundamental
to a plethora of theranostic and nanomedicine applications. For instance,
to induce targeted therapeutic effects, theranostic nanomaterials
need to be selectively endocytosed by the target cells and at the
same time avoid the nonspecific uptake by nontarget cells. The specific
cellular uptake of nanomaterials is influenced predominantly by the
extent of nanomaterial–cell interactions. These interactions
further dictate downstream biological processes, such as intracellular
trafficking, toxicological responses, and cellular clearance, ultimately
determining therapeutic efficacy and biocompatibility. As such, active
efforts have been geared toward formulating strategies to selectively
modulate and interrogate nanomaterial-cell interactions.
While
many biomarkers can be leveraged to elucidate nanomaterial–cell
interactions and the associated biological effects, one of the most
direct ways to achieve this is by visualizing changes in the morphology
of the nanomaterial-treated cells through microscopy imaging. In fact,
changes in cellular morphology are often monitored along with variations
in the expression of other biomarkers to determine the therapeutic
performance and safety profiles of various nanomaterials. A wide range
of microscopy modalities, including bright-field, phase-contrast,
scanning probe, and fluorescence techniques, have enabled direct visualization
of nanomaterial binding, uptake, and localization at both cellular
and subcellular levels. Although substantial insights have been gained
from examining cellular morphology, many studies have been limited
to manual inspection and qualitative observation, rendering these
interpretations highly subjective and potentially less reliable. Moreover,
subtle yet biologically significant morphological variations may remain
undetected by using conventional visual assessment alone.
With
the increasing implementation of advanced computational techniques,
particularly those based on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine
learning, to process and analyze microscopy images, it has become
increasingly possible to probe cellular morphology quantitatively
(i.e., cellular morphometry) to achieve more objective, reproducible,
and reliable analyses and interpretations. By extracting numerical
descriptors related to cell size, shape, texture, and intensity from
microscopy images, cellular morphometry transforms qualitative visual
data into multidimensional data sets that can be systematically analyzed
to uncover hidden phenotypic patterns and structure–activity
relationships. This advancement can potentially unveil previously
unrecognized insights into nanomaterial–cell interactions and
provide a more sensitive readout of cellular responses than conventional
biochemical assays.
Herein, in this Account, we describe our
contributions to elucidating
nanomaterial–cell interactions and our recent efforts in developing
cellular morphometric approaches to quantitatively interrogate these
interactions. We first highlight our use of both label-free and labeled
microscopy techniques to visualize nanomaterial–cell interactions
and derive key mechanistic insights. We next discuss the importance
of quantitative evaluation of cellular morphology and recent advances
in computational methods for quantitative morphological feature extraction
and analysis. In particular, we emphasize the integration of AI-driven
frameworks, including machine learning-based image segmentation and
classification algorithms, to enhance the accuracy, scalability, and
interpretability of cellular morphometric analysis. We conclude this
Account by outlining current challenges and discussing emerging opportunities
for advancing cellular morphometry as a powerful platform to interrogate
nanomaterial–cell interactions.