{"title":"Carbon Source-Shaped Differences in Keystone Taxa Driving SNEDPR in Anaerobic/Oxic/Anoxic–Aerobic Granular Sludge (AOA–AGS) Systems Treating Low C/N Wastewater","authors":"Ying Han, Hui Sun, Xinrui Zhang, Xinru Li, Yueying Song, Peng Bi, Liang Zhu, Shiquan Ren, Guangchao Yang, Jingwei Ma, Qiulai He","doi":"10.1021/acsestengg.6c00183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anaerobic/oxic/anoxic–aerobic\r\ngranular sludge (AOA–AGS)\r\nis an emerging and promising process for wastewater treatment, performing\r\nsimultaneous nitrification, endogenous denitrification, and phosphorus\r\nremoval (SNEDPR). However, as carbon source type influences microbial\r\ncommunity and metabolisms, its impacts on the process remain unclear.\r\nIn this study, the impacts of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and glucose\r\nas sole carbon sources on SNEDPR of AOA–AGS systems were investigated.\r\nAcetate and propionate achieved superior nitrogen and phosphorus removal\r\nefficiency (over 85% on average) compared to butyrate and glucose.\r\nVaried carbon sources led to distinct microbial ecology and metabolisms.\r\nAcetate preferred PHA metabolisms and had the fastest responses to\r\nnitrogen and phosphorus removal, primarily via <em>Candidatus_Accumulibacter</em> and <em>Candidatus_Competibacter</em>. Propionate\r\nobtained sufficient reducing power by enhancing the glyoxylate cycle,\r\nmainly via <em>Lysobacter</em>. Butyrate had\r\nmoderate treatment performance, and glucose required additional fermentation\r\nsteps, mainly completed via <em>Candidatus_Saccharibacteria</em>. Keystone taxa and abundant taxa shaped by each carbon source contributed\r\nto systems’ metabolisms. This study demonstrated that carbon\r\nsources shape microbial communities via determining pathways, thereby\r\nshaping the functions, microbial ecology, and metabolisms of the systems,\r\nproviding mechanistic insights and practical guidance for rational\r\ncarbon source selection and management in AOA–AGS systems treating\r\nlow C/N wastewater.</p>","PeriodicalId":7008,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T engineering","volume":"6 6","pages":"1870–1881"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestengg.6c00183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anaerobic/oxic/anoxic–aerobic
granular sludge (AOA–AGS)
is an emerging and promising process for wastewater treatment, performing
simultaneous nitrification, endogenous denitrification, and phosphorus
removal (SNEDPR). However, as carbon source type influences microbial
community and metabolisms, its impacts on the process remain unclear.
In this study, the impacts of acetate, propionate, butyrate, and glucose
as sole carbon sources on SNEDPR of AOA–AGS systems were investigated.
Acetate and propionate achieved superior nitrogen and phosphorus removal
efficiency (over 85% on average) compared to butyrate and glucose.
Varied carbon sources led to distinct microbial ecology and metabolisms.
Acetate preferred PHA metabolisms and had the fastest responses to
nitrogen and phosphorus removal, primarily via Candidatus_Accumulibacter and Candidatus_Competibacter. Propionate
obtained sufficient reducing power by enhancing the glyoxylate cycle,
mainly via Lysobacter. Butyrate had
moderate treatment performance, and glucose required additional fermentation
steps, mainly completed via Candidatus_Saccharibacteria. Keystone taxa and abundant taxa shaped by each carbon source contributed
to systems’ metabolisms. This study demonstrated that carbon
sources shape microbial communities via determining pathways, thereby
shaping the functions, microbial ecology, and metabolisms of the systems,
providing mechanistic insights and practical guidance for rational
carbon source selection and management in AOA–AGS systems treating
low C/N wastewater.
期刊介绍:
ACS ES&T Engineering publishes impactful research and review articles across all realms of environmental technology and engineering, employing a rigorous peer-review process. As a specialized journal, it aims to provide an international platform for research and innovation, inviting contributions on materials technologies, processes, data analytics, and engineering systems that can effectively manage, protect, and remediate air, water, and soil quality, as well as treat wastes and recover resources.
The journal encourages research that supports informed decision-making within complex engineered systems and is grounded in mechanistic science and analytics, describing intricate environmental engineering systems. It considers papers presenting novel advancements, spanning from laboratory discovery to field-based application. However, case or demonstration studies lacking significant scientific advancements and technological innovations are not within its scope.
Contributions containing experimental and/or theoretical methods, rooted in engineering principles and integrated with knowledge from other disciplines, are welcomed.