Using a Machine-Learning Algorithm to Identify Palliative Care Needs in a Primary Care Population: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2026-06-18 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26892820261460679
Mairead M Bartley, Jordan C Karow, Rachel M Wiste, Ethan P Heinzen, Patrick M Wilson, Gabriel O Demuth, Shusaku W Asai, Curtis B Storlie, Rachel D Havyer
{"title":"Using a Machine-Learning Algorithm to Identify Palliative Care Needs in a Primary Care Population: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Mairead M Bartley, Jordan C Karow, Rachel M Wiste, Ethan P Heinzen, Patrick M Wilson, Gabriel O Demuth, Shusaku W Asai, Curtis B Storlie, Rachel D Havyer","doi":"10.1177/26892820261460679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Early palliative care can improve end-of-life outcomes, but referrals to palliative care specialists can be delayed in the primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study assessed the effect of a machine-learning algorithm on time to palliative care in a primary care population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible if they were empaneled with a primary care provider (PCP) from July 20, 2020, through May 30, 2021. The algorithm evaluated their health records and presented patients who were predicted to have the greatest need for palliative care. Records were then reviewed by palliative care specialists, and patients were randomized in a stepped-wedge fashion to have a referral notification sent to their PCPs if unmet palliative care needs were verified. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated with Poisson regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 127,080 patients evaluated, 934 had their health records presented for review. Some patients were repeatedly presented by the algorithm (total presentations: 1592). In the intervention arm, PCPs were prompted to order a palliative care consultation for 142 patients. The time to 0.1% of the population receiving a palliative care consultation was 60.9 days for the intervention arm versus 71.8 days for the control arm (probability of a shorter time with the intervention, 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A machine-learning algorithm to identify palliative care needs was successfully integrated into a primary care practice. More work is needed to improve the workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"7 ","pages":"26892820261460679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13422726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26892820261460679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Early palliative care can improve end-of-life outcomes, but referrals to palliative care specialists can be delayed in the primary care setting.

Objective: This pilot study assessed the effect of a machine-learning algorithm on time to palliative care in a primary care population.

Methods: Patients (aged ≥18 years) were eligible if they were empaneled with a primary care provider (PCP) from July 20, 2020, through May 30, 2021. The algorithm evaluated their health records and presented patients who were predicted to have the greatest need for palliative care. Records were then reviewed by palliative care specialists, and patients were randomized in a stepped-wedge fashion to have a referral notification sent to their PCPs if unmet palliative care needs were verified. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated with Poisson regression models.

Results: Of the 127,080 patients evaluated, 934 had their health records presented for review. Some patients were repeatedly presented by the algorithm (total presentations: 1592). In the intervention arm, PCPs were prompted to order a palliative care consultation for 142 patients. The time to 0.1% of the population receiving a palliative care consultation was 60.9 days for the intervention arm versus 71.8 days for the control arm (probability of a shorter time with the intervention, 0.88).

Conclusion: A machine-learning algorithm to identify palliative care needs was successfully integrated into a primary care practice. More work is needed to improve the workflow.

使用机器学习算法识别初级保健人群的姑息治疗需求:一项试点研究。
背景:早期姑息治疗可以改善临终结果,但转诊到姑息治疗专家可能会延迟在初级保健设置。目的:本初步研究评估了机器学习算法对初级保健人群姑息治疗时间的影响。方法:如果患者(年龄≥18岁)在2020年7月20日至2021年5月30日期间接受了初级保健提供者(PCP)的复查,则符合条件。该算法评估了他们的健康记录,并提出了预计最需要姑息治疗的患者。然后,姑息治疗专家对记录进行了审查,并将患者按阶梯式随机分组,如果证实未满足姑息治疗需求,则将转诊通知发送给其pcp。用泊松回归模型评估时间到事件的结果。结果:在评估的127,080例患者中,有934例患者的健康记录供审查。部分患者被算法反复呈现(总呈现1592例)。在干预组,提示pcp为142名患者安排姑息治疗咨询。0.1%的人群接受姑息治疗咨询的时间,干预组为60.9天,对照组为71.8天(干预组时间较短的概率为0.88)。结论:一种识别姑息治疗需求的机器学习算法已成功整合到初级保健实践中。需要做更多的工作来改进工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书