Physician-Scientist Training and the Future of Academic Medicine.

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
James Frank, Başak Çoruh, Jeremy Katzen, Dean Sheppard, Kristin M Burkart, Maryl Kreider
{"title":"Physician-Scientist Training and the Future of Academic Medicine.","authors":"James Frank, Başak Çoruh, Jeremy Katzen, Dean Sheppard, Kristin M Burkart, Maryl Kreider","doi":"10.1093/atsscholar/aapag041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physician-scientists bring a critical perspective to scientific discovery and contribute to a significant proportion of medical breakthroughs that improve patient care; however, recent reductions in the proportion of pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows pursuing careers as physician-scientists, mirroring trends in other medical specialties, raise concern about the long-term viability of the current training paradigm. Numerous factors potentially contribute to the drop in trainees pursuing research careers, including reduced availability of research training opportunities during residency and fellowship, increasing clinical and research training complexity, a longer timeline to career independence, and funding uncertainties. Increasing educational debt, an often rigid training structure, and declining resources also contribute. This 2025 American Thoracic Society International Conference symposium provided an overview of these challenges, as well as potential solutions to preserve this vital career path, including the need for critical evaluation of the current training model, reexamination of success metrics, and focused efforts to create more supportive, fair, and collaborative training environments. In response to growing concerns about the sustainability of the physicians-scientist training pathway, education leaders and physician-scientists from around the country presented a special symposium at the 2025 American Thoracic Society International Conference. Content selection was developed through iterative discussion among the presenting authors. The session highlighted important recent trends reflecting decreased engagement with this pathway, challenges faced by trainees, and the potential roles that administrative and education leaders might play in reimagining the physician-scientist training paradigm. This paper summarizes key elements and messages of the session and highlights the opportunity for stakeholders to collaboratively develop a clearer vision of the future for this critical career path. This session highlighted new opportunities, including maximizing competency-based training, enhancing organizational supports, a sharper focus on professional identity formation, and reframing our understanding of what constitutes high-value research contributions by physicians (Table).</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/atsscholar/aapag041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physician-scientists bring a critical perspective to scientific discovery and contribute to a significant proportion of medical breakthroughs that improve patient care; however, recent reductions in the proportion of pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows pursuing careers as physician-scientists, mirroring trends in other medical specialties, raise concern about the long-term viability of the current training paradigm. Numerous factors potentially contribute to the drop in trainees pursuing research careers, including reduced availability of research training opportunities during residency and fellowship, increasing clinical and research training complexity, a longer timeline to career independence, and funding uncertainties. Increasing educational debt, an often rigid training structure, and declining resources also contribute. This 2025 American Thoracic Society International Conference symposium provided an overview of these challenges, as well as potential solutions to preserve this vital career path, including the need for critical evaluation of the current training model, reexamination of success metrics, and focused efforts to create more supportive, fair, and collaborative training environments. In response to growing concerns about the sustainability of the physicians-scientist training pathway, education leaders and physician-scientists from around the country presented a special symposium at the 2025 American Thoracic Society International Conference. Content selection was developed through iterative discussion among the presenting authors. The session highlighted important recent trends reflecting decreased engagement with this pathway, challenges faced by trainees, and the potential roles that administrative and education leaders might play in reimagining the physician-scientist training paradigm. This paper summarizes key elements and messages of the session and highlights the opportunity for stakeholders to collaboratively develop a clearer vision of the future for this critical career path. This session highlighted new opportunities, including maximizing competency-based training, enhancing organizational supports, a sharper focus on professional identity formation, and reframing our understanding of what constitutes high-value research contributions by physicians (Table).

医师-科学家培训和学术医学的未来。
医师科学家为科学发现带来了批判性的视角,并为改善患者护理的重大医学突破做出了贡献;然而,最近肺病和危重病医学研究员追求医师科学家职业的比例减少,反映了其他医学专业的趋势,这引起了人们对当前培训模式长期可行性的担忧。许多因素可能导致实习生追求研究事业的减少,包括住院医师和研究员期间研究培训机会的减少,临床和研究培训复杂性的增加,职业独立性的时间线延长,以及资金的不确定性。不断增加的教育债务、往往僵化的培训结构和不断减少的资源也是原因之一。2025年美国胸科学会国际会议研讨会概述了这些挑战,以及保留这一重要职业道路的潜在解决方案,包括对当前培训模式的批判性评估,对成功指标的重新检查,以及集中努力创造更多支持性,公平性和协作性的培训环境。为了回应人们对医生-科学家培训途径的可持续性日益增长的担忧,来自全国各地的教育领导者和医生-科学家在2025年美国胸科学会国际会议上举行了一次特别研讨会。内容选择是通过发言作者之间的反复讨论而发展起来的。会议强调了最近一些重要的趋势,这些趋势反映了对这一途径的参与减少,学员面临的挑战,以及行政和教育领导者在重新构想医生-科学家培训范式方面可能发挥的潜在作用。本文总结了会议的关键要素和信息,并强调了利益相关者合作制定这一关键职业道路未来更清晰愿景的机会。这次会议强调了新的机会,包括最大限度地提高基于能力的培训,加强组织支持,更加关注专业身份的形成,以及重新定义我们对医生高价值研究贡献的理解(表)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书