Evidence that prior endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization protects against subsequent shunt failure among infants treated for hydrocephalus.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Benjamin C Warf, Emma N Puglisi, Dylan S Keusch, Alfred P See, Katherine G Holste, Scellig S D Stone
{"title":"Evidence that prior endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization protects against subsequent shunt failure among infants treated for hydrocephalus.","authors":"Benjamin C Warf, Emma N Puglisi, Dylan S Keusch, Alfred P See, Katherine G Holste, Scellig S D Stone","doi":"10.3171/2026.3.PEDS25681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear whether shunt survival differs for infants in whom prior endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization (ETV/CPC) failed compared with those treated initially by shunt placement. Results among four previous studies spanning a range of age groups have suggested either no effect or a protective effect of prior endoscopic treatment on shunt survival. The aim of this study was to determine whether prior ETV/CPC positively impacts shunt survival among infants with hydrocephalus regardless of etiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a historical cohort review of all patients under 12 months corrected age who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement either with or without prior ETV/CPC at their institution between December 2008 and December 2023. Statistical analyses included Cox regression modeling, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and log-rank testing to evaluate the time to shunt failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 122 infants with and 46 infants without prior ETV/CPC who underwent VPS placement. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding sex, race, gestational age at birth, or corrected age at initial treatment for hydrocephalus. The distribution of etiologies and initial frontal-occipital horn ratios (FOHRs) were similar. The median pre-shunt FOHR was greater in the ETV/CPC group. The patients in the primary shunt placement group were all candidates for ETV/CPC based on retrospective review. Seventy-one infants (58%) with prior ETV/CPC remained free of shunt revision compared with 17 infants (37%) with primary shunt placement (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1; p = 0.01). The estimated 2-year shunt survival probability was 75% with and 50% without prior ETV/CPC (log-rank p = 0.001). The estimated 5-year survival was 60% with and 45% without prior ETV/CPC (p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infants who underwent ETV/CPC prior to VPS placement had better shunt survival than those who did not. ETV/CPC might reduce the risk of subsequent shunt failure, indicating the potential benefit of the procedure even when it fails.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"494-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.3.PEDS25681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear whether shunt survival differs for infants in whom prior endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization (ETV/CPC) failed compared with those treated initially by shunt placement. Results among four previous studies spanning a range of age groups have suggested either no effect or a protective effect of prior endoscopic treatment on shunt survival. The aim of this study was to determine whether prior ETV/CPC positively impacts shunt survival among infants with hydrocephalus regardless of etiology.

Methods: The authors conducted a historical cohort review of all patients under 12 months corrected age who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement either with or without prior ETV/CPC at their institution between December 2008 and December 2023. Statistical analyses included Cox regression modeling, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and log-rank testing to evaluate the time to shunt failure.

Results: The study included 122 infants with and 46 infants without prior ETV/CPC who underwent VPS placement. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding sex, race, gestational age at birth, or corrected age at initial treatment for hydrocephalus. The distribution of etiologies and initial frontal-occipital horn ratios (FOHRs) were similar. The median pre-shunt FOHR was greater in the ETV/CPC group. The patients in the primary shunt placement group were all candidates for ETV/CPC based on retrospective review. Seventy-one infants (58%) with prior ETV/CPC remained free of shunt revision compared with 17 infants (37%) with primary shunt placement (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1; p = 0.01). The estimated 2-year shunt survival probability was 75% with and 50% without prior ETV/CPC (log-rank p = 0.001). The estimated 5-year survival was 60% with and 45% without prior ETV/CPC (p = 0.045).

Conclusions: Infants who underwent ETV/CPC prior to VPS placement had better shunt survival than those who did not. ETV/CPC might reduce the risk of subsequent shunt failure, indicating the potential benefit of the procedure even when it fails.

有证据表明,先前的内镜下第三脑室造口术与脉络膜丛烧灼可以防止脑积水婴儿随后的分流失败。
目的:尚不清楚先前内镜下第三脑室造瘘合并脉络膜丛烧灼(ETV/CPC)失败的婴儿与最初通过分流器放置治疗的婴儿相比,分流器的存活率是否不同。先前的四项研究的结果涵盖了一系列年龄组,表明先前的内窥镜治疗对分流术的生存没有影响或有保护作用。本研究的目的是确定先前的ETV/CPC是否会对脑积水患儿的分流生存产生积极影响,而不考虑病因。方法:作者对2008年12月至2023年12月期间在其所在机构接受脑室-腹膜分流术(VPS)放置的所有12个月以下矫正年龄的患者进行了历史队列回顾,无论是否有先前的ETV/CPC。统计分析包括Cox回归模型、Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和log-rank检验来评估分流失败的时间。结果:研究纳入了122名有ETV/CPC的婴儿和46名没有ETV/CPC的婴儿,他们接受了VPS安置。在性别、种族、出生胎龄或初次治疗脑积水时的校正年龄方面,组间无统计学显著差异。病因分布和初始额枕角比(fohr)相似。ETV/CPC组中位分流前FOHR更大。经回顾性分析,初级分流置入组患者均为ETV/CPC候选患者。先前ETV/CPC的71名婴儿(58%)没有进行分流器翻修,而初次放置分流器的17名婴儿(37%)没有(OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1; p = 0.01)。有ETV/CPC的患者2年的存活率为75%,没有ETV/CPC的患者为50% (log-rank p = 0.001)。有ETV/CPC的患者5年生存率为60%,无ETV/CPC的患者为45% (p = 0.045)。结论:在VPS放置前接受ETV/CPC的婴儿比未接受的婴儿有更好的分流生存。ETV/CPC可能会降低后续分流失败的风险,这表明即使分流失败,该手术也有潜在的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书