Dosimetric feasibility of carbon-ion radiotherapy for ocular melanomas with local effect model-based treatment planning system.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Yuze Yang, Jiayao Sun, Xue Ming, Weixu Hu, Lin Kong, Yinxiangzi Sheng
{"title":"Dosimetric feasibility of carbon-ion radiotherapy for ocular melanomas with local effect model-based treatment planning system.","authors":"Yuze Yang, Jiayao Sun, Xue Ming, Weixu Hu, Lin Kong, Yinxiangzi Sheng","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrag062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the dosimetric feasibility of carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for ocular melanoma (OM) using a local effect model-I-based treatment planning system (TPS) combined with pencil beam scanning delivery. Cube-shaped targets were designed based on the experience of CIRT for OM at the National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST). Treatment plans used the local effect model-I-based TPS (Syngo® V13C, SIEMENS, Germany) prescribing an absorbed dose consistent with values reported in the literature. A conversion factor (CF) was established to convert the QST dose to LEM based relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose. The physical doses were verified by an in-house Monte Carlo program and measurement. The CF for the LEM, equivalent to the QST RBE-prescribed dose of 70 Gy (RBE) over 5 fractions, was established as 0.65. The 3D gamma passing rate between TPS and MC was ≥94% using 3%-3 mm criteria. Mean dose deviations between the TPS and measurement were ≤±1.61% for all targets sizes except the smallest one (7 mm). Mean distance-to-agreement was <1 mm for all plans except one with a range shifter (distance-to-agreement = 2.92 mm). Phantom cases showed a lateral penumbra of 5.4-6.2 mm, and distal dose fall-off measures 3.6 and 5.6 mm. The results underscore the need for RBE-weighted dose conversion when applying QST's CIRT experience to OM treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"746-753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrag062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the dosimetric feasibility of carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for ocular melanoma (OM) using a local effect model-I-based treatment planning system (TPS) combined with pencil beam scanning delivery. Cube-shaped targets were designed based on the experience of CIRT for OM at the National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST). Treatment plans used the local effect model-I-based TPS (Syngo® V13C, SIEMENS, Germany) prescribing an absorbed dose consistent with values reported in the literature. A conversion factor (CF) was established to convert the QST dose to LEM based relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose. The physical doses were verified by an in-house Monte Carlo program and measurement. The CF for the LEM, equivalent to the QST RBE-prescribed dose of 70 Gy (RBE) over 5 fractions, was established as 0.65. The 3D gamma passing rate between TPS and MC was ≥94% using 3%-3 mm criteria. Mean dose deviations between the TPS and measurement were ≤±1.61% for all targets sizes except the smallest one (7 mm). Mean distance-to-agreement was <1 mm for all plans except one with a range shifter (distance-to-agreement = 2.92 mm). Phantom cases showed a lateral penumbra of 5.4-6.2 mm, and distal dose fall-off measures 3.6 and 5.6 mm. The results underscore the need for RBE-weighted dose conversion when applying QST's CIRT experience to OM treatment.

基于局部效应模型的治疗计划系统碳离子放射治疗眼部黑色素瘤的剂量学可行性。
本研究利用基于局部效应模型i的治疗计划系统(TPS)结合铅笔束扫描递送,评估了碳离子放射治疗(CIRT)治疗眼黑色素瘤(OM)的剂量学可行性。根据美国国家量子科学与技术研究院(QST) CIRT OM的经验,设计了立方体靶。治疗方案采用基于局部效应模型i的TPS (Syngo®V13C, SIEMENS, Germany),规定与文献报道值一致的吸收剂量。建立了一个转换因子(CF),将QST剂量转换为基于LEM的相对生物有效性(RBE)加权剂量。物理剂量由内部蒙特卡罗程序和测量验证。LEM的CF为0.65,相当于QST RBE规定剂量70 Gy (RBE) / 5个分数。使用3%- 3mm标准,TPS和MC之间的3D伽马通过率≥94%。除最小靶标(7 mm)外,所有靶标尺寸的TPS与测量值的平均剂量偏差均≤±1.61%。平均距离为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书