Monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with severe asthma and COPD: rethinking treatment pathways and success.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Rachel Burton, Maria Puthoor, Fred Fyles, Lisa Lewis, Hannah Joplin, Hassan Burhan
{"title":"Monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with severe asthma and COPD: rethinking treatment pathways and success.","authors":"Rachel Burton, Maria Puthoor, Fred Fyles, Lisa Lewis, Hannah Joplin, Hassan Burhan","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on the use of dupilumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommends using dupilumab as an add-on therapy for patients with uncontrolled COPD and raised blood eosinophils who either have one severe exacerbation or two moderate exacerbations despite triple therapy. This contrasts with the guidance for commencing and continuing monoclonal antibody therapy (MAb) in asthma and will have significant implications for severe asthma services caring for patients with coexisting asthma and COPD or those with asthma and a significant smoking history. Patients with asthma and COPD often experience poorer outcomes than patients with asthma or COPD alone. They are traditionally managed according to asthma pharmacotherapy guidelines; however, under the new guidance this may change. Our perspective is supported by local audit data helping us to reflect on our current practice as a large tertiary severe asthma service of initiating MAb in patients with coexisting asthma and COPD.Disparities in eligibility and access to dupilumab in asthma and COPD guidelines expose key challenges about the best clinical setting for managing patients with coexisting disease, the need for distinct treatment pathways and personalised definitions of treatment success, and whether the current positioning of dupilumab as a second-line therapy within severe asthma pathways in England remains appropriate. Addressing these issues will be critical to supporting equitable clinically appropriate access to monoclonal antibodies in patients with coexisting asthma and COPD in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13435910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2026-004232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on the use of dupilumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommends using dupilumab as an add-on therapy for patients with uncontrolled COPD and raised blood eosinophils who either have one severe exacerbation or two moderate exacerbations despite triple therapy. This contrasts with the guidance for commencing and continuing monoclonal antibody therapy (MAb) in asthma and will have significant implications for severe asthma services caring for patients with coexisting asthma and COPD or those with asthma and a significant smoking history. Patients with asthma and COPD often experience poorer outcomes than patients with asthma or COPD alone. They are traditionally managed according to asthma pharmacotherapy guidelines; however, under the new guidance this may change. Our perspective is supported by local audit data helping us to reflect on our current practice as a large tertiary severe asthma service of initiating MAb in patients with coexisting asthma and COPD.Disparities in eligibility and access to dupilumab in asthma and COPD guidelines expose key challenges about the best clinical setting for managing patients with coexisting disease, the need for distinct treatment pathways and personalised definitions of treatment success, and whether the current positioning of dupilumab as a second-line therapy within severe asthma pathways in England remains appropriate. Addressing these issues will be critical to supporting equitable clinically appropriate access to monoclonal antibodies in patients with coexisting asthma and COPD in the future.

单克隆抗体治疗重症哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者:重新思考治疗途径和成功。
新的国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)关于dupilumab在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中使用的指南建议,对于不受控制的COPD和血液嗜酸性粒细胞升高的患者,使用dupilumab作为附加治疗,尽管三合一治疗,但仍有一次严重恶化或两次中度恶化。这与在哮喘中开始和持续单克隆抗体治疗(MAb)的指南形成对比,并将对同时患有哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病的患者或有明显吸烟史的哮喘患者的严重哮喘服务具有重要意义。哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者的预后往往比单独患有哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺病的患者差。传统上根据哮喘药物治疗指南进行管理;然而,在新的指导方针下,这种情况可能会改变。我们的观点得到了当地审计数据的支持,帮助我们反思我们目前的做法,作为一家大型三级重症哮喘服务机构,在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病并存的患者中启动单克隆抗体。在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病指南中,dupilumab的资格和可及性的差异暴露了以下关键挑战:管理共存疾病患者的最佳临床环境,不同治疗途径的需求和治疗成功的个性化定义,以及目前在英国将dupilumab定位为严重哮喘途径中的二线治疗是否仍然合适。解决这些问题对于支持未来哮喘和COPD共存患者公平地获得临床适当的单克隆抗体至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书