{"title":"Modifiable Risk Factors and Hearing Loss: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2020","authors":"Yulu Zheng, Tingting Li, Zhiyuan Wu, Yahong Zhu, Zheng Guo, Xingang Li","doi":"10.1111/coa.70153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the associations between major modifiable risk factors and hearing loss.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This serial cross-sectional study was conducted within the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2020 in the United States. Associations were assessed using modified Poisson regression and within-sample population attributable fraction (PAF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight thousand seven hundred and seventy adults aged 40–85 years were included in the analyses, the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (11.7) years, with 4002 men (45.6%). Hearing loss was associated with low educational attainment with prevalence ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval (1.15, 1.31); low income 1.11 (1.04, 1.19); diabetes 1.10 (1.03, 1.18); HDL-C dyslipidaemia 1.13 (1.06, 1.21); obesity 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) and tobacco use 1.11 (1.04, 1.19). Within our analysis, over 25% of hearing loss cases were attributed to modifiable risk factors, with low education or income, HDL-C dyslipidaemia, obesity and tobacco use being the leading contributors, though relative rankings varied slightly in survey-weighted analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Hearing promotion policies should prioritise related modifiable factors to reduce the burden of hearing loss.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"51 6","pages":"929-937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coa.70153","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.70153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore the associations between major modifiable risk factors and hearing loss.
Methods
This serial cross-sectional study was conducted within the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2020 in the United States. Associations were assessed using modified Poisson regression and within-sample population attributable fraction (PAF).
Results
Eight thousand seven hundred and seventy adults aged 40–85 years were included in the analyses, the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (11.7) years, with 4002 men (45.6%). Hearing loss was associated with low educational attainment with prevalence ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval (1.15, 1.31); low income 1.11 (1.04, 1.19); diabetes 1.10 (1.03, 1.18); HDL-C dyslipidaemia 1.13 (1.06, 1.21); obesity 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) and tobacco use 1.11 (1.04, 1.19). Within our analysis, over 25% of hearing loss cases were attributed to modifiable risk factors, with low education or income, HDL-C dyslipidaemia, obesity and tobacco use being the leading contributors, though relative rankings varied slightly in survey-weighted analyses.
Conclusion
Hearing promotion policies should prioritise related modifiable factors to reduce the burden of hearing loss.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.