How Accurately Do Species Distribution Models Predict the Expansion of Invasive Insects, and Does Climate Data Choice Matter? Insights From the Invasion of Dryocosmus kuriphilus

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Journal of Applied Entomology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1111/jen.70103
José Carlos Pérez-Girón, Fernando Castedo-Dorado, María Josefa Lombardero, Pedro Álvarez-Álvarez
{"title":"How Accurately Do Species Distribution Models Predict the Expansion of Invasive Insects, and Does Climate Data Choice Matter? Insights From the Invasion of Dryocosmus kuriphilus","authors":"José Carlos Pérez-Girón,&nbsp;Fernando Castedo-Dorado,&nbsp;María Josefa Lombardero,&nbsp;Pedro Álvarez-Álvarez","doi":"10.1111/jen.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to predict the spread of invasive species, yet their accuracy over time and the influence of climate data resolution remain unclear. Here, we examine the capacity of SDMs to predict the distribution and short-term expansion of the invasive gall wasp <i>Dryocosmus kuriphilus</i>, and compare the performance of locally sourced, annually resolved climate data with global climatic datasets. We modelled the annual distribution and expansion of <i>D. kuriphilus</i> using SDMs. Three climate datasets: regional interpolations, temporally explicit CHELSA time series, and long-term CHELSA averages, were compared to test their influence on model accuracy. Habitat suitability was estimated with GLM, MaxEnt, and Random Forest, and model performance was evaluated with the Boyce index. Temporal transferability was assessed by projecting early-year models to subsequent years and analysing accuracy patterns via multifactorial ANOVA. Model accuracy, measured with the Boyce index, improved over time, surpassing 0.7 for most datasets and algorithms. Differences among climate datasets were minor, although regional data slightly enhanced early predictions. MaxEnt consistently achieved the highest and most stable performance, while Random Forest and GLM were more variable. Models projected beyond their calibration years rapidly lost predictive power, showing limited temporal transferability. ANOVA confirmed that neither climate dataset nor algorithm significantly influenced accuracy, though MaxEnt performed best overall. SDMs are valuable tools for invasive species management when used adaptively. Accuracy improves with more occurrence data but declines when projecting future expansion, highlighting the need for regular updates. Incorporating fine-scale, temporally explicit data enhances early detection, monitoring, and rapid-response interventions. Continuously updated SDMs support timely management decisions, including invasion monitoring, prioritisation of actions, and integration of biological control or other mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Entomology","volume":"150 8","pages":"1035-1046"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jen.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.70103","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to predict the spread of invasive species, yet their accuracy over time and the influence of climate data resolution remain unclear. Here, we examine the capacity of SDMs to predict the distribution and short-term expansion of the invasive gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus, and compare the performance of locally sourced, annually resolved climate data with global climatic datasets. We modelled the annual distribution and expansion of D. kuriphilus using SDMs. Three climate datasets: regional interpolations, temporally explicit CHELSA time series, and long-term CHELSA averages, were compared to test their influence on model accuracy. Habitat suitability was estimated with GLM, MaxEnt, and Random Forest, and model performance was evaluated with the Boyce index. Temporal transferability was assessed by projecting early-year models to subsequent years and analysing accuracy patterns via multifactorial ANOVA. Model accuracy, measured with the Boyce index, improved over time, surpassing 0.7 for most datasets and algorithms. Differences among climate datasets were minor, although regional data slightly enhanced early predictions. MaxEnt consistently achieved the highest and most stable performance, while Random Forest and GLM were more variable. Models projected beyond their calibration years rapidly lost predictive power, showing limited temporal transferability. ANOVA confirmed that neither climate dataset nor algorithm significantly influenced accuracy, though MaxEnt performed best overall. SDMs are valuable tools for invasive species management when used adaptively. Accuracy improves with more occurrence data but declines when projecting future expansion, highlighting the need for regular updates. Incorporating fine-scale, temporally explicit data enhances early detection, monitoring, and rapid-response interventions. Continuously updated SDMs support timely management decisions, including invasion monitoring, prioritisation of actions, and integration of biological control or other mitigation strategies.

Abstract Image

物种分布模型如何准确预测入侵昆虫的扩张,气候数据的选择是否重要?从古氏干蛾入侵的启示
物种分布模型(SDMs)被广泛用于预测入侵物种的传播,但其随时间的准确性和气候数据分辨率的影响尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了SDMs预测入侵瘿蜂(Dryocosmus kuriphilus)分布和短期扩张的能力,并比较了本地来源的、每年解决的气候数据与全球气候数据集的性能。我们用SDMs模型模拟了kuriphilus的年分布和扩张。我们比较了三个气候数据集:区域插值、时间显式CHELSA时间序列和长期CHELSA平均值,以检验它们对模式精度的影响。利用GLM、MaxEnt和Random Forest估算生境适宜性,并利用Boyce指数评价模型性能。通过将早期模型预测到后续年份,并通过多因素方差分析分析准确性模式,评估了时间可转移性。以博伊斯指数衡量的模型精度随着时间的推移而提高,大多数数据集和算法都超过0.7。气候数据集之间的差异不大,尽管区域数据略微增强了早期预测。MaxEnt始终实现最高和最稳定的性能,而Random Forest和GLM则更加可变。超出其校准年的模型预测迅速失去了预测能力,显示出有限的时间可转移性。方差分析证实,气候数据集和算法都没有显著影响准确性,尽管MaxEnt总体上表现最好。自适应使用sdm是入侵物种管理的重要工具。随着事件数据的增加,准确性会提高,但在预测未来的扩张时,准确性会下降,这突出了定期更新的必要性。结合精细尺度、时间明确的数据可以增强早期发现、监测和快速反应干预。持续更新的SDMs支持及时的管理决策,包括入侵监测、确定行动的优先次序以及整合生物防治或其他缓解战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Entomology publishes original articles on current research in applied entomology, including mites and spiders in terrestrial ecosystems. Submit your next manuscript for rapid publication: the average time is currently 6 months from submission to publication. With Journal of Applied Entomology''s dynamic article-by-article publication process, Early View, fully peer-reviewed and type-set articles are published online as soon as they complete, without waiting for full issue compilation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书