Green Infrastructure as a Climate Shield: Nonlinear Flood Response and Extremes Saturation in a Tropical Andean Urban Watershed

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Joseph Sánchez-Balseca, Agustí Pérez-Foguet, Bolivar Erazo
{"title":"Green Infrastructure as a Climate Shield: Nonlinear Flood Response and Extremes Saturation in a Tropical Andean Urban Watershed","authors":"Joseph Sánchez-Balseca,&nbsp;Agustí Pérez-Foguet,&nbsp;Bolivar Erazo","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Assessing flood risk under climate change in data-scarce tropical mountain watersheds requires transparent, reproducible frameworks that explicitly address methodological uncertainties. This study introduces an integrated methodology to evaluate green infrastructure's hydrological role across land-cover and climate scenarios. It combines Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) projections with Quantile Mapping bias correction, Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) analysis, physically informed intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curve development, and spatially explicit Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS). Designed for regions with limited gauging infrastructure, the framework leverages satellite-derived precipitation from the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), open-access climate data. Applied to the Güanguiltagua Metropolitan Park in Quito, Ecuador, the approach reveals context-specific responses: under projections from the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model version 1.2 Low Resolution (MPI-ESM1-2-LR), extreme events (return periods <i>T</i> ≥ 50 years) exhibit a saturation signal converging towards ~95 mm/day—a pattern consistent with documented shifts in Andean convective regimes yet contingent on model resolution and requiring validation with convection-permitting simulations. Critically, conservation of natural cover (Curve Number, CN = 45) consistently reduces peak flows by 73%–85% across all scenarios and return periods, demonstrating green infrastructure's dependable buffering capacity. Urbanized sub-basins (CN = 85) show minimal climate sensitivity, underscoring persistent vulnerability. Findings are explicitly contextualized within methodological constraints (single general circulation model [GCM], coarse resolution, Soil Conservation Service Curve Number [SCS-CN] assumptions), avoiding overgeneralization. The framework's modular design enables adaptation across Global South contexts, offering a transparent template for region-specific flood risk assessment where climate projections and green infrastructure intersect.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"40 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing flood risk under climate change in data-scarce tropical mountain watersheds requires transparent, reproducible frameworks that explicitly address methodological uncertainties. This study introduces an integrated methodology to evaluate green infrastructure's hydrological role across land-cover and climate scenarios. It combines Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) projections with Quantile Mapping bias correction, Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) analysis, physically informed intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curve development, and spatially explicit Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS). Designed for regions with limited gauging infrastructure, the framework leverages satellite-derived precipitation from the Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), open-access climate data. Applied to the Güanguiltagua Metropolitan Park in Quito, Ecuador, the approach reveals context-specific responses: under projections from the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model version 1.2 Low Resolution (MPI-ESM1-2-LR), extreme events (return periods T ≥ 50 years) exhibit a saturation signal converging towards ~95 mm/day—a pattern consistent with documented shifts in Andean convective regimes yet contingent on model resolution and requiring validation with convection-permitting simulations. Critically, conservation of natural cover (Curve Number, CN = 45) consistently reduces peak flows by 73%–85% across all scenarios and return periods, demonstrating green infrastructure's dependable buffering capacity. Urbanized sub-basins (CN = 85) show minimal climate sensitivity, underscoring persistent vulnerability. Findings are explicitly contextualized within methodological constraints (single general circulation model [GCM], coarse resolution, Soil Conservation Service Curve Number [SCS-CN] assumptions), avoiding overgeneralization. The framework's modular design enables adaptation across Global South contexts, offering a transparent template for region-specific flood risk assessment where climate projections and green infrastructure intersect.

Abstract Image

绿色基础设施作为气候屏障:热带安第斯山脉城市流域的非线性洪水响应和极端饱和
在数据匮乏的热带山地流域评估气候变化下的洪水风险需要透明、可重复的框架,明确解决方法上的不确定性。本研究介绍了一种综合方法来评估绿色基础设施在土地覆盖和气候情景中的水文作用。它将耦合模式比对项目第6阶段(CMIP6)预测与分位数映射偏差校正、广义极值(GEV)分析、物理信息强度-持续时间-频率(IDF)曲线开发以及空间明确的水文工程中心-水文建模系统(HEC-HMS)相结合。该框架是为测量基础设施有限的地区设计的,利用了来自气候灾害组红外降水站数据(CHIRPS)的卫星降水,以及开放获取的气候数据。该方法应用于厄瓜多尔基多的ganguiltagua大都会公园,揭示了具体情况的反应:根据马克斯普朗克研究所1.2版低分辨率地球系统模型(MPI-ESM1-2-LR)的预测,极端事件(回归期T≥50年)表现出向~95毫米/天收敛的饱和信号——这一模式与记录的安第斯对流状态的变化一致,但取决于模型分辨率,需要用允许对流的模拟进行验证。至关重要的是,自然覆盖的保护(曲线数,CN = 45)在所有情景和回归期间都能持续减少73%-85%的峰值流量,表明绿色基础设施具有可靠的缓冲能力。城市化子流域(CN = 85)表现出最小的气候敏感性,突出了持续的脆弱性。研究结果明确地在方法约束(单一环流模型[GCM]、粗分辨率、土壤保持服务曲线数[SCS-CN]假设)的背景下进行,避免了过度概括。该框架的模块化设计使其能够适应全球南方的环境,为气候预测和绿色基础设施交叉的特定地区的洪水风险评估提供了一个透明的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书