{"title":"Climate Constraints on the Methane‒Carbon Efficiency of Global Wetlands: Spatiotemporal Drivers and Future Projections","authors":"Tingting Zhu, Junjie Li, Junji Yuan, Weixin Ding","doi":"10.1029/2025EF008003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wetlands play an important role in the growth rate of atmospheric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) concentrations, with gross primary productivity (GPP) serving as a key proxy for predicting CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes, yet the efficiency with which photosynthetic carbon is associated with CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes remains poorly quantified at the global scale. Here, we integrated multiple GPP products with CH<sub>4</sub> data sets to evaluate global CH<sub>4</sub>/GPP ratios, as an apparent ecosystem-level metric of methane–carbon coupling. We found striking spatial heterogeneity, with the highest CH<sub>4</sub>/GPP ratios in northern high-latitude and tropical wetlands, and much lower values in some temperate regions. Using a random forest model, all variables explained 81% of the global variance in CH<sub>4</sub>/GPP, with temperature being the strongest predictor. Future projections under four Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios suggested a relatively stable global mean CH<sub>4</sub>/GPP ratio, likely reflecting compensating regional changes and intrinsic climatic constraints on methane–carbon coupling. Despite this stability, scenario-dependent differences became apparent, with higher ratios under high-emission pathways. These results indicate that wetland methane–carbon coupling may be a spatially variable and climate-sensitive property. Incorporating such relationships into Earth System Models may help reduce uncertainties in projecting wetland carbon–climate feedbacks under future climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"14 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF008003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF008003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wetlands play an important role in the growth rate of atmospheric methane (CH4) concentrations, with gross primary productivity (GPP) serving as a key proxy for predicting CH4 fluxes, yet the efficiency with which photosynthetic carbon is associated with CH4 fluxes remains poorly quantified at the global scale. Here, we integrated multiple GPP products with CH4 data sets to evaluate global CH4/GPP ratios, as an apparent ecosystem-level metric of methane–carbon coupling. We found striking spatial heterogeneity, with the highest CH4/GPP ratios in northern high-latitude and tropical wetlands, and much lower values in some temperate regions. Using a random forest model, all variables explained 81% of the global variance in CH4/GPP, with temperature being the strongest predictor. Future projections under four Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios suggested a relatively stable global mean CH4/GPP ratio, likely reflecting compensating regional changes and intrinsic climatic constraints on methane–carbon coupling. Despite this stability, scenario-dependent differences became apparent, with higher ratios under high-emission pathways. These results indicate that wetland methane–carbon coupling may be a spatially variable and climate-sensitive property. Incorporating such relationships into Earth System Models may help reduce uncertainties in projecting wetland carbon–climate feedbacks under future climate change.
期刊介绍:
Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.