{"title":"Microsurgical resection and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for olfactory groove meningiomas: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Datong Zheng, Wenbo He, Yucheng Chen, Yu Hu, Ruilian Chen, Zhouhaoran Chen, Jingxuan Hou, Zhiyong Liu, Jianguo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.12.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) are common anterior skull base tumors. While microsurgery is standard, it risks complications like olfactory impairment. Upfront Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an alternative, but comparative studies against surgery as an initial treatment are scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study (2009–2023) compared 59 patients undergoing initial microsurgery with 54 receiving upfront GKRS for OGMs at West China Hospital. Tumor control rates, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and neurological function outcomes were analyzed to evaluate the appropriate treatment strategy for OGMs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Long-term tumor control was similar between initial microsurgery and upfront GKRS (Ten-year tumor control rates: 91.9% vs. 84.2%, P = 0.99). Upfront GKRS was associated with better patient quality of life (Mean KPS scores 93.1 vs. 87.0, P < 0.001), predicted by treatment modality (P = 0.027) and baseline KPS (P < 0.001). Olfactory preservation was superior after GKRS (98.0% vs. 86.4%, P = 0.048). Initial microsurgery (OR = 6.36, P = 0.032) and pre-treatment anosmia (OR = 91.05, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of post-treatment anosmia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both upfront GKRS and microsurgery offer excellent long-term OGM control. Treatment should be individualized. GKRS provides lower morbidity and superior olfactory preservation, making it preferable for smaller tumors without significant mass effect. Surgery remains necessary for larger or compressive lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55454,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Surgery","volume":"49 8","pages":"Pages 4586-4594"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958425036498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) are common anterior skull base tumors. While microsurgery is standard, it risks complications like olfactory impairment. Upfront Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an alternative, but comparative studies against surgery as an initial treatment are scarce.
Methods
This retrospective study (2009–2023) compared 59 patients undergoing initial microsurgery with 54 receiving upfront GKRS for OGMs at West China Hospital. Tumor control rates, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and neurological function outcomes were analyzed to evaluate the appropriate treatment strategy for OGMs.
Results
Long-term tumor control was similar between initial microsurgery and upfront GKRS (Ten-year tumor control rates: 91.9% vs. 84.2%, P = 0.99). Upfront GKRS was associated with better patient quality of life (Mean KPS scores 93.1 vs. 87.0, P < 0.001), predicted by treatment modality (P = 0.027) and baseline KPS (P < 0.001). Olfactory preservation was superior after GKRS (98.0% vs. 86.4%, P = 0.048). Initial microsurgery (OR = 6.36, P = 0.032) and pre-treatment anosmia (OR = 91.05, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of post-treatment anosmia.
Conclusions
Both upfront GKRS and microsurgery offer excellent long-term OGM control. Treatment should be individualized. GKRS provides lower morbidity and superior olfactory preservation, making it preferable for smaller tumors without significant mass effect. Surgery remains necessary for larger or compressive lesions.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Surgery, launched in 1978, is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of the Asian Surgical Association, the Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association, and the Taiwan Society of Coloproctology. The Journal is published monthly by Elsevier and is indexed in SCIE, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Embase, Current Contents, PubMed, Current Abstracts, BioEngineering Abstracts, SIIC Data Bases, CAB Abstracts, and CAB Health.
ASJSUR has a growing reputation as an important medium for the dissemination of cutting-edge developments in surgery and its related disciplines in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond. Studies on state-of-the-art surgical innovations across the entire spectrum of clinical and experimental surgery are particularly welcome.
The journal publishes original articles, review articles, and case reports that are of exceptional and unique importance. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, and case reports that are of exceptional and unique importance.