Patient-specific hemodynamic assessment using experimental and computational approaches in anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery: Case study

IF 2.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JTCVS Techniques Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.xjtc.2026.102378
Thangam Natarajan PhD, Yasaman Farsiani PhD, Jayanthi Parthasarathy PhD, Silvana Molossi MD, PhD, Carlos M. Mery MD, MPH, Michael Jiang MD, Joanna Ghobrial MD, Athar M. Qureshi MD, Tara Karamlou MD, MSc, Lakshmiprasad Dasi PhD, Rajesh Krishnamurthy MD
{"title":"Patient-specific hemodynamic assessment using experimental and computational approaches in anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery: Case study","authors":"Thangam Natarajan PhD,&nbsp;Yasaman Farsiani PhD,&nbsp;Jayanthi Parthasarathy PhD,&nbsp;Silvana Molossi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Carlos M. Mery MD, MPH,&nbsp;Michael Jiang MD,&nbsp;Joanna Ghobrial MD,&nbsp;Athar M. Qureshi MD,&nbsp;Tara Karamlou MD, MSc,&nbsp;Lakshmiprasad Dasi PhD,&nbsp;Rajesh Krishnamurthy MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2026.102378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and demonstrate the feasibility of a patient-specific framework combining experimental and computational modeling for noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery (AAOCA) anatomy derived from coronary computed tomography angiography.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A patient with a left AAOCA who experienced aborted sudden cardiac death underwent an unroofing procedure and later required coronary reimplantation after recurrent aborted sudden cardiac death was studied. Patient-specific models were generated at 3 stages: preoperative, postunroofing, and postreimplantation. Experimental assessment used 3-dimensional–printed aortocoronary models integrated with a pulsatile flow loop, whereas computational simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and flow velocities were evaluated at rest and under simulated stress and compared with clinical stress FFR obtained during cardiac catheterization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Clinical cardiac catheterization-derived FFR under dobutamine stress was 0.77 postunroofing and 0.99 after reimplantation. Experimental testing demonstrated similar stress FFR of 0.7 in native left AAOCA (with short intramural course), 0.8 after unroofing (compression from the intercoronary pillar), and 0.9 postreimplantation. Computational FFR agreed with both experimental and clinical measurements: lowest values were 0.74 preoperatively, 0.8 post unroofing, and 0.87 post reimplantation. Flow patterns and pressure gradients corresponded with surgical and anatomical observations, showing improved coronary perfusion after reimplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This hybrid experimental-computational workflow enables patient-specific assessment of AAOCA hemodynamics across sequential surgical stages. The approach provides accurate evaluation of coronary anatomy, cross-validation of model results, and preliminary mechanistic insight into ischemia, supporting the feasibility of this hybrid approach for patient-specific hemodynamic evaluation and motivating future investigation in larger cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 102378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250726001859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop and demonstrate the feasibility of a patient-specific framework combining experimental and computational modeling for noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery (AAOCA) anatomy derived from coronary computed tomography angiography.

Methods

A patient with a left AAOCA who experienced aborted sudden cardiac death underwent an unroofing procedure and later required coronary reimplantation after recurrent aborted sudden cardiac death was studied. Patient-specific models were generated at 3 stages: preoperative, postunroofing, and postreimplantation. Experimental assessment used 3-dimensional–printed aortocoronary models integrated with a pulsatile flow loop, whereas computational simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and flow velocities were evaluated at rest and under simulated stress and compared with clinical stress FFR obtained during cardiac catheterization.

Results

Clinical cardiac catheterization-derived FFR under dobutamine stress was 0.77 postunroofing and 0.99 after reimplantation. Experimental testing demonstrated similar stress FFR of 0.7 in native left AAOCA (with short intramural course), 0.8 after unroofing (compression from the intercoronary pillar), and 0.9 postreimplantation. Computational FFR agreed with both experimental and clinical measurements: lowest values were 0.74 preoperatively, 0.8 post unroofing, and 0.87 post reimplantation. Flow patterns and pressure gradients corresponded with surgical and anatomical observations, showing improved coronary perfusion after reimplantation.

Conclusions

This hybrid experimental-computational workflow enables patient-specific assessment of AAOCA hemodynamics across sequential surgical stages. The approach provides accurate evaluation of coronary anatomy, cross-validation of model results, and preliminary mechanistic insight into ischemia, supporting the feasibility of this hybrid approach for patient-specific hemodynamic evaluation and motivating future investigation in larger cohorts.
使用实验和计算方法评估冠状动脉异常主动脉起源的患者特异性血流动力学:个案研究
目的建立并证明一种结合实验和计算模型的患者特异性框架的可行性,用于冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影得出的冠状动脉异常主动脉起源(AAOCA)解剖的无创血流动力学评估。方法对1例发生流产性心源性猝死的左AAOCA患者在复发性流产性心源性猝死后行冠状动脉去顶手术,后行冠状动脉再植术进行研究。患者特异性模型分为三个阶段:术前、去顶后和植入后。实验评估使用三维打印的冠状动脉模型与脉动血流环相结合,而计算模拟使用计算流体动力学进行。评估静息和模拟应激下的血流储备分数(FFR)和血流速度,并与心导管置换术中获得的临床应激FFR进行比较。结果多巴酚丁胺应激下心导管衍生的FFR在去顶后为0.77,再植后为0.99。实验测试表明,原生左侧AAOCA(短期内病程)的应力FFR相似,为0.7,去顶后(从冠状动脉间柱压迫)为0.8,植入后为0.9。计算FFR与实验和临床测量结果一致:术前最低为0.74,去顶后为0.8,再植后为0.87。血流模式和压力梯度与手术和解剖观察相符,显示再植后冠状动脉灌注改善。结论:这种混合的实验-计算工作流程可以跨顺序手术阶段对AAOCA血流动力学进行患者特异性评估。该方法提供了准确的冠状动脉解剖评估,模型结果的交叉验证,以及对缺血的初步机制洞察,支持了这种混合方法用于患者特异性血流动力学评估的可行性,并推动了未来更大队列的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书