Comparison of 2 approaches for left atrial myxoma excision: Outcomes and safety

IF 2.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
JTCVS Techniques Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-06 DOI:10.1016/j.xjtc.2026.102402
Hazem Aljasem MD, FRCS (CTh), Jason Kho MD, MRCS, Hani Ali-Ghosh MD, FRCS (CTh), Dimitrios Pousios MD, FECTS, Clifford Barlow MD, FRCS (CTh)
{"title":"Comparison of 2 approaches for left atrial myxoma excision: Outcomes and safety","authors":"Hazem Aljasem MD, FRCS (CTh),&nbsp;Jason Kho MD, MRCS,&nbsp;Hani Ali-Ghosh MD, FRCS (CTh),&nbsp;Dimitrios Pousios MD, FECTS,&nbsp;Clifford Barlow MD, FRCS (CTh)","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2026.102402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cardiac myxomas are the most common primary benign cardiac tumors, with approximately 75% located in the left atrium (LA). The optimal surgical approach for LA myxoma excision remains controversial. This study aims to compare the uniatrial and biatrial approaches in terms of safety and outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 157 consecutive patients diagnosed with LA myxoma over a 24-year period. Patients were divided into uniatrial (LA group) and biatrial groups on the basis of the surgical approach to compare outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in mean age (<em>P</em> = .61), gender distribution (<em>P</em> = .72), clinical presentation (<em>P</em> = .071), New York Heart Association classification (<em>P</em> = .97), preoperative and postoperative rhythm (<em>P</em> = .83 and <em>P</em> = .20, respectively), concomitant procedures (<em>P</em> = .63), overall postoperative complications (<em>P</em> = .32), re-exploration for bleeding (<em>P</em> = 1), 30-day mortality (<em>P</em> = 1), in-hospital stay (<em>P</em> = .08), long-term survival (<em>P</em> = .42), and recurrence rate (<em>P</em> = .38). However, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic crossclamp time were significantly longer in the biatrial group (cardiopulmonary bypass: 81 vs 72 minutes, <em>P</em> = .05; crossclamp: 55 vs 48 minutes, <em>P</em> = .05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in short-, mid- (5-year), and long-term (&gt;10-year) survival rates. Eight cases initially planned for LA approach were converted to biatrial because of technical difficulty.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study on this topic. Both uniatrial and biatrial approaches provide safe and effective resection of left atrial myxomas with comparable long-term outcomes. The biatrial approach offers improved exposure but at the expense of longer operative times. These findings support an individualized surgical strategy on the basis of tumor characteristics and intraoperative exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 102402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250726002099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Cardiac myxomas are the most common primary benign cardiac tumors, with approximately 75% located in the left atrium (LA). The optimal surgical approach for LA myxoma excision remains controversial. This study aims to compare the uniatrial and biatrial approaches in terms of safety and outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 157 consecutive patients diagnosed with LA myxoma over a 24-year period. Patients were divided into uniatrial (LA group) and biatrial groups on the basis of the surgical approach to compare outcomes.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in mean age (P = .61), gender distribution (P = .72), clinical presentation (P = .071), New York Heart Association classification (P = .97), preoperative and postoperative rhythm (P = .83 and P = .20, respectively), concomitant procedures (P = .63), overall postoperative complications (P = .32), re-exploration for bleeding (P = 1), 30-day mortality (P = 1), in-hospital stay (P = .08), long-term survival (P = .42), and recurrence rate (P = .38). However, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic crossclamp time were significantly longer in the biatrial group (cardiopulmonary bypass: 81 vs 72 minutes, P = .05; crossclamp: 55 vs 48 minutes, P = .05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference in short-, mid- (5-year), and long-term (>10-year) survival rates. Eight cases initially planned for LA approach were converted to biatrial because of technical difficulty.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest single-center study on this topic. Both uniatrial and biatrial approaches provide safe and effective resection of left atrial myxomas with comparable long-term outcomes. The biatrial approach offers improved exposure but at the expense of longer operative times. These findings support an individualized surgical strategy on the basis of tumor characteristics and intraoperative exposure.
左心房黏液瘤切除两种入路的比较:结果和安全性
目的心脏黏液瘤是最常见的原发性良性心脏肿瘤,约75%位于左心房(LA)。LA黏液瘤切除的最佳手术方法仍有争议。本研究旨在比较单房和双房入路的安全性和结果。方法回顾性分析了157例连续24年确诊为LA黏液瘤的患者。根据手术入路将患者分为单房组(LA组)和双房组进行比较。ResultsThere之间没有统计上的显著差异的两组平均年龄(P =收),性别分布(P =标识)、临床表现(P = .071),纽约心脏协会分类(P = .97点)、术前和术后的节奏(分别P =点和P = .20),伴随的过程(P =点),整体术后并发症(P =收),re-exploration出血(P = 1), 30天死亡率(P = 1),住院(P =。08),长期生存(P =点),复发率(P = 0.38)。然而,双房组的平均体外循环时间和主动脉交叉夹时间明显更长(体外循环:81 vs 72分钟,P = 0.05;交叉夹:55 vs 48分钟,P = 0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,短期、中期(5年)和长期(10年)生存率无显著差异。由于技术困难,最初计划采用LA入路的8例转为双房入路。据我们所知,这是关于该主题的最大的单中心研究。单房入路和双房入路均可提供安全有效的左心房黏液瘤切除术,且远期疗效相当。双心房入路可改善暴露,但需延长手术时间。这些发现支持基于肿瘤特征和术中暴露的个体化手术策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书