Diagnostic accuracy of one-step nucleic acid amplification for detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Asian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.12.208
Yanzhao Liu, Junjie Ren, Pan Zhang, Jie Lv, Hongcheng Zhu, Wei Dong, Changzai Li
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of one-step nucleic acid amplification for detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A meta-analysis","authors":"Yanzhao Liu,&nbsp;Junjie Ren,&nbsp;Pan Zhang,&nbsp;Jie Lv,&nbsp;Hongcheng Zhu,&nbsp;Wei Dong,&nbsp;Changzai Li","doi":"10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.12.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay has been widely studied for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer. However, its diagnostic performance remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of OSNA in detecting SLN metastasis in breast cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published up to July 2025. All data were analyzed using Stata 16 and RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analysis was performed using a fixed -effects model. A total of 20 eligible studies were included in this analysis, comprising 8917 SLNs from 4645 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of OSNA for detecting SLN metastasis were 0.88 (95 % CI:0.84–0.91), 0.95 (95 % CI:0.94–0.96), 18.0 (95 % CI:14.6–22.1), 0.13(95 % CI:0.10–0.17),141 (95 % CI:97–205), and 0.97 (95 % CI:0.96–0.98), respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC for frozen section (FS) were 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.56–0.94), 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.98–1.00), 127.0 (95 % CI: 37.1–435.4), 0.18 (95 % CI: 0.06–0.51), 708 (95 % CI: 198–2541), and 0.99 (95 % CI:0.98–1.00), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the AUC between OSNA and FS (p = 0.85, z = 0.19). The OSNA assay is a highly accurate intraoperative tool for detecting SLN metastasis in breast cancer, demonstrating high sensitivity and overall diagnostic performance comparable to FS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55454,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Surgery","volume":"49 8","pages":"Pages 4520-4526"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958425037364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay has been widely studied for intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer. However, its diagnostic performance remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of OSNA in detecting SLN metastasis in breast cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published up to July 2025. All data were analyzed using Stata 16 and RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analysis was performed using a fixed -effects model. A total of 20 eligible studies were included in this analysis, comprising 8917 SLNs from 4645 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of OSNA for detecting SLN metastasis were 0.88 (95 % CI:0.84–0.91), 0.95 (95 % CI:0.94–0.96), 18.0 (95 % CI:14.6–22.1), 0.13(95 % CI:0.10–0.17),141 (95 % CI:97–205), and 0.97 (95 % CI:0.96–0.98), respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC for frozen section (FS) were 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.56–0.94), 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.98–1.00), 127.0 (95 % CI: 37.1–435.4), 0.18 (95 % CI: 0.06–0.51), 708 (95 % CI: 198–2541), and 0.99 (95 % CI:0.98–1.00), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the AUC between OSNA and FS (p = 0.85, z = 0.19). The OSNA assay is a highly accurate intraoperative tool for detecting SLN metastasis in breast cancer, demonstrating high sensitivity and overall diagnostic performance comparable to FS.
一步核酸扩增检测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的诊断准确性:荟萃分析
一步核酸扩增(OSNA)技术在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移的术中诊断中得到了广泛的研究。然而,其诊断性能仍不确定。本研究的目的是评估OSNA检测乳腺癌SLN转移的准确性。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,检索了截至2025年7月发表的相关研究。所有数据采用Stata 16和RevMan 5.3进行分析。采用固定效应模型进行亚组分析。本分析共纳入20项符合条件的研究,包括来自4645名患者的8917个sln。OSNA检测SLN转移的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断优势比(DOR)、总受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.88 (95% CI:0.84 ~ 0.91)、0.95 (95% CI:0.94 ~ 0.96)、18.0 (95% CI:14.6 ~ 22.1)、0.13(95% CI:0.10 ~ 0.17)、141 (95% CI:97 ~ 205)、0.97 (95% CI:0.96 ~ 0.98)。冷冻切片(FS)的总体敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为0.82 (95% CI: 0.56 ~ 0.94)、0.99 (95% CI:0.98 ~ 1.00)、127.0 (95% CI: 371 ~ 435.4)、0.18 (95% CI: 0.06 ~ 0.51)、708 (95% CI: 198 ~ 2541)和0.99 (95% CI:0.98 ~ 1.00)。OSNA组与FS组的AUC差异无统计学意义(p = 0.85, z = 0.19)。OSNA检测是一种高度准确的术中检测乳腺癌SLN转移的工具,具有与FS相当的高灵敏度和总体诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Surgery
Asian Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
31.40%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Surgery, launched in 1978, is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of the Asian Surgical Association, the Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association, and the Taiwan Society of Coloproctology. The Journal is published monthly by Elsevier and is indexed in SCIE, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Embase, Current Contents, PubMed, Current Abstracts, BioEngineering Abstracts, SIIC Data Bases, CAB Abstracts, and CAB Health. ASJSUR has a growing reputation as an important medium for the dissemination of cutting-edge developments in surgery and its related disciplines in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond. Studies on state-of-the-art surgical innovations across the entire spectrum of clinical and experimental surgery are particularly welcome. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, and case reports that are of exceptional and unique importance. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, and case reports that are of exceptional and unique importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书