Maintenance-related service failures and airline reputational risk: A mixed-method document analysis and risk index approach

IF 4.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Arthur C. Dela Peña
{"title":"Maintenance-related service failures and airline reputational risk: A mixed-method document analysis and risk index approach","authors":"Arthur C. Dela Peña","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aviation maintenance is commonly evaluated through airworthiness, safety, reliability, compliance, and operational continuity, but its reputational implications remain less examined when technical disruptions become publicly visible. This study examined how maintenance-related service failures may contribute to airline reputational risk using a qualitative-dominant mixed-method document analysis of secondary documentary and public digital trace data. The corpus included 16 anonymized maintenance-related airline disruption cases reported from 2019 to 2025 across Southeast Asia, wider Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and the Middle East. A total of 168 public documents and digital trace records were analyzed, including aviation news reports, airline advisories, online reviews, public complaints, and social media posts. Directed and inductive content analysis identified reputational risk themes, while descriptive frequency analysis and the exploratory Maintenance-Linked Reputational Risk Index (MLRRI) were used to classify relative risk severity across cases. Findings showed that technical delays, visible cabin defects, cancellations due to aircraft defects, aircraft substitutions, return-to-gate events, and emergency diversions became reputationally salient when publicly interpreted through safety concern, maintenance doubt, trust erosion, negative word-of-mouth, or response inadequacy. MLRRI classifications ranged from moderate to severe, with higher classifications observed in emergency diversion and return-to-gate cases. However, visible cabin defects and poorly communicated technical delays also showed elevated reputational sensitivity. Airline response quality appeared to be a descriptive differentiator, as clearer, timely, empathetic, and corrective responses were associated with weaker escalation. The study proposes the MLRRAM and exploratory MLRRI as initial, non-validated tools for structured analysis of maintenance-linked reputational risk in digitally visible aviation contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101821"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539526002270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aviation maintenance is commonly evaluated through airworthiness, safety, reliability, compliance, and operational continuity, but its reputational implications remain less examined when technical disruptions become publicly visible. This study examined how maintenance-related service failures may contribute to airline reputational risk using a qualitative-dominant mixed-method document analysis of secondary documentary and public digital trace data. The corpus included 16 anonymized maintenance-related airline disruption cases reported from 2019 to 2025 across Southeast Asia, wider Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, and the Middle East. A total of 168 public documents and digital trace records were analyzed, including aviation news reports, airline advisories, online reviews, public complaints, and social media posts. Directed and inductive content analysis identified reputational risk themes, while descriptive frequency analysis and the exploratory Maintenance-Linked Reputational Risk Index (MLRRI) were used to classify relative risk severity across cases. Findings showed that technical delays, visible cabin defects, cancellations due to aircraft defects, aircraft substitutions, return-to-gate events, and emergency diversions became reputationally salient when publicly interpreted through safety concern, maintenance doubt, trust erosion, negative word-of-mouth, or response inadequacy. MLRRI classifications ranged from moderate to severe, with higher classifications observed in emergency diversion and return-to-gate cases. However, visible cabin defects and poorly communicated technical delays also showed elevated reputational sensitivity. Airline response quality appeared to be a descriptive differentiator, as clearer, timely, empathetic, and corrective responses were associated with weaker escalation. The study proposes the MLRRAM and exploratory MLRRI as initial, non-validated tools for structured analysis of maintenance-linked reputational risk in digitally visible aviation contexts.
维修相关服务故障与航空公司声誉风险:混合方法文件分析和风险指数方法
航空维修通常通过适航性、安全性、可靠性、合规性和操作连续性来评估,但当技术中断变得公开可见时,其声誉影响就很少得到审查。本研究使用定性为主的混合方法对二级文件和公共数字跟踪数据进行文档分析,研究了与维护相关的服务故障如何影响航空公司的声誉风险。该语料库包括2019年至2025年东南亚、亚太地区、北美、欧洲和中东地区报告的16起与维护相关的航空公司中断事件。总共分析了168份公共文件和数字追踪记录,包括航空新闻报道、航空公司咨询、在线评论、公众投诉和社交媒体帖子。直接和归纳内容分析确定了声誉风险主题,而描述性频率分析和探索性维护相关声誉风险指数(MLRRI)用于分类不同情况下的相对风险严重程度。调查结果显示,技术延误、可见客舱缺陷、飞机缺陷导致的航班取消、飞机替换、返回登机门事件和紧急备降,当通过安全担忧、维护怀疑、信任侵蚀、负面口碑或反应不足等公开解释时,这些事件在声誉上变得突出。MLRRI的分类从中度到重度不等,在紧急分流和返回门的病例中观察到更高的分类。然而,可见的客舱缺陷和沟通不畅的技术延误也显示出较高的声誉敏感性。航空公司的反应质量似乎是一个描述性的区分因素,因为更清晰、及时、同理心和纠正性的反应与较弱的升级相关。该研究建议将MLRRAM和探索性MLRRI作为初始的、未经验证的工具,用于数字化可见航空环境中与维护相关的声誉风险的结构化分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书