Efficacy of an internet–based intervention for loneliness in older adults: An RCT

IF 3 Q3 Psychology
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101124
David J. Eberle, Andreas Maercker, Eva Heim, Jun Wen, Christine Dworschak
{"title":"Efficacy of an internet–based intervention for loneliness in older adults: An RCT","authors":"David J. Eberle,&nbsp;Andreas Maercker,&nbsp;Eva Heim,&nbsp;Jun Wen,&nbsp;Christine Dworschak","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Loneliness is an increasing issue in modern society and leads to a wide range of health problems. Due to various reasons, older adults are particularly affected by loneliness and often not effectively supported by standard interventions. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new internet–based loneliness intervention for elderly individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>N = 117 individuals participated in the study. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) includes an intervention group and a waitlist control group. The intervention condition is characterized by 7 therapeutic modules to address loneliness and related psychological problems. A baseline, post–intervention, and 6 months follow–up assessment was administered to measure the efficacy of the program.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings showed no significant loneliness differences across participants at post–intervention and follow–up. However, in the intervention group, male individuals were characterized by lower loneliness levels compared to the control group at post–intervention. At post–intervention, depressive symptoms were also significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group across all participants.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The present study did not monitor to what extent participants engaged with the therapeutic program and its modules. It is also not known which individual modules of the program contributed most or least to the observed results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings demonstrate the importance of sociodemographic factors in the treatment of loneliness. The intervention showed partial efficacy and is most suitable for lonely elderly individuals with depressive symptoms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915326001034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Loneliness is an increasing issue in modern society and leads to a wide range of health problems. Due to various reasons, older adults are particularly affected by loneliness and often not effectively supported by standard interventions. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new internet–based loneliness intervention for elderly individuals.

Methods

N = 117 individuals participated in the study. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) includes an intervention group and a waitlist control group. The intervention condition is characterized by 7 therapeutic modules to address loneliness and related psychological problems. A baseline, post–intervention, and 6 months follow–up assessment was administered to measure the efficacy of the program.

Results

Findings showed no significant loneliness differences across participants at post–intervention and follow–up. However, in the intervention group, male individuals were characterized by lower loneliness levels compared to the control group at post–intervention. At post–intervention, depressive symptoms were also significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group across all participants.

Limitations

The present study did not monitor to what extent participants engaged with the therapeutic program and its modules. It is also not known which individual modules of the program contributed most or least to the observed results.

Conclusions

The findings demonstrate the importance of sociodemographic factors in the treatment of loneliness. The intervention showed partial efficacy and is most suitable for lonely elderly individuals with depressive symptoms.
基于互联网的老年人孤独感干预的有效性:一项随机对照试验
孤独在现代社会是一个日益严重的问题,并导致了广泛的健康问题。由于各种原因,老年人特别容易受到孤独的影响,而且往往得不到标准干预措施的有效支持。本研究的目的是探讨一种新的基于互联网的孤独感干预对老年人的效果。方法117人参与研究。本随机对照试验(RCT)包括干预组和候补组。干预条件的特点是7个治疗模块,以解决孤独和相关的心理问题。通过基线、干预后和6个月随访评估来衡量该方案的有效性。结果在干预后和随访中,受试者的孤独感无显著差异。然而,在干预组中,男性个体在干预后的孤独感水平低于对照组。在干预后,与对照组相比,干预组的抑郁症状也显著降低。局限性:目前的研究没有监测参与者参与治疗方案及其模块的程度。也不知道程序的哪个单独模块对观察到的结果贡献最大或贡献最小。结论社会人口学因素在孤独感治疗中的重要性。干预显示部分疗效,最适合有抑郁症状的孤独老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书